Technology · head to head
Eclipse vs Fig

Eclipse
Technology
The Eclipse Foundation - home to a global community
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
Fig
Developer Tools
IDE-style autocomplete for your existing terminal
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Eclipse high memory consumption and CPU usage, especially with multiple plugins installed; Fig shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Eclipse and Fig actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Eclipse
- Java development environment
- Extensible plugin architecture
- Integrated debugger
- Code refactoring
- Version control integration
- Build automation
- Multi-language support
- Rich client platform
Only in Fig
Nothing recorded that Eclipse does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Eclipse
- Java application developmentnot Fig
- Enterprise software developmentnot Fig
- Web application developmentnot Fig
- Plugin developmentnot Fig
- Educational programmingnot Fig
Fig
No use cases recorded yet. See the Fig review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Eclipse
- High memory consumption and CPU usage, especially with multiple plugins installed
- Slow startup times and performance degradation with large projects or many open editors
- Requires configuration of eclipse.ini file to optimize heap sizes for adequate performance
- User interface considered outdated compared to modern IDE alternatives
- User base fell from 39% of Java developers in 2024 to 28% in 2025, indicating market decline
Fig
- Shut down on 1 September 2024. Amazon acquired Fig in August 2023 and folded it into Amazon Q Developer, which now carries the terminal autocomplete
- The standalone desktop app is no longer available or supported
- The completion specs remain open source on GitHub, but the product that consumed them is gone
Pricing, plan by plan
Eclipse
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Eclipse review.
Fig
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Fig review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Eclipse if
- You need java development environment.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want extensible plugin architecture.
Questions people ask
- Is Eclipse or Fig better?
- Neither clearly leads. Eclipse starts at Free and Fig at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Eclipse or Fig?
- Eclipse starts at Free and Fig at Free.
- Does Eclipse or Fig run on more platforms?
- Eclipse runs on Windows, macOS, Linux. Fig runs on Web.
- Can I use Eclipse for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Eclipse best used for?
- Eclipse is most often used for java application development, enterprise software development, web application development, plugin development. Of those, java application development and enterprise software development are not what Fig is typically brought in for.
- What can Eclipse do that Fig cannot?
- Eclipse covers Java development environment, Extensible plugin architecture, Integrated debugger, Code refactoring.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Eclipse: How much does Eclipse IDE cost?
Eclipse IDE is completely free and open-source, released under the Eclipse Public License 2.0.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Eclipse vs GitHub
- Eclipse vs JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA
- Eclipse vs Docker
- Eclipse vs Plane
- Eclipse vs Postgres
- Eclipse vs Storybook
- Eclipse vs Okta
- Eclipse vs Kubernetes
- Eclipse vs PostHog
- Eclipse vs Jira
- Eclipse vs Zeta
- Eclipse vs CloudAMQP
- Eclipse vs Dropbox
- Eclipse vs Jenkins
- Eclipse vs Lovable
- Eclipse vs Miro
- Eclipse vs PyCharm
- Eclipse vs WebStorm
- Eclipse vs Visual Studio Code
- Eclipse vs ESLint
- Eclipse vs Turborepo
- Eclipse vs pnpm
- Eclipse vs Sweep
- Eclipse vs Cody
- Eclipse vs Warp
- Eclipse vs Keycloak
- Eclipse vs Rust
- Eclipse vs CodeSandbox
- Eclipse vs Vite
- Eclipse vs Daytona
- Eclipse vs Visual Studio
- Eclipse vs Xlinesoft
- Eclipse vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Eclipse vs Sourcegraph
- Fig vs GitHub
- Fig vs JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA
- Fig vs Docker
- Fig vs Plane
- Fig vs Postgres
- Fig vs Storybook
- Fig vs Okta
- Fig vs Kubernetes
- Fig vs PostHog
- Fig vs Jira
- Fig vs Zeta
- Fig vs CloudAMQP
- Fig vs Dropbox
- Fig vs Jenkins
- Fig vs Lovable
- Fig vs Miro
- Fig vs PyCharm
- Fig vs WebStorm
- Fig vs Visual Studio Code
- Fig vs ESLint
- Fig vs Turborepo
- Fig vs pnpm
- Fig vs Sweep
- Fig vs Cody
- Fig vs Warp
- Fig vs Keycloak
- Fig vs Rust
- Fig vs CodeSandbox
- Fig vs Vite
- Fig vs Daytona
- Fig vs Visual Studio
- Fig vs Xlinesoft
- Fig vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Fig vs Sourcegraph
