Browser Extensions · head to head
Violentmonkey vs WhatFont
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Violentmonkey smaller script ecosystem compared to Tampermonkey which has larger user base and more available scripts; WhatFont can only detect web-safe fonts and fonts loaded via web font services
- They diverge on capability: Violentmonkey covers Userscript support, WhatFont covers Font detection.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Violentmonkey and WhatFont actually diverge.
| Attribute | Violentmonkey | WhatFont |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Chrome, Firefox, Edge | Chrome, Firefox, Arc |
| Founded | 2013 | 2011 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (Unknown), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Browser Extensions).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Violentmonkey
- Userscript support
- Clean interface
- Cloud sync
- Script editor
- Opera support
Only in WhatFont
- Font detection
- Typography info
- Service detection
- Hover inspection
- Safari support
Both cover
- Chrome support
- Firefox support
- Edge support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Violentmonkey
- Run open-source userscripts to customize or automate web pagesnot WhatFont
- Import scripts compatible with Greasemonkey and Tampermonkey formatsnot WhatFont
- Sync scripts and settings across browsers via Dropbox, OneDrive, Google Drive, or WebDAVnot WhatFont
- Batch import/export scripts as zip filesnot WhatFont
WhatFont
- Identifying typefaces used on competitor websites for design researchnot Violentmonkey
- Sourcing font inspiration from high-performing landing pagesnot Violentmonkey
- Discovering web font services like Google Fonts or Typekit on sitesnot Violentmonkey
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Violentmonkey
- Smaller script ecosystem compared to Tampermonkey which has larger user base and more available scripts
- Less marketing and visibility results in lower adoption compared to more widely-known alternatives
- Community maintenance model means slower feature development compared to commercial alternatives
WhatFont
- Can only detect web-safe fonts and fonts loaded via web font services
- Does not work on images with embedded text or rasterized typography
- Limited to inspecting single text elements at a time
Pricing, plan by plan
Violentmonkey
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Violentmonkey review.
WhatFont
Free- FreeFree
- Font inspection on any website
- Font family identification
- Font size and weight detection
Which should you pick?
Choose Violentmonkey if
- You need userscript support.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Chrome, Firefox, Edge.
- You also want clean interface.
Choose WhatFont if
- You need font detection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Chrome, Firefox, Arc.
- You also want typography info.
Questions people ask
- Is Violentmonkey or WhatFont better?
- Neither clearly leads. Violentmonkey starts at Free and WhatFont at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Violentmonkey or WhatFont?
- Violentmonkey starts at Free and WhatFont at Free.
- Does Violentmonkey or WhatFont run on more platforms?
- Violentmonkey runs on Chrome, Firefox, Edge. WhatFont runs on Chrome, Firefox, Arc.
- Can I use Violentmonkey for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Violentmonkey best used for?
- Violentmonkey is most often used for run open-source userscripts to customize or automate web pages, import scripts compatible with greasemonkey and tampermonkey formats, sync scripts and settings across browsers via dropbox, onedrive, google drive, or webdav, batch import/export scripts as zip files. Of those, run open-source userscripts to customize or automate web pages and import scripts compatible with greasemonkey and tampermonkey formats are not what WhatFont is typically brought in for.
- What can Violentmonkey do that WhatFont cannot?
- Violentmonkey covers Userscript support, Clean interface, Cloud sync, Script editor. WhatFont covers Font detection, Typography info, Service detection, Hover inspection. Both handle Chrome support, Firefox support, Edge support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Violentmonkey: Is Violentmonkey open-source?
Yes. Violentmonkey is fully open-source and available on GitHub, making it free to use and community-maintained unlike Tampermonkey which has a larger proprietary ecosystem.
SourceWhatFont: How do I use WhatFont to inspect fonts?
Click the WhatFont icon in your browser toolbar to activate it, then hover over any text on a webpage to see the font name and details in a pop-up. Click the text to reveal additional information like font style, weight, color, and font samples.
SourceViolentmonkey: What browsers does Violentmonkey support?
Violentmonkey works on browsers with WebExtensions support, including Chrome, Firefox, Edge, and other Chromium-based browsers.
SourceWhatFont: What browsers does WhatFont support?
WhatFont works on Google Chrome, Firefox, and Arc browser. It is available as a free extension in each browser's extension store.
SourceViolentmonkey: How does Violentmonkey compare to Tampermonkey in performance?
Community benchmarks show Violentmonkey uses about 15 to 30 percent less RAM on Chrome compared to Tampermonkey when managing many open tabs.
SourceWhatFont: Is WhatFont free?
Yes. WhatFont is a completely free browser extension with no paid tier or premium features. It is maintained as a free tool for designers and developers.
SourceViolentmonkey: What is the current version of Violentmonkey?
Violentmonkey reached version 2.46.0 as of July 31, 2026, with active ongoing development and regular updates to the open-source project.
SourceRelated pages
More on Violentmonkey
Other head to heads
- Violentmonkey vs Dark Reader
- Violentmonkey vs Privacy Badger
- Violentmonkey vs Awesome Screenshot
- Violentmonkey vs Tampermonkey
- Violentmonkey vs LanguageTool
- Violentmonkey vs uBlock Origin
- Violentmonkey vs Pocket
- Violentmonkey vs Raindrop.io
- Violentmonkey vs Instapaper
- Violentmonkey vs Honey
- Violentmonkey vs Keeper
- Violentmonkey vs Mercury Reader
- Violentmonkey vs Rakuten
- Violentmonkey vs Hemingway Editor
- Violentmonkey vs Night Eye
- Violentmonkey vs React Developer Tools
- Violentmonkey vs Save to Google Drive
- Violentmonkey vs ColorZilla
- Violentmonkey vs JSON Viewer
- Violentmonkey vs Evernote Web Clipper
- Violentmonkey vs BuiltWith
- Violentmonkey vs Wappalyzer
- Violentmonkey vs Fireshot
- Violentmonkey vs GoFullPage
- Violentmonkey vs HTTPS Everywhere
- Violentmonkey vs Nimbus Screenshot
- Violentmonkey vs Redux DevTools
- WhatFont vs Dark Reader
- WhatFont vs Privacy Badger
- WhatFont vs Awesome Screenshot
- WhatFont vs Tampermonkey
- WhatFont vs LanguageTool
- WhatFont vs uBlock Origin
- WhatFont vs Pocket
- WhatFont vs Raindrop.io
- WhatFont vs Instapaper
- WhatFont vs Honey
- WhatFont vs Keeper
- WhatFont vs Mercury Reader
- WhatFont vs Rakuten
- WhatFont vs Hemingway Editor
- WhatFont vs Night Eye
- WhatFont vs React Developer Tools
- WhatFont vs Save to Google Drive
- WhatFont vs ColorZilla
- WhatFont vs JSON Viewer
- WhatFont vs Evernote Web Clipper
- WhatFont vs BuiltWith
- WhatFont vs Wappalyzer
- WhatFont vs Fireshot
- WhatFont vs GoFullPage
- WhatFont vs HTTPS Everywhere
- WhatFont vs Nimbus Screenshot
- WhatFont vs Redux DevTools


