Cybersecurity · head to head
Silent Eight vs Socrata

Silent Eight
Cybersecurity
AI adjudication of sanctions screening and AML alerts
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- They diverge on capability: Silent Eight covers Alert adjudication, Socrata covers Data Publishing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Silent Eight and Socrata actually diverge.
| Attribute | Silent Eight | Socrata |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $500/month |
| Pricing model | quote | subscription |
| Platforms | Web, Linux | Web |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Government |
| Founded | Unknown | 1966 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Silent Eight
- Alert adjudication
- Narrative generation
- Name screening automation
- Quality assurance
- Shadow mode
- Model transparency reporting
Only in Socrata
- Data Publishing
- Visualization Tools
- API Access
- Data Catalog
- Performance Analytics
- Tableau
- Power BI
- ArcGIS
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Silent Eight
- A bank whose level one screening team spends most of its time closing obvious false name matchesnot Socrata
- A payments institution with alert volumes growing faster than it can recruit and train analystsnot Socrata
- A compliance function asked by a regulator to demonstrate consistency of alert decisions across offshore teamsnot Socrata
- An institution that has just tightened screening thresholds after an enforcement action and cannot staff the resulting alert increasenot Socrata
Socrata
- Citizen Servicesnot Silent Eight
- Records Managementnot Silent Eight
- Public Safetynot Silent Eight
- Civic Engagementnot Silent Eight
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Silent Eight
- Automated disposition has to clear model risk governance and a regulator, and the shadow running period before auto-close is permitted can consume most of the first year of the contract.
- It does not improve detection, so an institution with a poorly tuned monitoring system automates the handling of bad alerts rather than fixing why they exist.
- Pricing is tied to alert volume, which means efficiency gains elsewhere that reduce alerts also reduce the vendor bill in a way sales teams structure minimums against.
- The headcount saving is only realised if the institution actually reduces the analyst pool, and many banks redeploy rather than cut, leaving the business case unrealised on paper.
- As a mid-sized private vendor serving tier one banks, concentration risk cuts both ways; the loss of one large client materially affects the company, and buyers should ask about financial stability during diligence.
Socrata
Nothing recorded yet. See the Socrata review.
Pricing, plan by plan
Silent Eight
On request- Iris$undefined/year
- Priced by alert volume adjudicated
- Deploys against existing screening and monitoring systems
- Shadow mode evaluation period
Socrata
$500/month- Open Data$500/month
- Data Portal
- Visualizations
- API Access
Which should you pick?
Choose Silent Eight if
- You need alert adjudication.
- You work on Web, Linux.
- You also want narrative generation.
Questions people ask
- Is Silent Eight or Socrata better?
- Neither clearly leads. Silent Eight starts at On request and Socrata at $500/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Silent Eight or Socrata?
- Silent Eight starts at On request and Socrata at $500/month.
- Does Silent Eight or Socrata run on more platforms?
- Silent Eight runs on Web, Linux. Socrata runs on Web.
- What is Silent Eight best used for?
- Silent Eight is most often used for a bank whose level one screening team spends most of its time closing obvious false name matches, a payments institution with alert volumes growing faster than it can recruit and train analysts, a compliance function asked by a regulator to demonstrate consistency of alert decisions across offshore teams, an institution that has just tightened screening thresholds after an enforcement action and cannot staff the resulting alert increase. Of those, a bank whose level one screening team spends most of its time closing obvious false name matches and a payments institution with alert volumes growing faster than it can recruit and train analysts are not what Socrata is typically brought in for.
- What can Silent Eight do that Socrata cannot?
- Silent Eight covers Alert adjudication, Narrative generation, Name screening automation, Quality assurance. Socrata covers Data Publishing, Visualization Tools, API Access, Data Catalog.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Silent Eight: Does Silent Eight replace our screening system?
No. It consumes alerts from your existing screening and monitoring systems and decides them. The detection layer stays where it is.
Silent Eight: Will a regulator accept AI closing alerts?
It depends on your jurisdiction and your model governance evidence. Banks typically run extended shadow mode first and phase auto-closure by alert type.
Silent Eight: Where is the company based?
Singapore, with offices in New York, London and Warsaw.
Related pages
More on Silent Eight
Other head to heads
- Silent Eight vs NICE Actimize
- Silent Eight vs Quantexa
- Silent Eight vs ThetaRay
- Silent Eight vs Feedzai
- Silent Eight vs Jumio
- Silent Eight vs Sumsub
- Silent Eight vs iDenfy
- Silent Eight vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Silent Eight vs Sardine
- Silent Eight vs Camio
- Silent Eight vs Unit21
- Silent Eight vs Shufti Pro
- Silent Eight vs NordPass
- Silent Eight vs One Identity
- Silent Eight vs Ory Kratos
- Silent Eight vs OWASP ZAP
- Silent Eight vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Silent Eight vs Passbolt
- Silent Eight vs OpenGov
- Silent Eight vs mySidewalk
- Silent Eight vs Granicus
- Silent Eight vs DocuWare
- Silent Eight vs Accela
- Silent Eight vs CivicPlus
- Silent Eight vs CKAN
- Silent Eight vs DataSF
- Silent Eight vs ClearGov
- Silent Eight vs NextRequest
- Silent Eight vs iCompass
- Silent Eight vs Polco
- Silent Eight vs PublicInput
- Silent Eight vs RecDesk
- Silent Eight vs Axon Records
- Silent Eight vs CitizenLab
- Silent Eight vs Legistar
- Socrata vs NICE Actimize
- Socrata vs Quantexa
- Socrata vs ThetaRay
- Socrata vs Feedzai
- Socrata vs Jumio
- Socrata vs Sumsub
- Socrata vs iDenfy
- Socrata vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Socrata vs Sardine
- Socrata vs Camio
- Socrata vs Unit21
- Socrata vs Shufti Pro
- Socrata vs NordPass
- Socrata vs One Identity
- Socrata vs Ory Kratos
- Socrata vs OWASP ZAP
- Socrata vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Socrata vs Passbolt
- Socrata vs OpenGov
- Socrata vs mySidewalk
- Socrata vs Granicus
- Socrata vs DocuWare
- Socrata vs Accela
- Socrata vs CivicPlus
- Socrata vs CKAN
- Socrata vs DataSF
- Socrata vs ClearGov
- Socrata vs NextRequest
- Socrata vs iCompass
- Socrata vs Polco
- Socrata vs PublicInput
- Socrata vs RecDesk
- Socrata vs Axon Records
- Socrata vs CitizenLab
- Socrata vs Legistar

