File Storage · head to head
Duplicati vs Zipkin
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Duplicati no managed service or commercial support; Zipkin less active development and smaller community momentum than Jaeger
- They diverge on capability: Duplicati covers AES-256 encryption, Zipkin covers Trace collection and search.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Duplicati and Zipkin actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Duplicati
- AES-256 encryption
- Incremental backup
- Deduplication
- Multiple cloud backends
- Compression
- Web interface
- AWS S3
- Azure
Only in Zipkin
- Trace collection and search
- Dependency diagram
- Simple deployment
- Pluggable storage
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Duplicati
- Data protectionnot Zipkin
- Disaster recoverynot Zipkin
- Business continuitynot Zipkin
- Ransomware protectionnot Zipkin
- Compliancenot Zipkin
Zipkin
- Adding distributed tracing quickly without standing up heavy infrastructurenot Duplicati
- Java and Spring Boot estates, where instrumentation support is long-establishednot Duplicati
- Small deployments where Jaeger is more than the problem requiresnot Duplicati
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Duplicati
- No managed service or commercial support
- Relies on community support
- No enterprise features
Zipkin
- Less active development and smaller community momentum than Jaeger
- Fewer features: sampling, storage options and UI are all more limited
- The interface is dated and slower to work with on large trace volumes
- Tracing alone still leaves metrics and logs in separate tools during an incident
Pricing, plan by plan
Duplicati
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Duplicati review.
Zipkin
Free- ZipkinFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Duplicati if
- You need aes-256 encryption.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want incremental backup.
Choose Zipkin if
- You need trace collection and search.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- You also want dependency diagram.
Questions people ask
- Is Duplicati or Zipkin better?
- Neither clearly leads. Duplicati starts at Free and Zipkin at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Duplicati or Zipkin?
- Duplicati starts at Free and Zipkin at Free.
- Does Duplicati or Zipkin run on more platforms?
- Duplicati runs on Windows, macOS, Linux. Zipkin runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Duplicati for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Duplicati best used for?
- Duplicati is most often used for data protection, disaster recovery, business continuity, ransomware protection. Of those, data protection and disaster recovery are not what Zipkin is typically brought in for.
- What can Duplicati do that Zipkin cannot?
- Duplicati covers AES-256 encryption, Incremental backup, Deduplication, Multiple cloud backends. Zipkin covers Trace collection and search, Dependency diagram, Simple deployment, Pluggable storage.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Duplicati: Is Duplicati free?
Yes. Duplicati is completely free and open-source under the LGPL license. There are no premium tiers, trials, or limitations.
SourceZipkin: Is Zipkin free?
Yes, open source with no licence fee.
Duplicati: What does Duplicati support?
Duplicati supports zero-trust, fully encrypted backups to local storage, network drives, and cloud services. It includes deduplication and incremental backups.
SourceZipkin: Zipkin or Jaeger?
Jaeger has more momentum, more features and CNCF backing. Zipkin is lighter and quicker to stand up, and remains well supported in the Java and Spring ecosystem.
Duplicati: What are the platforms?
Duplicati runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux. It can back up data to local storage, network drives, or cloud providers.
SourceZipkin: Does Zipkin work with OpenTelemetry?
Yes. OpenTelemetry can export to Zipkin, which is now the usual way to instrument for it.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Duplicati vs Arq Backup
- Duplicati vs Carbonite
- Duplicati vs Ceph
- Duplicati vs TrueNAS
- Duplicati vs Nextcloud
- Duplicati vs pCloud
- Duplicati vs Sync.com
- Duplicati vs Tresorit
- Duplicati vs Backblaze
- Duplicati vs Cloudian
- Duplicati vs LucidLink
- Duplicati vs Storj
- Duplicati vs Microsoft OneDrive
- Duplicati vs Zerto
- Duplicati vs IDrive e2
- Duplicati vs Panzura
- Duplicati vs Jaeger
- Duplicati vs Grafana Cloud
- Duplicati vs VictoriaMetrics
- Duplicati vs Deno Deploy
- Duplicati vs Anyscale
- Duplicati vs Cerebrium
- Duplicati vs Go
- Duplicati vs Orca Security
- Duplicati vs Heroku
- Duplicati vs Vault
- Duplicati vs Beam Cloud
- Duplicati vs Caddy
- Duplicati vs DeepInfra
- Duplicati vs OpenTelemetry
- Duplicati vs Thanos
- Duplicati vs Linkerd
- Duplicati vs Longhorn
- Zipkin vs Arq Backup
- Zipkin vs Carbonite
- Zipkin vs Ceph
- Zipkin vs TrueNAS
- Zipkin vs Nextcloud
- Zipkin vs pCloud
- Zipkin vs Sync.com
- Zipkin vs Tresorit
- Zipkin vs Backblaze
- Zipkin vs Cloudian
- Zipkin vs LucidLink
- Zipkin vs Storj
- Zipkin vs Microsoft OneDrive
- Zipkin vs Zerto
- Zipkin vs IDrive e2
- Zipkin vs Panzura
- Zipkin vs Jaeger
- Zipkin vs Grafana Cloud
- Zipkin vs VictoriaMetrics
- Zipkin vs Deno Deploy
- Zipkin vs Anyscale
- Zipkin vs Cerebrium
- Zipkin vs Go
- Zipkin vs Orca Security
- Zipkin vs Heroku
- Zipkin vs Vault
- Zipkin vs Beam Cloud
- Zipkin vs Caddy
- Zipkin vs DeepInfra
- Zipkin vs OpenTelemetry
- Zipkin vs Thanos
- Zipkin vs Linkerd
- Zipkin vs Longhorn


