Databases · head to head
FaunaDB vs Microsoft Azure

FaunaDB
Databases
Document-relational database whose hosted service closed in 2025 and whose core is now unmaintained Apache 2.0 code.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: FaunaDB the hosted service was wound down in 2025, so there is no managed Fauna to buy; every remaining user either operates a JVM cluster themselves or migrates, and both are projects rather than tasks.; Microsoft Azure the 12 months of free services is available only to new customers who have not previously had an Azure account or received 12 months of free services
- They diverge on capability: FaunaDB covers Document-relational model, Microsoft Azure covers Virtual Machines.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which FaunaDB and Microsoft Azure actually diverge.
| Attribute | FaunaDB | Microsoft Azure |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | usage-based |
| Platforms | Web | Web, Api, Desktop, Mobile |
| Category | Databases | Cloud |
| Founded | 2012 | 2010 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in FaunaDB
- Document-relational model
- FQL v10
- Distributed ACID transactions
- HTTPS access
- User-defined functions
- Attribute-based access control
- Document history
- Event streaming
Only in Microsoft Azure
- Virtual Machines
- App Service
- SQL Database
- Blob Storage
- Azure Cosmos DB
- Functions
- Service Fabric
- API Management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
FaunaDB
- Keeping an existing Fauna-backed application alive on self-hosted infrastructure while a migration is planned and fundednot Microsoft Azure
- Extracting historical data from a Fauna dataset that can no longer be reached through the hosted APInot Microsoft Azure
- Studying a production implementation of deterministic distributed transactions, since the full server source is now readable under Apache 2.0not Microsoft Azure
- Forking the engine deliberately, where an organisation has JVM and distributed-systems staff and wants a document-relational store it fully controlsnot Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
- Cloud infrastructure and computingnot FaunaDB
- Database and storage servicesnot FaunaDB
- AI and machine learning servicesnot FaunaDB
- Enterprise application hostingnot FaunaDB
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
FaunaDB
- The hosted service was wound down in 2025, so there is no managed Fauna to buy; every remaining user either operates a JVM cluster themselves or migrates, and both are projects rather than tasks.
- The open-sourced repository has had no substantive activity since May 2025 and the drivers were frozen alongside it, so you inherit responsibility for security patches in a Scala distributed database that almost nobody else is running.
- FQL has no wire or dialect compatibility with anything else, so migrating off is a rewrite of every query, index and access rule in the application rather than a data export.
- No BI tool, ORM or CDC connector speaks FQL, so reporting and analytics always required exporting the data first, and that export tooling is now also unmaintained.
- The community was small before the shutdown and has dispersed since, so operational answers, tuning advice and people who have run a Fauna cluster in anger are all scarce when something breaks.
Microsoft Azure
- The 12 months of free services is available only to new customers who have not previously had an Azure account or received 12 months of free services
- The 12 months free offer is not available to customers who sign up directly for pay as you go in China and India
- Customers who try Azure free must move to pay as you go within 30 days to keep receiving the 12 months of free services
- Free services are capped at specified monthly amounts, and only some of them are always free
Pricing, plan by plan
FaunaDB
Free- FreeFree
- 100K read ops
- 50K write ops
- 1GB storage
- Pro$25/month
- Pay per use
- Priority support
- Advanced features
Microsoft Azure
Free- Free AccountFree
- $200 credit for 30 days
- Popular services 12 months free
- 40+ services always free
Which should you pick?
Choose FaunaDB if
- You need document-relational model.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want fql v10.
Choose Microsoft Azure if
- You need virtual machines.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api, Desktop, Mobile.
- You also want app service.
Questions people ask
- Is FaunaDB or Microsoft Azure better?
- Neither clearly leads. FaunaDB starts at Free and Microsoft Azure at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, FaunaDB or Microsoft Azure?
- FaunaDB starts at Free and Microsoft Azure at Free.
- Does FaunaDB or Microsoft Azure run on more platforms?
- FaunaDB runs on Web. Microsoft Azure runs on Web, Api, Desktop, Mobile.
- Can I use FaunaDB for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is FaunaDB best used for?
- FaunaDB is most often used for keeping an existing fauna-backed application alive on self-hosted infrastructure while a migration is planned and funded, extracting historical data from a fauna dataset that can no longer be reached through the hosted api, studying a production implementation of deterministic distributed transactions, since the full server source is now readable under apache 2.0, forking the engine deliberately, where an organisation has jvm and distributed-systems staff and wants a document-relational store it fully controls. Of those, keeping an existing fauna-backed application alive on self-hosted infrastructure while a migration is planned and funded and extracting historical data from a fauna dataset that can no longer be reached through the hosted api are not what Microsoft Azure is typically brought in for.
- What can FaunaDB do that Microsoft Azure cannot?
- FaunaDB covers Document-relational model, FQL v10, Distributed ACID transactions, HTTPS access. Microsoft Azure covers Virtual Machines, App Service, SQL Database, Blob Storage.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
FaunaDB: Can I still sign up for Fauna as a service?
No. Fauna Inc. wound down the hosted service in 2025 and the company website is no longer serving. The only way to run Fauna now is to build and operate the open-sourced server yourself.
Microsoft Azure: How much does Microsoft Azure cost?
Azure uses consumption-based pricing where you pay only for resources used and scale as you grow, with no fixed monthly fee. Prices are listed in USD globally, and pricing varies by service, region, and usage patterns.
SourceFaunaDB: What licence is the open-sourced code under?
Apache 2.0, with the copyright held by a FaunaDB Foundation. That is a permissive OSI licence with no competing-use clause, so you may run it, modify it and even offer it as a service.
Microsoft Azure: How can I save money on Azure services?
Azure offers savings up to 65% on select compute services through Azure Savings Plans with one- or three-year commitments. Using Azure Hybrid Benefit with existing Windows Server and SQL Server licenses plus reservations can save up to 85% compared to standard rates.
SourceFaunaDB: Is the open source version the same software that ran the cloud?
It is the core database engine. The control plane, billing, dashboard and multi-tenant operational tooling that made it a service are not part of the release, so you are running the engine, not the product.
Microsoft Azure: Does Azure offer a free tier?
Azure provides free tier services for new users and perpetually free options, including free Spot Virtual Machines, dev/test pricing for development workloads, and access to the Azure Pricing Calculator to estimate monthly costs before deployment.
SourceFaunaDB: What should I migrate to?
There is no drop-in target. Teams that valued the document model with relationships usually land on Postgres with JSONB, and teams that valued the serverless HTTP access pattern usually land on DynamoDB or a managed Postgres with an HTTP driver. Either way the query layer is rewritten.
FaunaDB: How hard is it to self-host?
It builds as a fat JAR and runs as a multi-node JVM cluster. There is an OPERATING.md, but no supported packaging, no operator, no upstream releases and no support contract, so budget for a distributed-systems engineer, not a container.
Related pages
More on Microsoft Azure
Other head to heads
- FaunaDB vs Amazon Aurora
- FaunaDB vs PostgreSQL
- FaunaDB vs Airtable
- FaunaDB vs Cockroach Labs
- FaunaDB vs BigQuery
- FaunaDB vs CouchDB
- FaunaDB vs CosmosDB
- FaunaDB vs ArangoDB
- FaunaDB vs Dgraph
- FaunaDB vs DynamoDB
- FaunaDB vs Google Cloud SQL
- FaunaDB vs Apache Pinot
- FaunaDB vs Amazon RDS
- FaunaDB vs Apache Pulsar
- FaunaDB vs Cassandra
- FaunaDB vs Amazon Redshift
- FaunaDB vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- FaunaDB vs DigitalOcean
- FaunaDB vs Grafana Cloud
- FaunaDB vs Neon
- FaunaDB vs Google Cloud Platform
- FaunaDB vs Hetzner Cloud
- FaunaDB vs Linode
- FaunaDB vs Vultr
- FaunaDB vs Encore
- FaunaDB vs IBM Cloud
- FaunaDB vs Zeabur
- FaunaDB vs Nomad
- FaunaDB vs OpenEBS
- FaunaDB vs OVHcloud
- FaunaDB vs Puppet
- FaunaDB vs Qovery
- FaunaDB vs Scaleway
- FaunaDB vs Skopeo
- Microsoft Azure vs Amazon Aurora
- Microsoft Azure vs PostgreSQL
- Microsoft Azure vs Airtable
- Microsoft Azure vs Cockroach Labs
- Microsoft Azure vs BigQuery
- Microsoft Azure vs CouchDB
- Microsoft Azure vs CosmosDB
- Microsoft Azure vs ArangoDB
- Microsoft Azure vs Dgraph
- Microsoft Azure vs DynamoDB
- Microsoft Azure vs Google Cloud SQL
- Microsoft Azure vs Apache Pinot
- Microsoft Azure vs Amazon RDS
- Microsoft Azure vs Apache Pulsar
- Microsoft Azure vs Cassandra
- Microsoft Azure vs Amazon Redshift
- Microsoft Azure vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Microsoft Azure vs DigitalOcean
- Microsoft Azure vs Grafana Cloud
- Microsoft Azure vs Neon
- Microsoft Azure vs Google Cloud Platform
- Microsoft Azure vs Hetzner Cloud
- Microsoft Azure vs Linode
- Microsoft Azure vs Vultr
- Microsoft Azure vs Encore
- Microsoft Azure vs IBM Cloud
- Microsoft Azure vs Zeabur
- Microsoft Azure vs Nomad
- Microsoft Azure vs OpenEBS
- Microsoft Azure vs OVHcloud
- Microsoft Azure vs Puppet
- Microsoft Azure vs Qovery
- Microsoft Azure vs Scaleway
- Microsoft Azure vs Skopeo

