Software · head to head
DigitalOcean vs FaunaDB

FaunaDB
Software
The distributed serverless database for modern applications
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: DigitalOcean data transfer overage charged at $0.01 per GiB beyond included allowances; FaunaDB the Internet Archive's capture of FaunaDB's homepage on 5 January 2019 confirmed a free 'Try Cloud' tier alongside a self-hosted download, with a separate Pricing page linked but not itself retrievable from the archive within two attempts.
- They diverge on capability: DigitalOcean covers Droplets (VPS), FaunaDB covers ACID Transactions.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which DigitalOcean and FaunaDB actually diverge.
| Attribute | DigitalOcean | FaunaDB |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | freemium |
| Platforms | Linux, Cloud (AWS, GCP, Azure backend) | Web |
| Founded | 2011 | 2012 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in DigitalOcean
- Droplets (VPS)
- Managed Kubernetes
- App Platform
- Managed Databases
- Spaces (Object Storage)
- Floating IPs
- Load Balancers
- Firewalls
Only in FaunaDB
- ACID Transactions
- Document-relational Model
- GraphQL API
- Global Distribution
- Temporal Queries
- Multi-tenancy
- Serverless
- GraphQL
Both cover
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
DigitalOcean
- Developers seeking affordable VPS starting at $4/month for small applicationsnot FaunaDB
- Teams deploying containerised workloads with Kubernetes starting at $12/month cluster costnot FaunaDB
- Data scientists and ML engineers requiring NVIDIA GPU access at $1.91/GPU/hour (committed)not FaunaDB
FaunaDB
- Serverless applicationsnot DigitalOcean
- Rapid prototypingnot DigitalOcean
- Mobile backendsnot DigitalOcean
- JAMstacknot DigitalOcean
- Microservicesnot DigitalOcean
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
DigitalOcean
- Data transfer overage charged at $0.01 per GiB beyond included allowances
- Free tier includes only 3 static sites; additional static sites require paid upgrade
- Container registry free tier capped at 500 MiB storage; exceeding requires paid tier
- Functions free tier allows 90,000 GiB-seconds monthly; overages billed on usage basis
- GPU Droplets require minimum monthly commitment for lower hourly rates; on-demand significantly more expensive
FaunaDB
- The Internet Archive's capture of FaunaDB's homepage on 5 January 2019 confirmed a free 'Try Cloud' tier alongside a self-hosted download, with a separate Pricing page linked but not itself retrievable from the archive within two attempts.
Pricing, plan by plan
DigitalOcean
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the DigitalOcean review.
FaunaDB
Free- FreeFree
- 100K read ops
- 50K write ops
- 1GB storage
- Pro$25/month
- Pay per use
- Priority support
- Advanced features
Which should you pick?
Choose DigitalOcean if
- You need droplets (vps).
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Cloud (AWS, GCP, Azure backend).
- You also want managed kubernetes.
Choose FaunaDB if
- You need acid transactions.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want document-relational model.
Questions people ask
- Is DigitalOcean or FaunaDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. DigitalOcean starts at Free and FaunaDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, DigitalOcean or FaunaDB?
- DigitalOcean starts at Free and FaunaDB at Free.
- Does DigitalOcean or FaunaDB run on more platforms?
- DigitalOcean runs on Linux, Cloud (AWS, GCP, Azure backend). FaunaDB runs on Web.
- Can I use DigitalOcean for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is DigitalOcean best used for?
- DigitalOcean is most often used for developers seeking affordable vps starting at $4/month for small applications, teams deploying containerised workloads with kubernetes starting at $12/month cluster cost, data scientists and ml engineers requiring nvidia gpu access at $1.91/gpu/hour (committed). Of those, developers seeking affordable vps starting at $4/month for small applications and teams deploying containerised workloads with kubernetes starting at $12/month cluster cost are not what FaunaDB is typically brought in for.
- What can DigitalOcean do that FaunaDB cannot?
- DigitalOcean covers Droplets (VPS), Managed Kubernetes, App Platform, Managed Databases. FaunaDB covers ACID Transactions, Document-relational Model, GraphQL API, Global Distribution. Both handle Web support.
Related pages
More on DigitalOcean
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- DigitalOcean vs Grafana Cloud
- DigitalOcean vs Neon
- DigitalOcean vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- DigitalOcean vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- DigitalOcean vs Deno Deploy
- DigitalOcean vs Heroku
- DigitalOcean vs Hetzner Cloud
- DigitalOcean vs Linode
- DigitalOcean vs Packer
- DigitalOcean vs Pulumi
- DigitalOcean vs Render
- DigitalOcean vs Upstash
- DigitalOcean vs Vagrant
- DigitalOcean vs Vultr
- DigitalOcean vs Akamai
- DigitalOcean vs Alibaba Cloud
- DigitalOcean vs Chef
- DigitalOcean vs Contabo
- DigitalOcean vs Cockroach Labs
- DigitalOcean vs PostgreSQL
- DigitalOcean vs Airtable
- DigitalOcean vs Amazon Aurora
- DigitalOcean vs Elasticsearch
- DigitalOcean vs PlanetScale
- DigitalOcean vs Azure SQL
- DigitalOcean vs ClickHouse
- DigitalOcean vs Couchbase
- DigitalOcean vs DuckDB
- DigitalOcean vs DynamoDB
- DigitalOcean vs MariaDB
- DigitalOcean vs Oracle Database
- DigitalOcean vs Amazon RDS
- DigitalOcean vs Amazon Redshift
- DigitalOcean vs Apache Druid
- DigitalOcean vs Cassandra
- DigitalOcean vs CouchDB
- FaunaDB vs Grafana Cloud
- FaunaDB vs Neon
- FaunaDB vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- FaunaDB vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- FaunaDB vs Deno Deploy
- FaunaDB vs Heroku
- FaunaDB vs Hetzner Cloud
- FaunaDB vs Linode
- FaunaDB vs Packer
- FaunaDB vs Pulumi
- FaunaDB vs Render
- FaunaDB vs Upstash
- FaunaDB vs Vagrant
- FaunaDB vs Vultr
- FaunaDB vs Akamai
- FaunaDB vs Alibaba Cloud
- FaunaDB vs Chef
- FaunaDB vs Contabo
- FaunaDB vs Cockroach Labs
- FaunaDB vs PostgreSQL
- FaunaDB vs Airtable
- FaunaDB vs Amazon Aurora
- FaunaDB vs Elasticsearch
- FaunaDB vs PlanetScale
- FaunaDB vs Azure SQL
- FaunaDB vs ClickHouse
- FaunaDB vs Couchbase
- FaunaDB vs DuckDB
- FaunaDB vs DynamoDB
- FaunaDB vs MariaDB
- FaunaDB vs Oracle Database
- FaunaDB vs Amazon RDS
- FaunaDB vs Amazon Redshift
- FaunaDB vs Apache Druid
- FaunaDB vs Cassandra
- FaunaDB vs CouchDB

