Software · head to head
DynamoDB vs FaunaDB

DynamoDB
Software
Fast, flexible NoSQL database service for any scale
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

FaunaDB
Software
The distributed serverless database for modern applications
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only FaunaDB has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: DynamoDB noSQL-only; does not support complex relational queries or SQL joins; FaunaDB the Internet Archive's capture of FaunaDB's homepage on 5 January 2019 confirmed a free 'Try Cloud' tier alongside a self-hosted download, with a separate Pricing page linked but not itself retrievable from the archive within two attempts.
- They diverge on capability: DynamoDB covers Single-digit Millisecond Latency, FaunaDB covers ACID Transactions.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which DynamoDB and FaunaDB actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in DynamoDB
- Single-digit Millisecond Latency
- Auto-scaling
- Global Tables
- Point-in-time Recovery
- Encryption
- Streams
- Lambda
- API Gateway
Only in FaunaDB
- ACID Transactions
- Document-relational Model
- GraphQL API
- Global Distribution
- Temporal Queries
- Multi-tenancy
- GraphQL
- Netlify
Both cover
- Serverless
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
DynamoDB
- High-scale, variable-workload applicationsnot FaunaDB
- Mobile and IoT device backendsnot FaunaDB
- Real-time analytics and dashboardsnot FaunaDB
- Multi-region, globally distributed applicationsnot FaunaDB
FaunaDB
- Serverless applicationsnot DynamoDB
- Rapid prototypingnot DynamoDB
- Mobile backendsnot DynamoDB
- JAMstacknot DynamoDB
- Microservicesnot DynamoDB
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
DynamoDB
- NoSQL-only; does not support complex relational queries or SQL joins
- Limited query flexibility; requires thinking in terms of keys and indexes rather than ad-hoc queries
FaunaDB
- The Internet Archive's capture of FaunaDB's homepage on 5 January 2019 confirmed a free 'Try Cloud' tier alongside a self-hosted download, with a separate Pricing page linked but not itself retrievable from the archive within two attempts.
Pricing, plan by plan
DynamoDB
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the DynamoDB review.
FaunaDB
Free- FreeFree
- 100K read ops
- 50K write ops
- 1GB storage
- Pro$25/month
- Pay per use
- Priority support
- Advanced features
Which should you pick?
Choose DynamoDB if
- You need single-digit millisecond latency.
- You work on AWS.
- You also want auto-scaling.
Choose FaunaDB if
- You need acid transactions.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want document-relational model.
Questions people ask
- Is DynamoDB or FaunaDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. DynamoDB starts at On request and FaunaDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, DynamoDB or FaunaDB?
- FaunaDB has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for DynamoDB and Free for FaunaDB.
- Does DynamoDB or FaunaDB run on more platforms?
- DynamoDB runs on AWS. FaunaDB runs on Web.
- Can I use FaunaDB for free?
- Yes. FaunaDB has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. DynamoDB starts at On request.
- What is DynamoDB best used for?
- DynamoDB is most often used for high-scale, variable-workload applications, mobile and iot device backends, real-time analytics and dashboards, multi-region, globally distributed applications. Of those, high-scale, variable-workload applications and mobile and iot device backends are not what FaunaDB is typically brought in for.
- What can DynamoDB do that FaunaDB cannot?
- DynamoDB covers Single-digit Millisecond Latency, Auto-scaling, Global Tables, Point-in-time Recovery. FaunaDB covers ACID Transactions, Document-relational Model, GraphQL API, Global Distribution. Both handle Serverless, Web support.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- DynamoDB vs Cockroach Labs
- DynamoDB vs PostgreSQL
- DynamoDB vs Airtable
- DynamoDB vs Amazon Aurora
- DynamoDB vs Elasticsearch
- DynamoDB vs PlanetScale
- DynamoDB vs Azure SQL
- DynamoDB vs ClickHouse
- DynamoDB vs Couchbase
- DynamoDB vs DuckDB
- DynamoDB vs MariaDB
- DynamoDB vs Oracle Database
- DynamoDB vs Amazon RDS
- DynamoDB vs Amazon Redshift
- DynamoDB vs Apache Druid
- DynamoDB vs Cassandra
- DynamoDB vs CouchDB
- DynamoDB vs Firebolt
- FaunaDB vs Cockroach Labs
- FaunaDB vs PostgreSQL
- FaunaDB vs Airtable
- FaunaDB vs Amazon Aurora
- FaunaDB vs Elasticsearch
- FaunaDB vs PlanetScale
- FaunaDB vs Azure SQL
- FaunaDB vs ClickHouse
- FaunaDB vs Couchbase
- FaunaDB vs DuckDB
- FaunaDB vs MariaDB
- FaunaDB vs Oracle Database
- FaunaDB vs Amazon RDS
- FaunaDB vs Amazon Redshift
- FaunaDB vs Apache Druid
- FaunaDB vs Cassandra
- FaunaDB vs CouchDB
- FaunaDB vs Firebolt
