Browser Extensions · head to head
FireMonkey vs GoFullPage

FireMonkey
Browser Extensions
User scripts and user styles in one Firefox extension
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: FireMonkey firefox only, and requires a recent one: version 93 on desktop, 113 on Android.; GoFullPage no pricing information available on website; full-page screenshot functionality available but cost structure unclear
- They diverge on capability: FireMonkey covers Scripts and styles together, GoFullPage covers Full page capture.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 15 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which FireMonkey and GoFullPage actually diverge.
| Attribute | FireMonkey | GoFullPage |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | freemium |
| Platforms | Firefox | Chrome, Firefox, Edge |
| Founded | Unknown | 2012 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Browser Extensions).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in FireMonkey
- Scripts and styles together
- Monaco editor with ESLint
- Unlimited client-side storage
- Global injection
- Notifications and clipboard
- Firefox for Android
Only in GoFullPage
- Full page capture
- Auto scrolling
- Multiple formats
- One-click capture
- Chrome support
- Firefox support
- Edge support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
FireMonkey
- Running user scripts and user styles without two separate extensionsnot GoFullPage
- Restyling sites with CSS alongside scripted behaviour changesnot GoFullPage
- Editing scripts in a full editor inside the browsernot GoFullPage
- Injecting CSS globally across every sitenot GoFullPage
- Managing a mixed library of scripts and styles from one dashboardnot GoFullPage
GoFullPage
- Capturing entire web pages for bug reportsnot FireMonkey
- Documenting website screenshots for compliance recordsnot FireMonkey
- Creating full-page references for design reviewsnot FireMonkey
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
FireMonkey
- Firefox only, and requires a recent one: version 93 on desktop, 113 on Android.
- Not a drop-in replacement for Greasemonkey, Tampermonkey or Stylus. The project says so itself, so an existing library may need adjusting.
- A much smaller user base than Tampermonkey or Violentmonkey, which means fewer people have hit the bug you are about to hit.
- No Chrome, Edge or Safari build, so it cannot be the answer for anyone working across browsers.
- Combining scripts and styles in one extension also combines the blast radius: one extension with permission to inject both into every page.
GoFullPage
- No pricing information available on website; full-page screenshot functionality available but cost structure unclear
Pricing, plan by plan
FireMonkey
Free- Open sourceFree
- MPL-2.0 licensed
- Unlimited scripts and styles
- No account required
GoFullPage
Free- FreeFree
- Full page capture
- PNG export
- PDF export
Which should you pick?
Choose FireMonkey if
- You need scripts and styles together.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Firefox.
- You also want monaco editor with eslint.
Choose GoFullPage if
- You need full page capture.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Chrome, Firefox, Edge.
- You also want auto scrolling.
Questions people ask
- Is FireMonkey or GoFullPage better?
- Neither clearly leads. FireMonkey starts at Free and GoFullPage at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, FireMonkey or GoFullPage?
- FireMonkey starts at Free and GoFullPage at Free.
- Does FireMonkey or GoFullPage run on more platforms?
- FireMonkey runs on Firefox. GoFullPage runs on Chrome, Firefox, Edge.
- Can I use FireMonkey for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is FireMonkey best used for?
- FireMonkey is most often used for running user scripts and user styles without two separate extensions, restyling sites with css alongside scripted behaviour changes, editing scripts in a full editor inside the browser, injecting css globally across every site. Of those, running user scripts and user styles without two separate extensions and restyling sites with css alongside scripted behaviour changes are not what GoFullPage is typically brought in for.
- What can FireMonkey do that GoFullPage cannot?
- FireMonkey covers Scripts and styles together, Monaco editor with ESLint, Unlimited client-side storage, Global injection. GoFullPage covers Full page capture, Auto scrolling, Multiple formats, One-click capture.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
FireMonkey: What makes FireMonkey different from Violentmonkey?
It manages user styles as well as user scripts. The usual arrangement is a script manager plus a separate style manager such as Stylus; FireMonkey replaces both with one extension.
SourceGoFullPage: How much does GoFullPage cost?
GoFullPage pricing information is not available on the website. GoFullPage is a Chrome extension for full-page screenshot capture, but specific costs, subscription tiers, or feature limits are not disclosed online.
SourceFireMonkey: Which browsers does FireMonkey support?
Firefox only. Desktop requires Firefox 93 or later and Android requires 113, with an API minimum of 102.
SourceFireMonkey: Is FireMonkey open source?
Yes, under the MPL-2.0 licence.
SourceFireMonkey: Will my existing Tampermonkey scripts work?
Not necessarily. The project states that while it shares functionality with Greasemonkey, Tampermonkey and Stylus, there are differences, so scripts and styles written for those may need adjusting.
SourceFireMonkey: What editor does FireMonkey use?
Current versions use the Monaco editor with ESLint, the same editor component that powers VS Code.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- FireMonkey vs Greasemonkey
- FireMonkey vs Violentmonkey
- FireMonkey vs Tampermonkey
- FireMonkey vs Userscripts
- FireMonkey vs Stay
- FireMonkey vs Stylus
- FireMonkey vs Pocket
- FireMonkey vs Dark Reader
- FireMonkey vs Raindrop.io
- FireMonkey vs Privacy Badger
- FireMonkey vs AdBlock Plus
- FireMonkey vs Night Eye
- FireMonkey vs React Developer Tools
- FireMonkey vs Save to Google Drive
- FireMonkey vs Vimeo Record
- FireMonkey vs Vue.js Devtools
- FireMonkey vs Awesome Screenshot
- FireMonkey vs Fireshot
- FireMonkey vs Nimbus Screenshot
- FireMonkey vs Evernote Web Clipper
- FireMonkey vs Instapaper
- FireMonkey vs Momentum
- FireMonkey vs Arc
- FireMonkey vs Mercury Reader
- FireMonkey vs JSON Viewer
- FireMonkey vs Redux DevTools
- FireMonkey vs Wappalyzer
- GoFullPage vs Greasemonkey
- GoFullPage vs Violentmonkey
- GoFullPage vs Tampermonkey
- GoFullPage vs Userscripts
- GoFullPage vs Stay
- GoFullPage vs Stylus
- GoFullPage vs Pocket
- GoFullPage vs Dark Reader
- GoFullPage vs Raindrop.io
- GoFullPage vs Privacy Badger
- GoFullPage vs AdBlock Plus
- GoFullPage vs Night Eye
- GoFullPage vs React Developer Tools
- GoFullPage vs Save to Google Drive
- GoFullPage vs Vimeo Record
- GoFullPage vs Vue.js Devtools
- GoFullPage vs Awesome Screenshot
- GoFullPage vs Fireshot
- GoFullPage vs Nimbus Screenshot
- GoFullPage vs Evernote Web Clipper
- GoFullPage vs Instapaper
- GoFullPage vs Momentum
- GoFullPage vs Arc
- GoFullPage vs Mercury Reader
- GoFullPage vs JSON Viewer
- GoFullPage vs Redux DevTools
- GoFullPage vs Wappalyzer

