Government · head to head
eCode360 vs Silent Eight

Silent Eight
Cybersecurity
AI adjudication of sanctions screening and AML alerts
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: eCode360 eCode360's own vendor site now redirects to ICC Code Solutions, stating eCode360 is now part of ICC Innovation, indicating General Code has been absorbed into ICC rather than operating as an independent vendor; Silent Eight automated disposition has to clear model risk governance and a regulator, and the shadow running period before auto-close is permitted can consume most of the first year of the contract.
- They diverge on capability: eCode360 covers Online Code Publishing, Silent Eight covers Alert adjudication.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which eCode360 and Silent Eight actually diverge.
| Attribute | eCode360 | Silent Eight |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $175/month | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Platforms | Web, Ios, Android | Web, Linux |
| Category | Government | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | 1960 | Unknown |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in eCode360
- Online Code Publishing
- Zoning Map Integration
- Advanced Search
- Code Comparison
- Mobile Responsive
- ArcGIS
- Zoning Software
- Document Systems
Only in Silent Eight
- Alert adjudication
- Narrative generation
- Name screening automation
- Quality assurance
- Shadow mode
- Model transparency reporting
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
eCode360
- Citizen Servicesnot Silent Eight
- Records Managementnot Silent Eight
- Public Safetynot Silent Eight
- Civic Engagementnot Silent Eight
Silent Eight
- A bank whose level one screening team spends most of its time closing obvious false name matchesnot eCode360
- A payments institution with alert volumes growing faster than it can recruit and train analystsnot eCode360
- A compliance function asked by a regulator to demonstrate consistency of alert decisions across offshore teamsnot eCode360
- An institution that has just tightened screening thresholds after an enforcement action and cannot staff the resulting alert increasenot eCode360
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
eCode360
- eCode360's own vendor site now redirects to ICC Code Solutions, stating eCode360 is now part of ICC Innovation, indicating General Code has been absorbed into ICC rather than operating as an independent vendor
- ICC Code Solutions' own eCode360 page lists a Professional Subscription at $195 per year in USD for read access to the eCode library, separate from the municipal codification subscriptions sold to local governments
Silent Eight
- Automated disposition has to clear model risk governance and a regulator, and the shadow running period before auto-close is permitted can consume most of the first year of the contract.
- It does not improve detection, so an institution with a poorly tuned monitoring system automates the handling of bad alerts rather than fixing why they exist.
- Pricing is tied to alert volume, which means efficiency gains elsewhere that reduce alerts also reduce the vendor bill in a way sales teams structure minimums against.
- The headcount saving is only realised if the institution actually reduces the analyst pool, and many banks redeploy rather than cut, leaving the business case unrealised on paper.
- As a mid-sized private vendor serving tier one banks, concentration risk cuts both ways; the loss of one large client materially affects the company, and buyers should ask about financial stability during diligence.
Pricing, plan by plan
eCode360
$175/month- eCode360$175/month
- Online Codes
- Zoning Integration
- Mobile Access
Silent Eight
On request- Iris$undefined/year
- Priced by alert volume adjudicated
- Deploys against existing screening and monitoring systems
- Shadow mode evaluation period
Which should you pick?
Choose eCode360 if
- You need online code publishing.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android.
- You also want zoning map integration.
Choose Silent Eight if
- You need alert adjudication.
- You work on Web, Linux.
- You also want narrative generation.
Questions people ask
- Is eCode360 or Silent Eight better?
- Neither clearly leads. eCode360 starts at $175/month and Silent Eight at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, eCode360 or Silent Eight?
- eCode360 starts at $175/month and Silent Eight at On request.
- Does eCode360 or Silent Eight run on more platforms?
- eCode360 runs on Web, Ios, Android. Silent Eight runs on Web, Linux.
- What is eCode360 best used for?
- eCode360 is most often used for citizen services, records management, public safety, civic engagement. Of those, citizen services and records management are not what Silent Eight is typically brought in for.
- What can eCode360 do that Silent Eight cannot?
- eCode360 covers Online Code Publishing, Zoning Map Integration, Advanced Search, Code Comparison. Silent Eight covers Alert adjudication, Narrative generation, Name screening automation, Quality assurance.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Silent Eight: Does Silent Eight replace our screening system?
No. It consumes alerts from your existing screening and monitoring systems and decides them. The detection layer stays where it is.
Silent Eight: Will a regulator accept AI closing alerts?
It depends on your jurisdiction and your model governance evidence. Banks typically run extended shadow mode first and phase auto-closure by alert type.
Silent Eight: Where is the company based?
Singapore, with offices in New York, London and Warsaw.
Related pages
More on Silent Eight
Other head to heads
- eCode360 vs Municode
- eCode360 vs Accela
- eCode360 vs CivicPlus
- eCode360 vs Granicus
- eCode360 vs DocuWare
- eCode360 vs American Legal Publishing
- eCode360 vs GovPilot
- eCode360 vs OpenCities
- eCode360 vs Bidnet Direct
- eCode360 vs Polco
- eCode360 vs Socrata
- eCode360 vs CKAN
- eCode360 vs Clariti
- eCode360 vs DataSF
- eCode360 vs Google Cloud for Government
- eCode360 vs Legistar
- eCode360 vs GovQA
- eCode360 vs NICE Actimize
- eCode360 vs Quantexa
- eCode360 vs ThetaRay
- eCode360 vs Feedzai
- eCode360 vs Jumio
- eCode360 vs Sumsub
- eCode360 vs iDenfy
- eCode360 vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- eCode360 vs Sardine
- eCode360 vs Camio
- eCode360 vs Unit21
- eCode360 vs Shufti Pro
- eCode360 vs NordPass
- eCode360 vs One Identity
- eCode360 vs Ory Kratos
- eCode360 vs OWASP ZAP
- eCode360 vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- eCode360 vs Passbolt
- Silent Eight vs Municode
- Silent Eight vs Accela
- Silent Eight vs CivicPlus
- Silent Eight vs Granicus
- Silent Eight vs DocuWare
- Silent Eight vs American Legal Publishing
- Silent Eight vs GovPilot
- Silent Eight vs OpenCities
- Silent Eight vs Bidnet Direct
- Silent Eight vs Polco
- Silent Eight vs Socrata
- Silent Eight vs CKAN
- Silent Eight vs Clariti
- Silent Eight vs DataSF
- Silent Eight vs Google Cloud for Government
- Silent Eight vs Legistar
- Silent Eight vs GovQA
- Silent Eight vs NICE Actimize
- Silent Eight vs Quantexa
- Silent Eight vs ThetaRay
- Silent Eight vs Feedzai
- Silent Eight vs Jumio
- Silent Eight vs Sumsub
- Silent Eight vs iDenfy
- Silent Eight vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Silent Eight vs Sardine
- Silent Eight vs Camio
- Silent Eight vs Unit21
- Silent Eight vs Shufti Pro
- Silent Eight vs NordPass
- Silent Eight vs One Identity
- Silent Eight vs Ory Kratos
- Silent Eight vs OWASP ZAP
- Silent Eight vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Silent Eight vs Passbolt

