File Storage · head to head
Duplicati vs LucidLink

LucidLink
File Storage
Cloud filesystem that streams large media files on demand instead of syncing them
- From
- $7/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Duplicati has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Duplicati no managed service or commercial support; LucidLink additional storage at $7 to $8 per 100GB per month is roughly three to four times raw S3 pricing, so teams with large cold archives pay a heavy premium for data they rarely touch.
- They diverge on capability: Duplicati covers AES-256 encryption, LucidLink covers Filespaces.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Duplicati and LucidLink actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (File Storage).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Duplicati
- AES-256 encryption
- Incremental backup
- Deduplication
- Multiple cloud backends
- Compression
- Web interface
- AWS S3
- Azure
Only in LucidLink
- Filespaces
- On-demand streaming
- Client-side encryption
- Customer-managed keys
- Bring your own storage
- Snapshots
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Duplicati
- Data protectionnot LucidLink
- Disaster recoverynot LucidLink
- Business continuitynot LucidLink
- Ransomware protectionnot LucidLink
- Compliancenot LucidLink
LucidLink
- A post house with editors in three countries cutting from one shared 4K rush library without shipping drivesnot Duplicati
- A broadcaster giving freelancers access to a project for a fortnight without provisioning VPN and a NAS mountnot Duplicati
- A game studio sharing multi-gigabyte asset builds where syncing every file to every workstation is impracticalnot Duplicati
- An architecture practice opening large point cloud and BIM files from a laptop on a hotel connectionnot Duplicati
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Duplicati
- No managed service or commercial support
- Relies on community support
- No enterprise features
LucidLink
- Additional storage at $7 to $8 per 100GB per month is roughly three to four times raw S3 pricing, so teams with large cold archives pay a heavy premium for data they rarely touch.
- Included storage is pooled per member, so adding a seat is also how you buy capacity, and teams with a few heavy users and many light ones buy seats purely for the gigabytes.
- Performance is bounded by the network link and local cache size, so a workstation with a small cache on a poor connection performs far worse than the demonstrations suggest.
- Small-file and metadata-heavy workloads such as code repositories, node modules trees or build outputs perform badly, so it is not a general-purpose file server replacement.
- Customer-managed keys and bring your own storage are Enterprise-tier options, so organisations that cannot let a vendor hold their keys cannot use the published pricing at all.
Pricing, plan by plan
Duplicati
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Duplicati review.
LucidLink
$7/month- Starter$7/month
- 100GB included per member, pooled across the team
- Additional storage $7 per 100GB per month
- Client-side encryption
- Business$32/month
- $27 per member per month billed annually
- 400GB included per member, pooled across the team
- Additional storage $8 per 100GB per month
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Custom pricing and storage terms
- Customer-managed encryption keys
- Bring your own object storage bucket
Which should you pick?
Choose Duplicati if
- You need aes-256 encryption.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want incremental backup.
Choose LucidLink if
- You need filespaces.
- You work on macOS, Windows, Linux, iOS.
- You also want on-demand streaming.
Questions people ask
- Is Duplicati or LucidLink better?
- Neither clearly leads. Duplicati starts at Free and LucidLink at $7/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Duplicati or LucidLink?
- Duplicati has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Duplicati and $7/month for LucidLink.
- Does Duplicati or LucidLink run on more platforms?
- Duplicati runs on Windows, macOS, Linux. LucidLink runs on macOS, Windows, Linux, iOS.
- Can I use Duplicati for free?
- Yes. Duplicati has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. LucidLink starts at $7/month.
- What is Duplicati best used for?
- Duplicati is most often used for data protection, disaster recovery, business continuity, ransomware protection. Of those, data protection and disaster recovery are not what LucidLink is typically brought in for.
- What can Duplicati do that LucidLink cannot?
- Duplicati covers AES-256 encryption, Incremental backup, Deduplication, Multiple cloud backends. LucidLink covers Filespaces, On-demand streaming, Client-side encryption, Customer-managed keys.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Duplicati: Is Duplicati free?
Yes. Duplicati is completely free and open-source under the LGPL license. There are no premium tiers, trials, or limitations.
SourceLucidLink: What does storage actually cost?
$7 per 100GB per month on Starter and $8 per 100GB per month on Business, above the pooled allowance. Model this separately from the seat cost.
Duplicati: What does Duplicati support?
Duplicati supports zero-trust, fully encrypted backups to local storage, network drives, and cloud services. It includes deduplication and incremental backups.
SourceLucidLink: Can we hold our own encryption keys?
On the Enterprise tier, yes, along with pointing the filespace at your own S3 or Azure bucket. Not on Starter or Business.
Duplicati: What are the platforms?
Duplicati runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux. It can back up data to local storage, network drives, or cloud providers.
SourceLucidLink: Does it work for source code?
Not well. It is built for large sequential reads. Many small files is the workload it handles worst.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Duplicati vs Arq Backup
- Duplicati vs Carbonite
- Duplicati vs Ceph
- Duplicati vs TrueNAS
- Duplicati vs Nextcloud
- Duplicati vs pCloud
- Duplicati vs Sync.com
- Duplicati vs Tresorit
- Duplicati vs Backblaze
- Duplicati vs Cloudian
- Duplicati vs Storj
- Duplicati vs Microsoft OneDrive
- Duplicati vs Zerto
- Duplicati vs IDrive e2
- Duplicati vs Panzura
- Duplicati vs Nasuni
- Duplicati vs Google Drive
- Duplicati vs Cloudflare R2
- Duplicati vs Scality RING
- Duplicati vs Tigris
- Duplicati vs IDrive
- LucidLink vs Arq Backup
- LucidLink vs Carbonite
- LucidLink vs Ceph
- LucidLink vs TrueNAS
- LucidLink vs Nextcloud
- LucidLink vs pCloud
- LucidLink vs Sync.com
- LucidLink vs Tresorit
- LucidLink vs Backblaze
- LucidLink vs Cloudian
- LucidLink vs Storj
- LucidLink vs Microsoft OneDrive
- LucidLink vs Zerto
- LucidLink vs IDrive e2
- LucidLink vs Panzura
- LucidLink vs Nasuni
- LucidLink vs Google Drive
- LucidLink vs Cloudflare R2
- LucidLink vs Scality RING
- LucidLink vs Tigris
- LucidLink vs IDrive

