Software · head to head
CouchDB vs FaunaDB

FaunaDB
Software
The distributed serverless database for modern applications
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: CouchDB append-only storage model may have performance implications for certain workloads with high update rates; FaunaDB the Internet Archive's capture of FaunaDB's homepage on 5 January 2019 confirmed a free 'Try Cloud' tier alongside a self-hosted download, with a separate Pricing page linked but not itself retrievable from the archive within two attempts.
- They diverge on capability: CouchDB covers Multi-master Replication, FaunaDB covers ACID Transactions.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CouchDB and FaunaDB actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CouchDB
- Multi-master Replication
- HTTP/JSON API
- MapReduce Views
- ACID Semantics
- Offline-first
- Conflict Resolution
- Fauxton UI
- PouchDB
Only in FaunaDB
- ACID Transactions
- Document-relational Model
- GraphQL API
- Global Distribution
- Temporal Queries
- Multi-tenancy
- Serverless
- GraphQL
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CouchDB
- Offline-first applications requiring seamless replication across mobile and server environmentsnot FaunaDB
- Multi-master deployments where data consistency eventually resolves across regionsnot FaunaDB
- IoT and edge computing scenarios with intermittent connectivitynot FaunaDB
FaunaDB
- Serverless applicationsnot CouchDB
- Rapid prototypingnot CouchDB
- Mobile backendsnot CouchDB
- JAMstacknot CouchDB
- Microservicesnot CouchDB
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CouchDB
- Append-only storage model may have performance implications for certain workloads with high update rates
- Requires network synchronisation for cluster data consistency; can introduce latency in multi-master scenarios
- No explicit support for complex joins; MapReduce queries may be inefficient compared to relational databases
FaunaDB
- The Internet Archive's capture of FaunaDB's homepage on 5 January 2019 confirmed a free 'Try Cloud' tier alongside a self-hosted download, with a separate Pricing page linked but not itself retrievable from the archive within two attempts.
Pricing, plan by plan
CouchDB
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the CouchDB review.
FaunaDB
Free- FreeFree
- 100K read ops
- 50K write ops
- 1GB storage
- Pro$25/month
- Pay per use
- Priority support
- Advanced features
Which should you pick?
Choose CouchDB if
- You need multi-master replication.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Windows (x64), macOS, Linux (Debian, Ubuntu, RHEL, CentOS), Raspberry Pi.
- You also want http/json api.
Choose FaunaDB if
- You need acid transactions.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want document-relational model.
Questions people ask
- Is CouchDB or FaunaDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. CouchDB starts at Free and FaunaDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CouchDB or FaunaDB?
- CouchDB starts at Free and FaunaDB at Free.
- Does CouchDB or FaunaDB run on more platforms?
- CouchDB runs on Docker, Windows (x64), macOS, Linux (Debian, Ubuntu, RHEL, CentOS), Raspberry Pi. FaunaDB runs on Web.
- Can I use CouchDB for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is CouchDB best used for?
- CouchDB is most often used for offline-first applications requiring seamless replication across mobile and server environments, multi-master deployments where data consistency eventually resolves across regions, iot and edge computing scenarios with intermittent connectivity. Of those, offline-first applications requiring seamless replication across mobile and server environments and multi-master deployments where data consistency eventually resolves across regions are not what FaunaDB is typically brought in for.
- What can CouchDB do that FaunaDB cannot?
- CouchDB covers Multi-master Replication, HTTP/JSON API, MapReduce Views, ACID Semantics. FaunaDB covers ACID Transactions, Document-relational Model, GraphQL API, Global Distribution.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- CouchDB vs Cockroach Labs
- CouchDB vs PostgreSQL
- CouchDB vs Airtable
- CouchDB vs Amazon Aurora
- CouchDB vs Elasticsearch
- CouchDB vs PlanetScale
- CouchDB vs Azure SQL
- CouchDB vs ClickHouse
- CouchDB vs Couchbase
- CouchDB vs DuckDB
- CouchDB vs DynamoDB
- CouchDB vs MariaDB
- CouchDB vs Oracle Database
- CouchDB vs Amazon RDS
- CouchDB vs Amazon Redshift
- CouchDB vs Apache Druid
- CouchDB vs Cassandra
- CouchDB vs Firebolt
- FaunaDB vs Cockroach Labs
- FaunaDB vs PostgreSQL
- FaunaDB vs Airtable
- FaunaDB vs Amazon Aurora
- FaunaDB vs Elasticsearch
- FaunaDB vs PlanetScale
- FaunaDB vs Azure SQL
- FaunaDB vs ClickHouse
- FaunaDB vs Couchbase
- FaunaDB vs DuckDB
- FaunaDB vs DynamoDB
- FaunaDB vs MariaDB
- FaunaDB vs Oracle Database
- FaunaDB vs Amazon RDS
- FaunaDB vs Amazon Redshift
- FaunaDB vs Apache Druid
- FaunaDB vs Cassandra
- FaunaDB vs Firebolt

