Spreadsheets · head to head
Equals vs Snowplow

Equals
Spreadsheets
A real spreadsheet with SQL result sets landing in its cells, now sold only on annual contracts starting at 24,000 USD
- From
- $24000/year
- Rated
- -

Snowplow
Business Intelligence
Behavioural data pipeline you run in your own cloud, relicensed away from Apache 2.0 in 2024
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Equals the price list now starts at 24,000 USD a year with no monthly billing and no self-serve signup, having offered a free plan in 2023 and 39 USD per seat in 2024, so any team that evaluated it previously is looking at a different product commercially.; Snowplow the core pipeline was relicensed from Apache 2.0 on 8 January 2024 to the Snowplow Limited Use Licence Agreement and a Confluent-derived community licence, so organisations that adopted it as permissively licensed software must now review their entitlement, buy a licence, or migrate.
- They diverge on capability: Equals covers Connected sheets, Snowplow covers Own-cloud deployment.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Equals and Snowplow actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Equals
- Connected sheets
- Real spreadsheet mechanics
- Cell references into SQL
- Equals Warehouse
- Views
- Writeback
Only in Snowplow
- Own-cloud deployment
- Schema enforcement
- Warehouse loading
- Enrichment
- Trackers
- Streaming output
- Data models
- Snowplow BDP
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Equals
- A revenue operations team that wants software metrics computed in a spreadsheet rather than defined in a BI semantic layernot Snowplow
- Analysts who need a SQL result and manual assumptions in the same file, with the assumptions visible as cellsnot Snowplow
- Joining Stripe, Salesforce and a production database without building a warehouse and pipeline firstnot Snowplow
- Distributing a recurring numbers pack to Slack, email or a wall display without rebuilding it as a dashboardnot Snowplow
Snowplow
- A data team that needs full-fidelity event data in its own warehouse to build attribution or machine learning features rather than to populate dashboardsnot Equals
- A regulated business that cannot send behavioural data to a third-party analytics vendor and must keep collection inside its own cloud accountnot Equals
- A product organisation tired of silently malformed events, which wants a schema contract enforced at collection timenot Equals
- A company modelling customer behaviour across web, mobile and server events that needs them in one consistent structurenot Equals
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Equals
- The price list now starts at 24,000 USD a year with no monthly billing and no self-serve signup, having offered a free plan in 2023 and 39 USD per seat in 2024, so any team that evaluated it previously is looking at a different product commercially.
- Your data is copied out of your infrastructure by design, into a Snowflake warehouse that Equals operates, with Fivetran holding non-SQL source data in transit, and no self-hosted or bring-your-own-warehouse option is documented.
- The financial function category contains only IRR, NPV and PMT, with no XIRR, XNPV, FV, PV, RATE or NPER, and there is no LAMBDA, LET, OFFSET or INDIRECT, so a substantial class of existing spreadsheet models cannot be ported without rework.
- No documentation of importing or exporting Excel files exists anywhere in the docs index; the supported file sources are CSV and Google Sheets and the only documented export is dashboards as PDF, which is a notable gap for a product positioning itself as a successor to Excel.
- Data freshness is a pricing lever rather than a setting, at six hours on Essential, one hour on Business and fifteen minutes on Enterprise, and the feature that removes row limits is itself gated above the entry tier, so the Essential row ceiling is neither published nor unlimited.
Snowplow
- The core pipeline was relicensed from Apache 2.0 on 8 January 2024 to the Snowplow Limited Use Licence Agreement and a Confluent-derived community licence, so organisations that adopted it as permissively licensed software must now review their entitlement, buy a licence, or migrate.
- You run the pipeline in your own cloud, which means the infrastructure bill, the on-call rota and the upgrade work are yours, and at high event volume that operational cost frequently exceeds what a hosted product would have charged.
- Schema enforcement is the main benefit and the main friction, because every new event requires a schema to be authored and versioned, and teams without discipline around that end up blocked on their own governance process.
- There is no analysis layer: Snowplow delivers data to your warehouse and nothing else, so you still need modelling, a BI tool and the people to run them before anyone sees a number.
- The licence change fractured the community, spawning an Apache 2.0 fork, which means community contributions and third-party tooling are now split across two codebases with uncertain long-term maintenance.
Pricing, plan by plan
Equals
$24000/year- Essential$24000/year
- Unlimited viewers and unlimited editors
- 3 connectors
- Data sync every 6 hours
- Business$36000/year
- Unlimited viewers and unlimited editors
- 5 connectors or a warehouse connection
- Data sync every hour
- Enterprise$60000/year
- Unlimited viewers and unlimited editors
- Unlimited connectors or a warehouse connection
- Data sync every 15 minutes
- Connector add-ons$199/month
- 199 USD per month for each additional database or import script connector
- 699 USD per month for each additional connector of any other type
- Available on Business and Enterprise
Snowplow
On request- Snowplow BDP$undefined/year
- Commercial pricing quoted by event volume and deployment
- Core pipeline components under the Snowplow Limited Use Licence Agreement, not Apache 2.0
- Trackers, analytics SDKs and Iglu SDKs remain Apache 2.0
Which should you pick?
Choose Equals if
- You need connected sheets.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want real spreadsheet mechanics.
Choose Snowplow if
- You need own-cloud deployment.
- You work on Linux, Web, Docker.
- You also want schema enforcement.
Questions people ask
- Is Equals or Snowplow better?
- Neither clearly leads. Equals starts at $24000/year and Snowplow at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Equals or Snowplow?
- Equals starts at $24000/year and Snowplow at On request.
- Does Equals or Snowplow run on more platforms?
- Equals runs on Web, API. Snowplow runs on Linux, Web, Docker.
- What is Equals best used for?
- Equals is most often used for a revenue operations team that wants software metrics computed in a spreadsheet rather than defined in a bi semantic layer, analysts who need a sql result and manual assumptions in the same file, with the assumptions visible as cells, joining stripe, salesforce and a production database without building a warehouse and pipeline first, distributing a recurring numbers pack to slack, email or a wall display without rebuilding it as a dashboard. Of those, a revenue operations team that wants software metrics computed in a spreadsheet rather than defined in a bi semantic layer and analysts who need a sql result and manual assumptions in the same file, with the assumptions visible as cells are not what Snowplow is typically brought in for.
- What can Equals do that Snowplow cannot?
- Equals covers Connected sheets, Real spreadsheet mechanics, Cell references into SQL, Equals Warehouse. Snowplow covers Own-cloud deployment, Schema enforcement, Warehouse loading, Enrichment.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Equals: Is it a real spreadsheet or a modelling tool with a grid?
A real spreadsheet. A1 references, absolute reference locking, pivot tables and spilling array formulas all work, and SQL results land in ranges that ordinary cells reference.
Snowplow: Is Snowplow still open source?
Not in the permissive sense. On 8 January 2024 the core pipeline moved from Apache 2.0 to the Snowplow Limited Use Licence Agreement, with version 1.1 following in December 2024, alongside a community licence based on the Confluent Community Licence. Trackers and analytics SDKs remain Apache 2.0.
Equals: What does it actually cost?
24,000 USD a year for Essential, 36,000 for Business and 60,000 for Enterprise, billed annually. There is no monthly option and no self-serve signup; the trial is negotiated per customer.
Snowplow: Can we still run it for free in production?
Free use of the relicensed core components is materially constrained and commercial use generally requires an agreement. Read the current licence text against your intended use rather than relying on older documentation.
Equals: Are seats charged?
No. Viewers and editors are unlimited on every plan. The meters are connector count, refresh frequency and AI spend, with additional connectors at 199 or 699 USD a month.
Snowplow: Is there an Apache 2.0 alternative?
Yes, a fork called OpenSnowcat was created in response to the relicensing and continues under Apache 2.0.
Equals: Does my data stay in my own warehouse?
No. Connecting more than one source syncs data into a Snowflake warehouse that Equals runs, and non-SQL sources pass through Fivetran. There is no documented self-hosted option.
Snowplow: What does Snowplow BDP cost?
Not published. It is quoted by event volume and deployment, and your own cloud infrastructure costs are separate and additional.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Equals vs Looker
- Equals vs Coefficient
- Equals vs Metabase
- Equals vs Redash
- Equals vs Quadratic
- Equals vs Sigma Computing
- Equals vs Tableau
- Equals vs Apache Superset
- Equals vs Teable
- Equals vs Baserow
- Equals vs Numbers
- Equals vs SeaTable
- Equals vs APITable
- Equals vs Cube Software
- Equals vs Mathesar
- Equals vs Rowy
- Equals vs Anaplan
- Equals vs Pigment
- Equals vs DashThis
- Equals vs Hebbia
- Equals vs Logi Analytics
- Equals vs Luzmo
- Equals vs Preset
- Equals vs ProfitWell
- Equals vs Power BI
- Equals vs Sisense
- Equals vs Amazon QuickSight
- Equals vs MicroStrategy
- Equals vs Yellowfin
- Equals vs Zebra BI
- Equals vs Zenlytic
- Equals vs ThoughtSpot
- Equals vs Cube
- Snowplow vs Looker
- Snowplow vs Coefficient
- Snowplow vs Metabase
- Snowplow vs Redash
- Snowplow vs Quadratic
- Snowplow vs Sigma Computing
- Snowplow vs Tableau
- Snowplow vs Apache Superset
- Snowplow vs Teable
- Snowplow vs Baserow
- Snowplow vs Numbers
- Snowplow vs SeaTable
- Snowplow vs APITable
- Snowplow vs Cube Software
- Snowplow vs Mathesar
- Snowplow vs Rowy
- Snowplow vs Anaplan
- Snowplow vs Pigment
- Snowplow vs DashThis
- Snowplow vs Hebbia
- Snowplow vs Logi Analytics
- Snowplow vs Luzmo
- Snowplow vs Preset
- Snowplow vs ProfitWell
- Snowplow vs Power BI
- Snowplow vs Sisense
- Snowplow vs Amazon QuickSight
- Snowplow vs MicroStrategy
- Snowplow vs Yellowfin
- Snowplow vs Zebra BI
- Snowplow vs Zenlytic
- Snowplow vs ThoughtSpot
- Snowplow vs Cube
