Databases · head to head
PlanetScale vs Refact

PlanetScale
Databases
The MySQL-compatible serverless database
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Refact
Developer Tools
Autonomous AI coding agent for development tasks
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- PlanetScale is a MySQL-compatible serverless database platform; Refact is an autonomous AI coding agent.
- Free plans on both; paid from $15/mo and $10/mo.
- Only PlanetScale lists non-blocking Schema Changes; only Refact lists autonomous agent workflows.
- Where PlanetScale falls short: pricing varies significantly across 17+ AWS and GCP regions.
- Where Refact falls short: requires configuration for optimal performance.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which PlanetScale and Refact actually diverge.
| Attribute | PlanetScale | Refact |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Freemium with paid tiers |
| Platforms | Web | VS Code, Web |
| Category | Databases | Developer Tools |
| Founded | 2018 | 2023 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in PlanetScale
- Database Branching
- Non-blocking Schema Changes
- Insights
- Horizontal Scaling
- Connection Pooling
- Query Caching
- Automatic Backups
- Global Replication
Only in Refact
- Autonomous agent workflows
- IDE chat
- Real-time code completions
- GitHub integration
- Database integration
- On-premise deployment
- Multi-LLM support
- 25+ language support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
PlanetScale
- MySQL-compatible applications requiring horizontal scalingnot Refact
- PostgreSQL deployments with custom cluster configurationsnot Refact
- Multi-region database deployments on AWS or GCPnot Refact
- Applications requiring transparent sharding via Vitessnot Refact
Refact
- Autonomous code generation for development tasksnot PlanetScale
- End-to-end bug fixes and refactoringnot PlanetScale
- Multi-language software development accelerationnot PlanetScale
- Enterprise development with data privacy requirementsnot PlanetScale
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
PlanetScale
- Pricing varies significantly across 17+ AWS and GCP regions
- Additional costs for EBS storage beyond base tier, backup storage, and egress
- Dedicated PgBouncer and replicas incur separate charges
- Metal tier pricing increases sharply with larger configurations
Refact
- Requires configuration for optimal performance
- On-premise deployment adds operational complexity
- Free tier limited by daily agent request quota
- Coin system adds complexity to cost calculation
Pricing, plan by plan
PlanetScale
Free- Postgres EBS Single-Node (ARM64 PS-5)$5/mo
- 512 MiB RAM
- Single-node configuration
- EBS storage included
- Postgres EBS HA (ARM64 PS-5)$15/mo
- 512 MiB RAM
- 3-node high-availability setup
- 1 primary + 2 replicas
- Postgres Metal (M-10)$50/mo
- 1/8 vCPU, 1 GiB RAM
- 3-node HA configuration
- 10 GiB NVMe storage included
- Vitess Non-Metal 3-Node$39/mo
- Sharding-capable database
- x86-64 architecture
- 3-node configuration
Refact
Free- FreeFree
- Limited daily agent usage
- Unlimited completions
- 2,000 coins for agent and chat
- Pro$10/mo
- 40 daily agent requests
- 64k context window
- 10,000 coins monthly
- EnterpriseOn request
- On-premise deployment
- Custom coin allocation
- Fine-tuning support
Which should you pick?
Choose PlanetScale if
- You need database branching.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want non-blocking schema changes.
Choose Refact if
- You need autonomous agent workflows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on VS Code, Web.
- You also want ide chat.
Questions people ask
- Is PlanetScale or Refact better?
- Neither clearly leads. PlanetScale starts at Free and Refact at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, PlanetScale or Refact?
- PlanetScale starts at Free and Refact at Free.
- Does PlanetScale or Refact run on more platforms?
- PlanetScale runs on Web. Refact runs on VS Code, Web.
- Can I use PlanetScale for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is PlanetScale best used for?
- PlanetScale is most often used for mysql-compatible applications requiring horizontal scaling, postgresql deployments with custom cluster configurations, multi-region database deployments on aws or gcp, applications requiring transparent sharding via vitess. Of those, mysql-compatible applications requiring horizontal scaling and postgresql deployments with custom cluster configurations are not what Refact is typically brought in for.
- What can PlanetScale do that Refact cannot?
- PlanetScale covers Database Branching, Non-blocking Schema Changes, Insights, Horizontal Scaling. Refact covers Autonomous agent workflows, IDE chat, Real-time code completions, GitHub integration.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
PlanetScale: How much does a PlanetScale Postgres database cost per month?
PlanetScale Postgres pricing starts at $5/month for single-node ARM64 configurations with 512 MiB RAM and $15/month for the same specs in high-availability mode with 1 primary and 2 replicas. Metal tier starts at $50/month for M-10 configuration (1/8 vCPU, 1 GiB RAM). Exact pricing depends on cluster size, node architecture (ARM64 vs x86-64), storage configuration, and selected AWS/GCP region.
SourceRefact: How many programming languages does Refact support?
Refact supports 25+ programming languages including Python, JavaScript, Go, Rust, Java, C++, and many others.
SourcePlanetScale: Is there a free tier for PlanetScale?
PlanetScale offers a free tier for development and testing workloads. After free tier limits are reached, usage-based pricing applies starting at $5/month for the smallest Postgres single-node configuration, with costs scaling based on cluster size, compute, storage, and additional features like dedicated PgBouncer or replicas.
SourceRefact: Can I deploy Refact on-premises?
Yes. Refact offers on-premise deployment options for organizations requiring complete data control and privacy.
SourcePlanetScale: What is the difference between PlanetScale ARM64 and x86-64 pricing?
ARM64 instances cost significantly less than x86-64 equivalents. For example, a Postgres EBS HA cluster with 512 MiB RAM costs $15/month on ARM64 but $39/month on x86-64. This pricing difference extends across all cluster sizes, with larger x86-64 configurations reaching up to $5,599/month compared to ARM64 alternatives.
SourceRefact: What LLMs does Refact support?
Refact works with multiple LLMs including Claude, GPT-4, and open-source models, giving you flexibility in model selection.
SourcePlanetScale: What is included in a PlanetScale cluster price versus additional costs?
The advertised cluster price covers the base compute and configured storage. Additional charges apply for EBS storage beyond the base allocation, backup storage, data egress, optional dedicated PgBouncer connections, and replicas beyond the base high-availability configuration. Regional pricing varies across 17+ AWS and GCP zones.
SourceRelated pages
More on PlanetScale
Other head to heads
- PlanetScale vs Amazon Aurora
- PlanetScale vs Nile
- PlanetScale vs Cockroach Labs
- PlanetScale vs PostgreSQL
- PlanetScale vs BigQuery
- PlanetScale vs MotherDuck
- PlanetScale vs FaunaDB
- PlanetScale vs DataGrip
- PlanetScale vs TiDB
- PlanetScale vs Readyset
- PlanetScale vs Xata
- PlanetScale vs Chroma
- PlanetScale vs Cloudinary
- PlanetScale vs Convex
- PlanetScale vs Dgraph
- PlanetScale vs Dragonfly
- PlanetScale vs Dremio
- PlanetScale vs DynamoDB
- PlanetScale vs GitHub Copilot
- PlanetScale vs Swagger UI
- PlanetScale vs Sweep
- PlanetScale vs GitHub
- PlanetScale vs Coder
- PlanetScale vs Deep Code
- PlanetScale vs Pieces for Developers
- PlanetScale vs CodeSandbox
- PlanetScale vs GNU Emacs
- PlanetScale vs Moonrepo
- PlanetScale vs Pants Build
- PlanetScale vs Atlantis
- PlanetScale vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- PlanetScale vs GNAT Pro
- PlanetScale vs Keycloak
- PlanetScale vs Penpot
- PlanetScale vs PyCharm
- PlanetScale vs Sublime Text
- Refact vs Amazon Aurora
- Refact vs Nile
- Refact vs Cockroach Labs
- Refact vs PostgreSQL
- Refact vs BigQuery
- Refact vs MotherDuck
- Refact vs FaunaDB
- Refact vs DataGrip
- Refact vs TiDB
- Refact vs Readyset
- Refact vs Xata
- Refact vs Chroma
- Refact vs Cloudinary
- Refact vs Convex
- Refact vs Dgraph
- Refact vs Dragonfly
- Refact vs Dremio
- Refact vs DynamoDB
- Refact vs GitHub Copilot
- Refact vs Swagger UI
- Refact vs Sweep
- Refact vs GitHub
- Refact vs Coder
- Refact vs Deep Code
- Refact vs Pieces for Developers
- Refact vs CodeSandbox
- Refact vs GNU Emacs
- Refact vs Moonrepo
- Refact vs Pants Build
- Refact vs Atlantis
- Refact vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Refact vs GNAT Pro
- Refact vs Keycloak
- Refact vs Penpot
- Refact vs PyCharm
- Refact vs Sublime Text
