Cloud · head to head
Linode vs Wasabi
The short version
- Only Linode has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Linode linode.com/pricing returns a 301 redirect to akamai.com/cloud/pricing; the service is now sold as Akamai Cloud; Wasabi 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
- They diverge on capability: Linode covers Compute instances, Wasabi covers Hot Cloud Storage.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Linode and Wasabi actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Linode
- Compute instances
- Object storage
- Block storage
- Kubernetes
- Managed database
- Load balancers
- Firewalls
- Private networks
Only in Wasabi
- Hot Cloud Storage
- S3 Compatible API
- Object Lock
- Versioning
- Multi-region
- Data Migration Tools
- Immutability
- Ransomware Protection
Both cover
- Cloud deployment
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Linode
- Running Linux virtual machines on hourly billed shared or dedicated CPU plansnot Wasabi
- Managed Kubernetes, block storage and object storage on a single cloud accountnot Wasabi
- Hosting workloads in a specific one of the listed global regionsnot Wasabi
Wasabi
- Backup and recoverynot Linode
- Media storagenot Linode
- Archive replacementnot Linode
- Ransomware protectionnot Linode
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Linode
- linode.com/pricing returns a 301 redirect to akamai.com/cloud/pricing; the service is now sold as Akamai Cloud
- Charges accrue for any service on the account even when it is powered off, because RAM and network capacity stay reserved; only deleting the service stops billing
- Network transfer beyond the monthly allotment is billed from $0.005 per GB and the rate varies by region
- The Akamai Cloud pricing landing page shows no rates and directs visitors to regional pricing pages or sales
Wasabi
- 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
- Significantly smaller global footprint than AWS with only 16 regions, resulting in higher latency for users in underserved regions
- Performance can degrade with high-volume transactions requiring throughput management strategies
- Hot storage only, no cold/archival storage tier for long-term data at lower cost
- Support responsiveness gaps with teams experiencing multi-day waits for critical issue resolution
Pricing, plan by plan
Linode
Free- Nanode 1GB$5/month
- 1GB RAM
- 1 vCPU
- 25GB SSD
- Linode 4GB$20/month
- 4GB RAM
- 2 vCPU
- 80GB SSD
Wasabi
$7.99/monthNo published plan breakdown. See the Wasabi review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Linode if
- You need compute instances.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api, Cli.
- You also want object storage.
Choose Wasabi if
- You need hot cloud storage.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want s3 compatible api.
Questions people ask
- Is Linode or Wasabi better?
- Neither clearly leads. Linode starts at Free and Wasabi at $7.99/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Linode or Wasabi?
- Linode has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Linode and $7.99/month for Wasabi.
- Does Linode or Wasabi run on more platforms?
- Linode runs on Web, Api, Cli. Wasabi runs on Web, API.
- Can I use Linode for free?
- Yes. Linode has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Wasabi starts at $7.99/month.
- What is Linode best used for?
- Linode is most often used for running linux virtual machines on hourly billed shared or dedicated cpu plans, managed kubernetes, block storage and object storage on a single cloud account, hosting workloads in a specific one of the listed global regions. Of those, running linux virtual machines on hourly billed shared or dedicated cpu plans and managed kubernetes, block storage and object storage on a single cloud account are not what Wasabi is typically brought in for.
- What can Linode do that Wasabi cannot?
- Linode covers Compute instances, Object storage, Block storage, Kubernetes. Wasabi covers Hot Cloud Storage, S3 Compatible API, Object Lock, Versioning. Both handle Cloud deployment, Web support, Api support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Linode: Does Linode charge for data egress?
Linode emphasizes transparent pricing with no egress surprises and a free egress allowance included in the service. The pricing is described as straightforward with no hidden fees and no vendor lock-in.
SourceWasabi: What is Wasabi's pricing structure?
Wasabi offers pay-as-you-go pricing at $7.99 per TB per month as of July 2026, with no egress or API request fees. Reserved capacity plans are available for multi-year terms with volume discounts.
SourceLinode: What is the free trial credit amount?
New and existing enterprise customers can receive up to $5,000 in cloud credits through promotional offers.
SourceWasabi: Does Wasabi charge for data downloads or API calls?
No. Wasabi includes zero egress fees and zero API request fees, which is a major cost advantage over AWS S3. Customers can plan their budget to the penny without worrying about surprise data transfer charges.
SourceLinode: Is there vendor lock-in with Linode's pricing model?
No. Linode explicitly states there is no vendor lock-in as part of their transparent pricing approach.
SourceWasabi: Is there a minimum storage duration requirement?
Yes. Wasabi enforces a 90-day minimum storage term. Users who delete data before 90 days are still charged for the full 90-day period.
SourceWasabi: Is Wasabi S3-compatible?
Yes. Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage is fully S3-compatible, meaning organizations can integrate it into existing workflows without rewriting application code used with AWS S3.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Linode vs DigitalOcean
- Linode vs Contabo
- Linode vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Linode vs Grafana Cloud
- Linode vs Neon
- Linode vs Hetzner Cloud
- Linode vs Vultr
- Linode vs Scaleway
- Linode vs Google Cloud Platform
- Linode vs Encore
- Linode vs Microsoft Azure
- Linode vs OpenEBS
- Linode vs OVHcloud
- Linode vs Puppet
- Linode vs Qovery
- Linode vs Skopeo
- Linode vs Zeabur
- Linode vs Porter
- Linode vs HAProxy
- Linode vs IBM Cloud
- Linode vs kind
- Linode vs Koyeb
- Linode vs Kustomize
- Linode vs Linkerd
- Wasabi vs DigitalOcean
- Wasabi vs Contabo
- Wasabi vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Wasabi vs Grafana Cloud
- Wasabi vs Neon
- Wasabi vs Hetzner Cloud
- Wasabi vs Vultr
- Wasabi vs Scaleway
- Wasabi vs Google Cloud Platform
- Wasabi vs Encore
- Wasabi vs Microsoft Azure
- Wasabi vs OpenEBS
- Wasabi vs OVHcloud
- Wasabi vs Puppet
- Wasabi vs Qovery
- Wasabi vs Skopeo
- Wasabi vs Zeabur
- Wasabi vs Porter
- Wasabi vs HAProxy
- Wasabi vs IBM Cloud
- Wasabi vs kind
- Wasabi vs Koyeb
- Wasabi vs Kustomize
- Wasabi vs Linkerd


