Browser Extensions · head to head
BuiltWith vs FireMonkey

FireMonkey
Browser Extensions
User scripts and user styles in one Firefox extension
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: BuiltWith free tier limited to individual site lookups with no features; FireMonkey firefox only, and requires a recent one: version 93 on desktop, 113 on Android.
- They diverge on capability: BuiltWith covers Technology profiling, FireMonkey covers Scripts and styles together.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 15 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which BuiltWith and FireMonkey actually diverge.
| Attribute | BuiltWith | FireMonkey |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | subscription | open-source |
| Platforms | Web | Firefox |
| Founded | 2007 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Browser Extensions).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in BuiltWith
- Technology profiling
- Market research
- Competitor analysis
- Lead generation
- Chrome support
- Firefox support
- Edge support
Only in FireMonkey
- Scripts and styles together
- Monaco editor with ESLint
- Unlimited client-side storage
- Global injection
- Notifications and clipboard
- Firefox for Android
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
BuiltWith
- Technology intelligence and market researchnot FireMonkey
- Competitive analysis and lead generationnot FireMonkey
- Web technology tracking and reportingnot FireMonkey
FireMonkey
- Running user scripts and user styles without two separate extensionsnot BuiltWith
- Restyling sites with CSS alongside scripted behaviour changesnot BuiltWith
- Editing scripts in a full editor inside the browsernot BuiltWith
- Injecting CSS globally across every sitenot BuiltWith
- Managing a mixed library of scripts and styles from one dashboardnot BuiltWith
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
BuiltWith
- Free tier limited to individual site lookups with no features
- Basic plan severely limited: 2 technologies, 2 keywords, 2 reports
- Single login user on Basic and Pro plans
- Minimum paid plan is $295/month
- No monthly payment option mentioned; minimum 1-month term annual
FireMonkey
- Firefox only, and requires a recent one: version 93 on desktop, 113 on Android.
- Not a drop-in replacement for Greasemonkey, Tampermonkey or Stylus. The project says so itself, so an existing library may need adjusting.
- A much smaller user base than Tampermonkey or Violentmonkey, which means fewer people have hit the bug you are about to hit.
- No Chrome, Edge or Safari build, so it cannot be the answer for anyone working across browsers.
- Combining scripts and styles in one extension also combines the blast radius: one extension with permission to inject both into every page.
Pricing, plan by plan
BuiltWith
Free- FreeFree
- Individual site lookups
- Limited data access
- Basic$295/month
- 2 Technologies
- 2 Keywords
- 2 Retail Reports
- Pro$495/month
- Unlimited Technologies
- Unlimited Keywords
- Unlimited Retail Reports
- Team$995/month
- Unlimited access all features
- Unlimited Pro Logins
- CRM Integration
FireMonkey
Free- Open sourceFree
- MPL-2.0 licensed
- Unlimited scripts and styles
- No account required
Which should you pick?
Choose BuiltWith if
- You need technology profiling.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want market research.
Choose FireMonkey if
- You need scripts and styles together.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Firefox.
- You also want monaco editor with eslint.
Questions people ask
- Is BuiltWith or FireMonkey better?
- Neither clearly leads. BuiltWith starts at Free and FireMonkey at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, BuiltWith or FireMonkey?
- BuiltWith starts at Free and FireMonkey at Free.
- Does BuiltWith or FireMonkey run on more platforms?
- BuiltWith runs on Web. FireMonkey runs on Firefox.
- Can I use BuiltWith for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is BuiltWith best used for?
- BuiltWith is most often used for technology intelligence and market research, competitive analysis and lead generation, web technology tracking and reporting. Of those, technology intelligence and market research and competitive analysis and lead generation are not what FireMonkey is typically brought in for.
- What can BuiltWith do that FireMonkey cannot?
- BuiltWith covers Technology profiling, Market research, Competitor analysis, Lead generation. FireMonkey covers Scripts and styles together, Monaco editor with ESLint, Unlimited client-side storage, Global injection.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
BuiltWith: Does BuiltWith offer a free plan?
Yes, BuiltWith offers a free tier for individual website lookups. For full features, paid plans start at $295/month (Basic).
SourceFireMonkey: What makes FireMonkey different from Violentmonkey?
It manages user styles as well as user scripts. The usual arrangement is a script manager plus a separate style manager such as Stylus; FireMonkey replaces both with one extension.
SourceBuiltWith: What are the differences between Basic and Pro plans?
Basic ($295/month) includes 2 technologies, 2 keywords, and 2 retail reports. Pro ($495/month) provides unlimited access to technologies, keywords, and retail reports.
SourceFireMonkey: Which browsers does FireMonkey support?
Firefox only. Desktop requires Firefox 93 or later and Android requires 113, with an API minimum of 102.
SourceBuiltWith: How many users can access BuiltWith simultaneously?
Basic and Pro plans include 1 system login. The Team plan at $995/month provides unlimited Pro Logins for multi-user access.
SourceFireMonkey: Is FireMonkey open source?
Yes, under the MPL-2.0 licence.
SourceBuiltWith: What payment methods does BuiltWith accept?
BuiltWith accepts credit cards (Visa, Mastercard, Amex), PayPal, Bitcoin, and wire transfers for yearly contracts.
SourceFireMonkey: Will my existing Tampermonkey scripts work?
Not necessarily. The project states that while it shares functionality with Greasemonkey, Tampermonkey and Stylus, there are differences, so scripts and styles written for those may need adjusting.
SourceFireMonkey: What editor does FireMonkey use?
Current versions use the Monaco editor with ESLint, the same editor component that powers VS Code.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- BuiltWith vs Wappalyzer
- BuiltWith vs Dark Reader
- BuiltWith vs SimilarWeb
- BuiltWith vs Pocket
- BuiltWith vs Raindrop.io
- BuiltWith vs Privacy Badger
- BuiltWith vs React Developer Tools
- BuiltWith vs Vue.js Devtools
- BuiltWith vs Web Developer
- BuiltWith vs JSON Viewer
- BuiltWith vs Redux DevTools
- BuiltWith vs Ghostery
- BuiltWith vs Mercury Reader
- BuiltWith vs Momentum
- BuiltWith vs ProWritingAid
- BuiltWith vs Rakuten
- BuiltWith vs uBlock Origin
- BuiltWith vs Greasemonkey
- BuiltWith vs Violentmonkey
- BuiltWith vs Tampermonkey
- BuiltWith vs Userscripts
- BuiltWith vs Stay
- BuiltWith vs GoFullPage
- BuiltWith vs Stylus
- BuiltWith vs AdBlock Plus
- BuiltWith vs Night Eye
- BuiltWith vs Save to Google Drive
- BuiltWith vs Vimeo Record
- FireMonkey vs Wappalyzer
- FireMonkey vs Dark Reader
- FireMonkey vs SimilarWeb
- FireMonkey vs Pocket
- FireMonkey vs Raindrop.io
- FireMonkey vs Privacy Badger
- FireMonkey vs React Developer Tools
- FireMonkey vs Vue.js Devtools
- FireMonkey vs Web Developer
- FireMonkey vs JSON Viewer
- FireMonkey vs Redux DevTools
- FireMonkey vs Ghostery
- FireMonkey vs Mercury Reader
- FireMonkey vs Momentum
- FireMonkey vs ProWritingAid
- FireMonkey vs Rakuten
- FireMonkey vs uBlock Origin
- FireMonkey vs Greasemonkey
- FireMonkey vs Violentmonkey
- FireMonkey vs Tampermonkey
- FireMonkey vs Userscripts
- FireMonkey vs Stay
- FireMonkey vs GoFullPage
- FireMonkey vs Stylus
- FireMonkey vs AdBlock Plus
- FireMonkey vs Night Eye
- FireMonkey vs Save to Google Drive
- FireMonkey vs Vimeo Record

