Cloud · head to head
Linode vs Qovery

Qovery
Cloud
Deployment platform that provisions and operates Kubernetes inside your own cloud account
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Linode has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Linode linode.com/pricing returns a 301 redirect to akamai.com/cloud/pricing; the service is now sold as Akamai Cloud; Qovery no plan publishes a price, deployment minute overage rates are not disclosed, and there is a 14 day trial rather than a free tier, so you cannot budget or compare against alternatives without going through sales.
- They diverge on capability: Linode covers Compute instances, Qovery covers Bring your own cloud.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Linode and Qovery actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Linode
- Compute instances
- Object storage
- Block storage
- Kubernetes
- Managed database
- Load balancers
- Firewalls
- Private networks
Only in Qovery
- Bring your own cloud
- Preview environments
- Cluster lifecycle
- Terraform provider
- MCP server
- Policy as code
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Linode
- Running Linux virtual machines on hourly billed shared or dedicated CPU plansnot Qovery
- Managed Kubernetes, block storage and object storage on a single cloud accountnot Qovery
- Hosting workloads in a specific one of the listed global regionsnot Qovery
Qovery
- A regulated business that must keep application data inside its own AWS account but has nobody to build a deployment platformnot Linode
- Giving twenty engineers preview environments per pull request without writing and maintaining Terraform and Helm by handnot Linode
- Standardising deployment across AWS and GCP when acquisitions have left the organisation on two cloudsnot Linode
- Replacing a managed platform when data residency rules put every hosted option out of reachnot Linode
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Linode
- linode.com/pricing returns a 301 redirect to akamai.com/cloud/pricing; the service is now sold as Akamai Cloud
- Charges accrue for any service on the account even when it is powered off, because RAM and network capacity stay reserved; only deleting the service stops billing
- Network transfer beyond the monthly allotment is billed from $0.005 per GB and the rate varies by region
- The Akamai Cloud pricing landing page shows no rates and directs visitors to regional pricing pages or sales
Qovery
- No plan publishes a price, deployment minute overage rates are not disclosed, and there is a 14 day trial rather than a free tier, so you cannot budget or compare against alternatives without going through sales.
- The GPL-3.0 engine and console do not constitute a self-hostable product, because the control plane and API are closed and the self-hosted option is gated behind Enterprise, so the open licence gives you no exit if the company changes direction.
- Qovery provisions managed Kubernetes into your account, which means the cloud bill sits on top of the licence and Qovery initiates control plane and ingress controller upgrades on infrastructure your team is accountable for.
- The company repositioned to agentic infrastructure in June 2026 and now ships a deployment platform, a browser development portal and autonomous coding agents concurrently, so a buyer of the deployment product is not at the centre of the roadmap.
- Team and Business are capped at two and three connected clusters with fixed 4 vCPU CI runners and no single sign-on on Team, which pushes teams of moderate size onto quoted Enterprise pricing earlier than the plan names imply.
Pricing, plan by plan
Linode
Free- Nanode 1GB$5/month
- 1GB RAM
- 1 vCPU
- 25GB SSD
- Linode 4GB$20/month
- 4GB RAM
- 2 vCPU
- 80GB SSD
Qovery
On request- Team$undefined/year
- Billed on usage with no published rate card
- 10 users, up to 100 environments, 2 connected clusters
- 5,000 deployment minutes and 7 day audit logs
- Business$undefined/year
- Billed on usage with no published rate card
- 20 users, up to 250 environments, 3 connected clusters
- 10,000 deployment minutes and 30 day audit logs
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Custom users, environments and clusters
- Self-hosted or air-gapped control plane
- On-premises and bring-your-own-Kubernetes
Which should you pick?
Choose Linode if
- You need compute instances.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api, Cli.
- You also want object storage.
Choose Qovery if
- You need bring your own cloud.
- You work on Web, CLI, REST API, Kubernetes.
- You also want preview environments.
Questions people ask
- Is Linode or Qovery better?
- Neither clearly leads. Linode starts at Free and Qovery at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Linode or Qovery?
- Linode has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Linode and On request for Qovery.
- Does Linode or Qovery run on more platforms?
- Linode runs on Web, Api, Cli. Qovery runs on Web, CLI, REST API, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Linode for free?
- Yes. Linode has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Qovery starts at On request.
- What is Linode best used for?
- Linode is most often used for running linux virtual machines on hourly billed shared or dedicated cpu plans, managed kubernetes, block storage and object storage on a single cloud account, hosting workloads in a specific one of the listed global regions. Of those, running linux virtual machines on hourly billed shared or dedicated cpu plans and managed kubernetes, block storage and object storage on a single cloud account are not what Qovery is typically brought in for.
- What can Linode do that Qovery cannot?
- Linode covers Compute instances, Object storage, Block storage, Kubernetes. Qovery covers Bring your own cloud, Preview environments, Cluster lifecycle, Terraform provider.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Linode: Does Linode charge for data egress?
Linode emphasizes transparent pricing with no egress surprises and a free egress allowance included in the service. The pricing is described as straightforward with no hidden fees and no vendor lock-in.
SourceQovery: Does Qovery run my applications on its own servers?
No. It provisions and operates Kubernetes inside your AWS, GCP, Azure or Scaleway account, so compute and data stay with your cloud provider and that bill is entirely separate from the Qovery licence.
Linode: What is the free trial credit amount?
New and existing enterprise customers can receive up to $5,000 in cloud credits through promotional offers.
SourceQovery: Can I self-host Qovery?
Only on Enterprise. The deployment engine and console are GPL-3.0, but the control plane is closed source and the self-hosted and air-gapped deployments are commercial Enterprise features.
Linode: Is there vendor lock-in with Linode's pricing model?
No. Linode explicitly states there is no vendor lock-in as part of their transparent pricing approach.
SourceQovery: What does it cost?
Qovery does not publish a rate card. Team and Business are billed on usage and quoted through sales, and Enterprise is fully custom. There is a 14 day trial with no card required.
Qovery: What survives if I stop paying?
The Kubernetes cluster and the workloads keep running in your cloud account, but you lose the console, the deployment pipeline, preview environments and every process built on top of them.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Linode vs DigitalOcean
- Linode vs Contabo
- Linode vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Linode vs Grafana Cloud
- Linode vs Neon
- Linode vs Hetzner Cloud
- Linode vs Vultr
- Linode vs Scaleway
- Linode vs Google Cloud Platform
- Linode vs Wasabi
- Linode vs Encore
- Linode vs Microsoft Azure
- Linode vs OpenEBS
- Linode vs OVHcloud
- Linode vs Puppet
- Linode vs Skopeo
- Linode vs Render
- Linode vs Porter
- Linode vs Northflank
- Linode vs CapRover
- Linode vs Coolify
- Linode vs Railway
- Linode vs Dokku
- Linode vs Portworx
- Linode vs Podman
- Linode vs containerd
- Linode vs Oracle Cloud
- Linode vs Orca Security
- Linode vs Packer
- Linode vs OpenTelemetry
- Linode vs Rook
- Qovery vs DigitalOcean
- Qovery vs Contabo
- Qovery vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Qovery vs Grafana Cloud
- Qovery vs Neon
- Qovery vs Hetzner Cloud
- Qovery vs Vultr
- Qovery vs Scaleway
- Qovery vs Google Cloud Platform
- Qovery vs Wasabi
- Qovery vs Encore
- Qovery vs Microsoft Azure
- Qovery vs OpenEBS
- Qovery vs OVHcloud
- Qovery vs Puppet
- Qovery vs Skopeo
- Qovery vs Render
- Qovery vs Porter
- Qovery vs Northflank
- Qovery vs CapRover
- Qovery vs Coolify
- Qovery vs Railway
- Qovery vs Dokku
- Qovery vs Portworx
- Qovery vs Podman
- Qovery vs containerd
- Qovery vs Oracle Cloud
- Qovery vs Orca Security
- Qovery vs Packer
- Qovery vs OpenTelemetry
- Qovery vs Rook

