Software · head to head
FaunaDB vs Linode

FaunaDB
Software
The distributed serverless database for modern applications
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: FaunaDB the Internet Archive's capture of FaunaDB's homepage on 5 January 2019 confirmed a free 'Try Cloud' tier alongside a self-hosted download, with a separate Pricing page linked but not itself retrievable from the archive within two attempts.; Linode linode.com/pricing returns a 301 redirect to akamai.com/cloud/pricing; the service is now sold as Akamai Cloud
- They diverge on capability: FaunaDB covers ACID Transactions, Linode covers Compute instances.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which FaunaDB and Linode actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in FaunaDB
- ACID Transactions
- Document-relational Model
- GraphQL API
- Global Distribution
- Temporal Queries
- Multi-tenancy
- Serverless
- GraphQL
Only in Linode
- Compute instances
- Object storage
- Block storage
- Kubernetes
- Managed database
- Load balancers
- Firewalls
- Private networks
Both cover
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
FaunaDB
- Serverless applicationsnot Linode
- Rapid prototypingnot Linode
- Mobile backendsnot Linode
- JAMstacknot Linode
- Microservicesnot Linode
Linode
- Running Linux virtual machines on hourly billed shared or dedicated CPU plansnot FaunaDB
- Managed Kubernetes, block storage and object storage on a single cloud accountnot FaunaDB
- Hosting workloads in a specific one of the listed global regionsnot FaunaDB
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
FaunaDB
- The Internet Archive's capture of FaunaDB's homepage on 5 January 2019 confirmed a free 'Try Cloud' tier alongside a self-hosted download, with a separate Pricing page linked but not itself retrievable from the archive within two attempts.
Linode
- linode.com/pricing returns a 301 redirect to akamai.com/cloud/pricing; the service is now sold as Akamai Cloud
- Charges accrue for any service on the account even when it is powered off, because RAM and network capacity stay reserved; only deleting the service stops billing
- Network transfer beyond the monthly allotment is billed from $0.005 per GB and the rate varies by region
- The Akamai Cloud pricing landing page shows no rates and directs visitors to regional pricing pages or sales
Pricing, plan by plan
FaunaDB
Free- FreeFree
- 100K read ops
- 50K write ops
- 1GB storage
- Pro$25/month
- Pay per use
- Priority support
- Advanced features
Linode
Free- Nanode 1GB$5/month
- 1GB RAM
- 1 vCPU
- 25GB SSD
- Linode 4GB$20/month
- 4GB RAM
- 2 vCPU
- 80GB SSD
Which should you pick?
Choose FaunaDB if
- You need acid transactions.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want document-relational model.
Choose Linode if
- You need compute instances.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api, Cli.
- You also want object storage.
Questions people ask
- Is FaunaDB or Linode better?
- Neither clearly leads. FaunaDB starts at Free and Linode at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, FaunaDB or Linode?
- FaunaDB starts at Free and Linode at Free.
- Does FaunaDB or Linode run on more platforms?
- FaunaDB runs on Web. Linode runs on Web, Api, Cli.
- Can I use FaunaDB for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is FaunaDB best used for?
- FaunaDB is most often used for serverless applications, rapid prototyping, mobile backends, jamstack. Of those, serverless applications and rapid prototyping are not what Linode is typically brought in for.
- What can FaunaDB do that Linode cannot?
- FaunaDB covers ACID Transactions, Document-relational Model, GraphQL API, Global Distribution. Linode covers Compute instances, Object storage, Block storage, Kubernetes. Both handle Web support.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- FaunaDB vs Cockroach Labs
- FaunaDB vs PostgreSQL
- FaunaDB vs Airtable
- FaunaDB vs Amazon Aurora
- FaunaDB vs Elasticsearch
- FaunaDB vs PlanetScale
- FaunaDB vs Azure SQL
- FaunaDB vs ClickHouse
- FaunaDB vs Couchbase
- FaunaDB vs DuckDB
- FaunaDB vs DynamoDB
- FaunaDB vs MariaDB
- FaunaDB vs Oracle Database
- FaunaDB vs Amazon RDS
- FaunaDB vs Amazon Redshift
- FaunaDB vs Apache Druid
- FaunaDB vs Cassandra
- FaunaDB vs CouchDB
- FaunaDB vs Grafana Cloud
- FaunaDB vs Neon
- FaunaDB vs DigitalOcean
- FaunaDB vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- FaunaDB vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- FaunaDB vs Deno Deploy
- FaunaDB vs Heroku
- FaunaDB vs Hetzner Cloud
- FaunaDB vs Packer
- FaunaDB vs Pulumi
- FaunaDB vs Render
- FaunaDB vs Upstash
- FaunaDB vs Vagrant
- FaunaDB vs Vultr
- FaunaDB vs Akamai
- FaunaDB vs Alibaba Cloud
- FaunaDB vs Chef
- FaunaDB vs Contabo
- Linode vs Cockroach Labs
- Linode vs PostgreSQL
- Linode vs Airtable
- Linode vs Amazon Aurora
- Linode vs Elasticsearch
- Linode vs PlanetScale
- Linode vs Azure SQL
- Linode vs ClickHouse
- Linode vs Couchbase
- Linode vs DuckDB
- Linode vs DynamoDB
- Linode vs MariaDB
- Linode vs Oracle Database
- Linode vs Amazon RDS
- Linode vs Amazon Redshift
- Linode vs Apache Druid
- Linode vs Cassandra
- Linode vs CouchDB
- Linode vs Grafana Cloud
- Linode vs Neon
- Linode vs DigitalOcean
- Linode vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Linode vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Linode vs Deno Deploy
- Linode vs Heroku
- Linode vs Hetzner Cloud
- Linode vs Packer
- Linode vs Pulumi
- Linode vs Render
- Linode vs Upstash
- Linode vs Vagrant
- Linode vs Vultr
- Linode vs Akamai
- Linode vs Alibaba Cloud
- Linode vs Chef
- Linode vs Contabo

