Developer Tools · head to head
Sweep vs Transmit Security

Transmit Security
Cybersecurity
Customer identity platform built around passwordless and fraud signals
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Sweep has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Sweep limited to JetBrains IDEs only, not available for VS Code or other editors; Transmit Security pricing is not published, so it cannot be compared early against competitors that post per monthly active user rates, and the eventual quote often mixes per-user and per-transaction units.
- They diverge on capability: Sweep covers Autocomplete, Transmit Security covers Passwordless authentication.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Sweep and Transmit Security actually diverge.
| Attribute | Sweep | Transmit Security |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Freemium with paid tiers | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | JetBrains IDEs | Web, iOS, Android |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | 2023 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Sweep
- Autocomplete
- AI Agent
- Full codebase indexing
- Code review functionality
- Multi-IDE support
- GitHub integration
Only in Transmit Security
- Passwordless authentication
- Detection and response
- Identity verification
- Orchestration
- Account recovery
- Bot and automation detection
- Composable APIs
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Sweep
- Accelerating code completion for JetBrains developersnot Transmit Security
- Automating refactoring tasks across codebasesnot Transmit Security
- Handling bug fixes with full repository contextnot Transmit Security
- Code review and quality assurancenot Transmit Security
Transmit Security
- A bank moving a consumer base off passwords to passkeys without losing customers at the migration stepnot Sweep
- An insurer whose account recovery flow is the main account takeover route and needs risk scoring inside itnot Sweep
- A retailer that wants bot detection at login rather than only at checkoutnot Sweep
- An organisation replacing an in-house customer login system that has become an unfunded engineering liabilitynot Sweep
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Sweep
- Limited to JetBrains IDEs only, not available for VS Code or other editors
- Free tier limited to 1,000 autocompletes per month
- API credit consumption varies by feature usage
- Performance dependent on codebase size and indexing quality
Transmit Security
- Pricing is not published, so it cannot be compared early against competitors that post per monthly active user rates, and the eventual quote often mixes per-user and per-transaction units.
- Migrating a live consumer identity base is a high risk project, and credential migration constraints mean some users must re-register, which shows up as measurable churn.
- The vendor is smaller than the identity incumbents, so the partner and systems integrator pool is thinner and staffing a large programme is harder.
- Workforce identity is not the focus, so an organisation wanting one vendor for employees and customers will still run two platforms.
- The fraud detection value depends on traffic volume feeding the models, so a smaller deployment gets less benefit from exactly the capability that justified choosing it over a plain identity provider.
Pricing, plan by plan
Sweep
Free- FreeFree
- 1,000 autocompletes
- 5 USD API credits included
- All JetBrains IDEs supported
- Pro$20/month
- Unlimited autocomplete
- Higher API credit allocation
- Priority support
- Ultra$60/month
- Unlimited autocomplete
- Maximum API credit allocation
- Extended context window
Transmit Security
On request- Transmit Security Platform$undefined/year
- Priced per monthly active user or per transaction by service
- Services licensed individually or as a platform
- Free developer tier for evaluation
Which should you pick?
Choose Sweep if
- You need autocomplete.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on JetBrains IDEs.
- You also want ai agent.
Choose Transmit Security if
- You need passwordless authentication.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want detection and response.
Questions people ask
- Is Sweep or Transmit Security better?
- Neither clearly leads. Sweep starts at Free and Transmit Security at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Sweep or Transmit Security?
- Sweep has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Sweep and On request for Transmit Security.
- Does Sweep or Transmit Security run on more platforms?
- Sweep runs on JetBrains IDEs. Transmit Security runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Sweep for free?
- Yes. Sweep has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Transmit Security starts at On request.
- What is Sweep best used for?
- Sweep is most often used for accelerating code completion for jetbrains developers, automating refactoring tasks across codebases, handling bug fixes with full repository context, code review and quality assurance. Of those, accelerating code completion for jetbrains developers and automating refactoring tasks across codebases are not what Transmit Security is typically brought in for.
- What can Sweep do that Transmit Security cannot?
- Sweep covers Autocomplete, AI Agent, Full codebase indexing, Code review functionality. Transmit Security covers Passwordless authentication, Detection and response, Identity verification, Orchestration.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Sweep: What programming languages does Sweep support?
Sweep works with all programming languages supported by JetBrains IDEs, including Python, Java, JavaScript, Go, Kotlin, C++, and many others.
SourceTransmit Security: Do we have to replace our existing identity provider?
No. The services are composable, so detection and response or verification can be adopted alongside an existing provider such as Okta or Entra ID.
Sweep: Does Sweep retain my code data?
No. Sweep is SOC 2 Type II certified with zero data retention. Code is processed for suggestions but not stored.
SourceTransmit Security: Is fraud detection an extra licence?
It is a separate service, but it is designed to run inside the authentication flow rather than as a bolted-on second vendor. Confirm which services are in your quote.
Sweep: Can I cancel my Sweep subscription anytime?
Yes. You can cancel your subscription at any time from your account settings with no long-term commitments or cancellation fees.
SourceTransmit Security: Is there a way to try it?
Yes, a free developer tier exists for evaluation, though production use is an enterprise agreement.
Related pages
More on Transmit Security
Other head to heads
- Sweep vs GitHub Copilot
- Sweep vs Refact
- Sweep vs PhpStorm
- Sweep vs JetBrains Rider
- Sweep vs Pieces for Developers
- Sweep vs Cody
- Sweep vs Deep Code
- Sweep vs Pants Build
- Sweep vs Fig
- Sweep vs Namespace
- Sweep vs Nix
- Sweep vs Nixpacks
- Sweep vs Octopus Deploy
- Sweep vs Okteto
- Sweep vs OpsLevel
- Sweep vs RubyMine
- Sweep vs Sourcegraph
- Sweep vs GoLand
- Sweep vs Descope
- Sweep vs NICE Actimize
- Sweep vs Beyond Identity
- Sweep vs Sardine
- Sweep vs Feedzai
- Sweep vs Socure
- Sweep vs Unit21
- Sweep vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Sweep vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Sweep vs Ping Identity
- Sweep vs Stytch
- Sweep vs Rhombus Systems
- Sweep vs Semgrep
- Sweep vs Spot AI
- Sweep vs Syft
- Sweep vs ThetaRay
- Sweep vs Trivy
- Sweep vs Trulioo
- Transmit Security vs GitHub Copilot
- Transmit Security vs Refact
- Transmit Security vs PhpStorm
- Transmit Security vs JetBrains Rider
- Transmit Security vs Pieces for Developers
- Transmit Security vs Cody
- Transmit Security vs Deep Code
- Transmit Security vs Pants Build
- Transmit Security vs Fig
- Transmit Security vs Namespace
- Transmit Security vs Nix
- Transmit Security vs Nixpacks
- Transmit Security vs Octopus Deploy
- Transmit Security vs Okteto
- Transmit Security vs OpsLevel
- Transmit Security vs RubyMine
- Transmit Security vs Sourcegraph
- Transmit Security vs GoLand
- Transmit Security vs Descope
- Transmit Security vs NICE Actimize
- Transmit Security vs Beyond Identity
- Transmit Security vs Sardine
- Transmit Security vs Feedzai
- Transmit Security vs Socure
- Transmit Security vs Unit21
- Transmit Security vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Transmit Security vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Transmit Security vs Ping Identity
- Transmit Security vs Stytch
- Transmit Security vs Rhombus Systems
- Transmit Security vs Semgrep
- Transmit Security vs Spot AI
- Transmit Security vs Syft
- Transmit Security vs ThetaRay
- Transmit Security vs Trivy
- Transmit Security vs Trulioo

