Software · head to head
Fig vs Okta
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Fig shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete; Okta requires $1,500 annual minimum contract
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fig and Okta actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fig
Nothing recorded that Okta does not also cover.
Only in Okta
- Single sign-on (SSO)
- Multi-factor authentication
- Lifecycle management
- Universal directory
- API access management
- B2B integration
- Passwordless authentication
- Adaptive MFA
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fig
No use cases recorded yet. See the Fig review.
Okta
- Employee SSOnot Fig
- Customer identitynot Fig
- B2B integrationnot Fig
- Zero Trust securitynot Fig
- Compliancenot Fig
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fig
- Shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete
- The standalone desktop app is no longer available or supported
- The completion specs remain open source on GitHub, but the product that consumed them is gone
Okta
- Requires $1,500 annual minimum contract
- Admin-only MFA can be vulnerable to push notification fatigue attacks
- Implementation requires significant services and integration fees in year one
Pricing, plan by plan
Fig
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Fig review.
Okta
Free- Starter Suite$6/user/month
- SSO
- MFA
- Universal Directory
- Core Essentials Suite$14/user/month
- Adaptive MFA
- Privileged Access
- Lifecycle Management
- Essentials Suite$17/user/month
- Same as Core Essentials
- Most popular
- Professional Suite$null/custom
- Device Access
- Identity Security Posture
- Threat Protection
Which should you pick?
Choose Okta if
- You need single sign-on (sso).
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, SaaS.
- You also want multi-factor authentication.
Questions people ask
- Is Fig or Okta better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fig starts at Free and Okta at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fig or Okta?
- Fig starts at Free and Okta at Free.
- Does Fig or Okta run on more platforms?
- Fig runs on Web. Okta runs on Web, SaaS.
- Can I use Fig for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What can Fig do that Okta cannot?
- Okta covers Single sign-on (SSO), Multi-factor authentication, Lifecycle management, Universal directory.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Okta: What is the minimum contract for Okta Workforce Identity?
Okta requires a $1,500 annual minimum contract for Workforce Identity plans. Pricing starts at $6 per user per month (Starter) and ranges to $17 per user per month (Essentials), billed annually.
SourceOkta: Does Okta offer a free trial?
Yes, Okta provides a 30-day free trial so customers can explore all product capabilities before committing to a paid plan.
SourceOkta: How many pre-built integrations does Okta support?
Okta offers over 7,000 pre-built integrations with popular enterprise applications including Salesforce, Slack, Workday, Box, Confluence, and Zendesk.
SourceOkta: What security features does Okta provide for admins?
Okta provides multi-factor authentication, adaptive MFA, single logout, and identity threat detection and response. However, only 94% of Okta customers have MFA enabled for administrators.
SourceOkta: Can Okta integrate with on-premises directories?
Yes, Okta's Universal Directory and lifecycle management support cloud and on-premises identity sources, including Active Directory and LDAP.
SourceRelated pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Fig vs Visual Studio Code
- Fig vs ESLint
- Fig vs pnpm
- Fig vs Turborepo
- Fig vs Yarn
- Fig vs Ansible
- Fig vs Prettier
- Fig vs Vite
- Fig vs Webpack
- Fig vs Argo CD
- Fig vs Azure DevOps
- Fig vs Bitbucket
- Fig vs Buildkite
- Fig vs Claude Code
- Fig vs Cody
- Fig vs Deno
- Fig vs Git
- Fig vs GitHub Copilot
- Fig vs Asana
- Fig vs ClickUp
- Fig vs Figma
- Fig vs Linear
- Fig vs Monday.com
- Fig vs Greenhouse
- Fig vs Notion
- Fig vs Amplitude
- Fig vs Datadog
- Fig vs PostHog
- Fig vs PyCharm
- Fig vs Sketch
- Fig vs Docker
- Fig vs Netlify
- Fig vs Aha!
- Fig vs Coda
- Fig vs Dashlane
- Fig vs GitHub
- Okta vs Visual Studio Code
- Okta vs ESLint
- Okta vs pnpm
- Okta vs Turborepo
- Okta vs Yarn
- Okta vs Ansible
- Okta vs Prettier
- Okta vs Vite
- Okta vs Webpack
- Okta vs Argo CD
- Okta vs Azure DevOps
- Okta vs Bitbucket
- Okta vs Buildkite
- Okta vs Claude Code
- Okta vs Cody
- Okta vs Deno
- Okta vs Git
- Okta vs GitHub Copilot
- Okta vs Asana
- Okta vs ClickUp
- Okta vs Figma
- Okta vs Linear
- Okta vs Monday.com
- Okta vs Greenhouse
- Okta vs Notion
- Okta vs Amplitude
- Okta vs Datadog
- Okta vs PostHog
- Okta vs PyCharm
- Okta vs Sketch
- Okta vs Docker
- Okta vs Netlify
- Okta vs Aha!
- Okta vs Coda
- Okta vs Dashlane
- Okta vs GitHub

