Developer Tools · head to head
Octopus Deploy vs Tilt

Octopus Deploy
Developer Tools
Continuous delivery and runbook automation for releases
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Tilt
Developer Tools
Local Kubernetes development loop that rebuilds and live-updates containers on save
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Octopus Deploy free tier caps at 10 projects, 10 tenants, 10 machines, 10 users, 5 concurrent tasks and 1 space; Tilt docker acquired Tilt in 2022 and the team now splits its time across Compose and Docker Desktop, so feature velocity is modest and the product's long-term priority inside Docker is not guaranteed; treat it as a stable utility, not a growing platform.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Octopus Deploy and Tilt actually diverge.
| Attribute | Octopus Deploy | Tilt |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | subscription | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | Web | Linux, macOS, Windows |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Developer Tools).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Octopus Deploy
Nothing recorded that Tilt does not also cover.
Only in Tilt
- Live update
- Tiltfile as code
- Unified web UI
- Selective rebuilds
- Local and remote clusters
- Resource dependencies
- Extensions registry
- Custom buttons and triggers
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Octopus Deploy
- Automating software deployments across development, testing, productionnot Tilt
- Automating emergency tasks like website failover and incident responsenot Tilt
- Managing multi-tenant deployments without duplicating configurationnot Tilt
- Tracking DORA metrics and enforcing deployment approval gatesnot Tilt
Tilt
- A team of ten or more engineers whose application is fifteen microservices on Kubernetes and who currently wait on CI to test a changenot Octopus Deploy
- An organisation onboarding new developers who want a single command that stands up the whole stack from a committed Tiltfilenot Octopus Deploy
- A platform team giving product engineers a consistent local environment against a shared remote development clusternot Octopus Deploy
- A codebase where one repository contains several services and rebuilding all of them on every edit is the main source of lost timenot Octopus Deploy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Octopus Deploy
- Free tier caps at 10 projects, 10 tenants, 10 machines, 10 users, 5 concurrent tasks and 1 space
- Annual billing is the only option for both Octopus Cloud and Octopus Server; there is no monthly plan
- Professional cloud tier is $4,330 per year and Enterprise cloud is $24,600 per year, with tenants and machines sold as add-ons beyond the free allotment
Tilt
- Docker acquired Tilt in 2022 and the team now splits its time across Compose and Docker Desktop, so feature velocity is modest and the product's long-term priority inside Docker is not guaranteed; treat it as a stable utility, not a growing platform.
- The Tiltfile is Starlark, a Python dialect, so non-trivial setups become real programs that need reviewing and maintaining, and the person who wrote yours becomes a single point of failure.
- Live update only works when the running container can accept synced files and restart the process; compiled languages, distroless images and read-only filesystems often force you back to a full image rebuild, which removes the main benefit.
- It assumes Kubernetes. If your development target is plain Docker Compose or serverless functions, Tilt adds a cluster you did not need and a layer of abstraction with no payoff.
- There is no commercial support contract, no SLA and no paid tier, so when a Kubernetes version upgrade breaks something you are dependent on GitHub issues and a Slack channel rather than a vendor you can escalate to.
Pricing, plan by plan
Octopus Deploy
Free- FreeFree
- 10 projects
- 10 tenants
- 10 machines
- Professional (Cloud)$4330/year
- Up to 100 projects
- Unlimited spaces and users
- Tenants and machines available as add-ons
- Professional (Server)$2080/year
- Up to 100 projects
- Unlimited spaces and users
- Tenants and machines available as add-ons
- Enterprise (Cloud)$24600/year
- 100+ projects supported
- Unlimited spaces and users
- 20 concurrent tasks
Tilt
Free- TiltFree
- Apache 2.0 licensed
- All features, no paid tier
- Community support via the Kubernetes Slack #tilt channel
Which should you pick?
Choose Tilt if
- You need live update.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- You also want tiltfile as code.
Questions people ask
- Is Octopus Deploy or Tilt better?
- Neither clearly leads. Octopus Deploy starts at Free and Tilt at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Octopus Deploy or Tilt?
- Octopus Deploy starts at Free and Tilt at Free.
- Does Octopus Deploy or Tilt run on more platforms?
- Octopus Deploy runs on Web. Tilt runs on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- Can I use Octopus Deploy for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Octopus Deploy best used for?
- Octopus Deploy is most often used for automating software deployments across development, testing, production, automating emergency tasks like website failover and incident response, managing multi-tenant deployments without duplicating configuration, tracking dora metrics and enforcing deployment approval gates. Of those, automating software deployments across development, testing, production and automating emergency tasks like website failover and incident response are not what Tilt is typically brought in for.
- What can Octopus Deploy do that Tilt cannot?
- Tilt covers Live update, Tiltfile as code, Unified web UI, Selective rebuilds.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Octopus Deploy: How much does Octopus Deploy cost?
Octopus Deploy offers a free tier at $0/year with limits on projects (10), users (10), and tenants (10). Professional plans start at $2,080/year for self-hosted or $4,330/year for cloud hosting.
SourceTilt: Is Tilt free?
Yes, entirely. It is Apache 2.0 open source with no paid tier and no licence fee.
Octopus Deploy: What does the free Octopus Deploy tier include?
The free tier includes 10 projects, 10 tenants, 10 machines, 10 users, 5 concurrent tasks, 1TB file storage, 100GB database storage, and community support only.
SourceTilt: Who owns Tilt now?
Docker, which acquired it in May 2022. It remains open source and the repository is still actively maintained.
Octopus Deploy: Can I try Octopus Deploy for free before purchasing?
Yes, a free tier is available with unlimited duration but capped usage, plus a 30-day free trial with full Enterprise features is offered to evaluate the platform.
SourceTilt: Do I need a remote cluster?
No. It works against a local cluster such as kind, minikube or Docker Desktop, and also against a shared remote development cluster if your services are too heavy to run locally.
Octopus Deploy: What are the Enterprise pricing differences between Cloud and Server hosting?
Enterprise Cloud hosting costs $24,600/year and includes 20 concurrent tasks and 24/7 support. Enterprise Server self-hosted costs $15,600/year with flexible concurrent task configuration and 24/7 support.
SourceTilt: How is it different from Skaffold?
Both automate the build-deploy loop. Tilt puts more weight on the live-update path and a multi-service dashboard; Skaffold is more configuration-driven and closer to Google's tooling.
Related pages
More on Octopus Deploy
Other head to heads
- Octopus Deploy vs Visual Studio Code
- Octopus Deploy vs ESLint
- Octopus Deploy vs pnpm
- Octopus Deploy vs Turborepo
- Octopus Deploy vs Harness
- Octopus Deploy vs HCP Terraform
- Octopus Deploy vs Earthly
- Octopus Deploy vs Moonrepo
- Octopus Deploy vs Ansible
- Octopus Deploy vs Argo CD
- Octopus Deploy vs Garden
- Octopus Deploy vs GitLab CI/CD
- Octopus Deploy vs Namespace
- Octopus Deploy vs Nix
- Octopus Deploy vs Nixpacks
- Octopus Deploy vs Okteto
- Octopus Deploy vs OpsLevel
- Octopus Deploy vs PartyKit
- Octopus Deploy vs Dagger
- Octopus Deploy vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Octopus Deploy vs Bazel
- Octopus Deploy vs Atlantis
- Octopus Deploy vs Backstage
- Octopus Deploy vs Pants Build
- Octopus Deploy vs Jitsu
- Octopus Deploy vs Frappe
- Octopus Deploy vs PhpStorm
- Octopus Deploy vs Pieces for Developers
- Octopus Deploy vs RAD Studio
- Octopus Deploy vs Refact
- Tilt vs Visual Studio Code
- Tilt vs ESLint
- Tilt vs pnpm
- Tilt vs Turborepo
- Tilt vs Harness
- Tilt vs HCP Terraform
- Tilt vs Earthly
- Tilt vs Moonrepo
- Tilt vs Ansible
- Tilt vs Argo CD
- Tilt vs Garden
- Tilt vs GitLab CI/CD
- Tilt vs Namespace
- Tilt vs Nix
- Tilt vs Nixpacks
- Tilt vs Okteto
- Tilt vs OpsLevel
- Tilt vs PartyKit
- Tilt vs Dagger
- Tilt vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Tilt vs Bazel
- Tilt vs Atlantis
- Tilt vs Backstage
- Tilt vs Pants Build
- Tilt vs Jitsu
- Tilt vs Frappe
- Tilt vs PhpStorm
- Tilt vs Pieces for Developers
- Tilt vs RAD Studio
- Tilt vs Refact
