Developer Tools · head to head
Fig vs NICE Actimize
Fig
Developer Tools
IDE-style autocomplete for your existing terminal
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

NICE Actimize
Cybersecurity
Financial crime, risk and compliance suite for regulated institutions
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Fig has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Fig shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete; NICE Actimize modules are licensed separately, so a bank that starts with AML and later needs fraud and surveillance faces three negotiations and a bill that compounds rather than a suite price.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fig and NICE Actimize actually diverge.
| Attribute | Fig | NICE Actimize |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | freemium | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web | Web, Linux, Windows |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | 2020 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fig
Nothing recorded that NICE Actimize does not also cover.
Only in NICE Actimize
- Suspicious activity monitoring
- Watchlist filtering
- Customer due diligence
- Payment fraud detection
- Markets surveillance
- Case management
- X-Sight marketplace
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fig
No use cases recorded yet. See the Fig review.
NICE Actimize
- A bank under a regulatory consent order that needs a monitoring system with an audit trail examiners already recognisenot Fig
- A broker dealer required to implement trade surveillance covering both orders and trader communicationsnot Fig
- A regional bank outgrowing spreadsheet-based sanctions screening and needing documented model governancenot Fig
- A payments firm needing real time fraud scoring on faster payments alongside batch AML monitoringnot Fig
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fig
- Shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete
- The standalone desktop app is no longer available or supported
- The completion specs remain open source on GitHub, but the product that consumed them is gone
NICE Actimize
- Modules are licensed separately, so a bank that starts with AML and later needs fraud and surveillance faces three negotiations and a bill that compounds rather than a suite price.
- Tuning and model validation are consultant-heavy, and the services spend over a deployment often exceeds the first year licence cost.
- The older on premises deployments carry batch-oriented architecture that makes true real time decisioning harder than in newer cloud native rivals.
- Rule and model changes go through a controlled release process, so a bank reacting to a new fraud typology may wait weeks for a change that a modern platform would ship in days.
- Because it is the incumbent at so many institutions, criminals have a good working understanding of what the standard rule sets detect, and undifferentiated out of the box configurations catch predictable behaviour.
Pricing, plan by plan
Fig
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Fig review.
NICE Actimize
On request- NICE Actimize$undefined/year
- Licensed per module, not as one suite
- Scaled by institution asset size or transaction volume
- On premises or Actimize cloud deployment
Which should you pick?
Choose NICE Actimize if
- You need suspicious activity monitoring.
- You work on Web, Linux, Windows.
- You also want watchlist filtering.
Questions people ask
- Is Fig or NICE Actimize better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fig starts at Free and NICE Actimize at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fig or NICE Actimize?
- Fig has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Fig and On request for NICE Actimize.
- Does Fig or NICE Actimize run on more platforms?
- Fig runs on Web. NICE Actimize runs on Web, Linux, Windows.
- Can I use Fig for free?
- Yes. Fig has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. NICE Actimize starts at On request.
- What can Fig do that NICE Actimize cannot?
- NICE Actimize covers Suspicious activity monitoring, Watchlist filtering, Customer due diligence, Payment fraud detection.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
NICE Actimize: Is Actimize one product?
No. It is a family of separately licensed modules covering AML, fraud, due diligence and surveillance. You buy what you need and each has its own price.
NICE Actimize: Can it run in the cloud?
Yes, Actimize offers cloud deployment, though a large share of the installed base still runs on premises for data residency reasons.
NICE Actimize: Who owns it?
NICE Ltd, an Israeli company listed on Nasdaq. Actimize is its financial crime division.
Related pages
More on NICE Actimize
Other head to heads
- Fig vs Visual Studio Code
- Fig vs ESLint
- Fig vs Turborepo
- Fig vs pnpm
- Fig vs Sweep
- Fig vs Cody
- Fig vs Warp
- Fig vs Keycloak
- Fig vs Rust
- Fig vs CodeSandbox
- Fig vs Vite
- Fig vs Daytona
- Fig vs Visual Studio
- Fig vs Xlinesoft
- Fig vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Fig vs Sourcegraph
- Fig vs Silent Eight
- Fig vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Fig vs Quantexa
- Fig vs Feedzai
- Fig vs Unit21
- Fig vs Fenergo
- Fig vs Sardine
- Fig vs ThetaRay
- Fig vs Transmit Security
- Fig vs Socure
- Fig vs Sumsub
- Fig vs Jumio
- Fig vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Fig vs Recorded Future
- Fig vs RoboForm
- Fig vs Semperis
- Fig vs SentinelOne
- NICE Actimize vs Visual Studio Code
- NICE Actimize vs ESLint
- NICE Actimize vs Turborepo
- NICE Actimize vs pnpm
- NICE Actimize vs Sweep
- NICE Actimize vs Cody
- NICE Actimize vs Warp
- NICE Actimize vs Keycloak
- NICE Actimize vs Rust
- NICE Actimize vs CodeSandbox
- NICE Actimize vs Vite
- NICE Actimize vs Daytona
- NICE Actimize vs Visual Studio
- NICE Actimize vs Xlinesoft
- NICE Actimize vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- NICE Actimize vs Sourcegraph
- NICE Actimize vs Silent Eight
- NICE Actimize vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- NICE Actimize vs Quantexa
- NICE Actimize vs Feedzai
- NICE Actimize vs Unit21
- NICE Actimize vs Fenergo
- NICE Actimize vs Sardine
- NICE Actimize vs ThetaRay
- NICE Actimize vs Transmit Security
- NICE Actimize vs Socure
- NICE Actimize vs Sumsub
- NICE Actimize vs Jumio
- NICE Actimize vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- NICE Actimize vs Recorded Future
- NICE Actimize vs RoboForm
- NICE Actimize vs Semperis
- NICE Actimize vs SentinelOne
