Cybersecurity · head to head
Snyk vs Very Good Security

Very Good Security
Cybersecurity
Tokenisation proxy that keeps card and personal data out of your own systems and out of PCI scope
- From
- $1000/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Snyk has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Snyk free plan has strict test limits across all modules: Open Source (200), Code (100), Infrastructure as Code (300), Container (100) tests per month; Very Good Security vGS sits in the live path of every request carrying sensitive data, so its latency and availability become yours, and an outage in the proxy is a payment outage no matter how healthy your own systems are.
- They diverge on capability: Snyk covers Open source security, Very Good Security covers Aliasing proxy.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Snyk and Very Good Security actually diverge.
| Attribute | Snyk | Very Good Security |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $1000/month |
| Pricing model | freemium | Per month |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, CLI, IDE integrations | Web, API |
| Founded | 2015 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Snyk
- Open source security
- Code security (SAST)
- Container security
- IaC security
- License compliance
- Fix PRs
- Priority scoring
- Developer IDE integration
Only in Very Good Security
- Aliasing proxy
- PCI scope reduction
- Network tokenisation
- Processor optionality
- Card issuing data
- Vault and access controls
- Data residency options
- Compliance artefacts
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Snyk
- Vulnerability scanningnot Very Good Security
- Application securitynot Very Good Security
- Infrastructure as Code securitynot Very Good Security
- Container securitynot Very Good Security
Very Good Security
- A marketplace facing its first PCI DSS Level 1 assessment that wants to keep card data off its own estate rather than harden a dozen servicesnot Snyk
- A merchant negotiating with a second acquirer that needs card credentials portable so the negotiation is real rather than theoreticalnot Snyk
- A fintech collecting bank account and identity documents that wants sensitive fields absent from logs, backups and analytics warehouses by constructionnot Snyk
- A card issuer that must display a full PAN in its own mobile app without the app or its backend touching cardholder datanot Snyk
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Snyk
- Free plan has strict test limits across all modules: Open Source (200), Code (100), Infrastructure as Code (300), Container (100) tests per month
- Free and Team plans count only contributing developers making commits within 90 days; public contributions do not count
- Enterprise plan requires custom pricing and sales contact
Very Good Security
- VGS sits in the live path of every request carrying sensitive data, so its latency and availability become yours, and an outage in the proxy is a payment outage no matter how healthy your own systems are.
- Token portability is the whole selling point yet leaving VGS means migrating tokens back out, a project the vendor has no incentive to streamline, so the lock-in you removed from your acquirer partly moves to VGS.
- Entry pricing at around one thousand US dollars a month is real money for a pre-revenue fintech, and it buys volume-limited throughput, so cost scales with exactly the growth that made you buy it.
- Scope reduction is not scope elimination: your QSA still assesses how you integrate, and teams regularly discover that a support tool or an internal admin screen pulled plaintext back in and dragged systems into scope again.
- Proxy-based interception constrains how you design request flows, and non-standard payloads, streaming uploads or binary formats often need custom routing rules that make debugging production issues noticeably harder.
Pricing, plan by plan
Snyk
Free- FreeFree
- SCA scanning
- SAST scanning
- IaC and Container scanning
- Team$25/month
- 1000 Code tests
- 100 projects
- Jira integration
- Ignite$105/month
- Unlimited tests
- Unlimited projects
- Custom security rules
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Zero-day prevention
- Unified AppSec control
- Full SDLC automation
Very Good Security
$1000/month- Starter$1000/month
- Aliasing proxy
- Vault storage
- PCI scope reduction
- Growth$undefined/month
- Network tokenisation
- Multiple processors
- Data residency options
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Custom vault architecture
- Dedicated support and SLA
- Contractual compliance coverage
Which should you pick?
Choose Snyk if
- You need open source security.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CLI, IDE integrations.
- You also want code security (sast).
Choose Very Good Security if
- You need aliasing proxy.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want pci scope reduction.
Questions people ask
- Is Snyk or Very Good Security better?
- Neither clearly leads. Snyk starts at Free and Very Good Security at $1000/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Snyk or Very Good Security?
- Snyk has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Snyk and $1000/month for Very Good Security.
- Does Snyk or Very Good Security run on more platforms?
- Snyk runs on Web, CLI, IDE integrations. Very Good Security runs on Web, API.
- Can I use Snyk for free?
- Yes. Snyk has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Very Good Security starts at $1000/month.
- What is Snyk best used for?
- Snyk is most often used for vulnerability scanning, application security, infrastructure as code security, container security. Of those, vulnerability scanning and application security are not what Very Good Security is typically brought in for.
- What can Snyk do that Very Good Security cannot?
- Snyk covers Open source security, Code security (SAST), Container security, IaC security. Very Good Security covers Aliasing proxy, PCI scope reduction, Network tokenisation, Processor optionality.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Snyk: How much does Snyk cost?
Snyk offers a free plan with limited tests, Team plan at $25/month per contributing developer, Ignite at $1260/year, and custom Enterprise pricing. Contributing developers are those who made commits to private repos within the last 90 days.
SourceVery Good Security: Does VGS make me PCI compliant?
No. It removes cardholder data from your systems so your assessment covers a far smaller boundary, but you still complete an assessment and your integration is part of it.
Snyk: What does Snyk's Team plan include?
The Team plan at $25/month includes 1000 Code tests, up to 100 projects, Jira integration, next business day support, and all features from the free plan including SCA, SAST, IaC and Container scanning.
SourceVery Good Security: Can I move to another processor without re-collecting cards?
Yes, that is a core reason people buy it. The vault reveals stored credentials to whichever processor you route to.
Snyk: Is there a free version of Snyk?
Yes, Snyk offers a free plan with full platform access including SCA, SAST, IaC and Container scanning. The free tier includes 200 Open Source tests, 100 Code tests, 300 IaC tests, 100 Container tests, and up to 5 projects.
SourceVery Good Security: What does it cost?
Published entry pricing is about one thousand US dollars per month; growth and enterprise tiers are quoted.
Very Good Security: Is it only for card data?
No. The proxy handles any sensitive field, including bank details, national identifiers and documents, though payments is where the product is now focused.
Related pages
More on Very Good Security
Other head to heads
- Snyk vs Aikido
- Snyk vs Trivy
- Snyk vs Grype
- Snyk vs Arnica
- Snyk vs Chainguard
- Snyk vs Falco
- Snyk vs Socket
- Snyk vs Endor Labs
- Snyk vs Legit Security
- Snyk vs 1Password
- Snyk vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Snyk vs Norton 360
- Snyk vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Snyk vs Infisical
- Snyk vs JumpCloud
- Snyk vs McAfee Total Protection
- Snyk vs NICE Actimize
- Snyk vs Semgrep
- Snyk vs Baffle
- Snyk vs HashiCorp Vault
- Snyk vs Feedzai
- Snyk vs Securiti
- Snyk vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Snyk vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Snyk vs LastPass
- Snyk vs DataGrail
- Snyk vs Transcend
- Snyk vs Doppler
- Snyk vs Tuta
- Snyk vs Delinea
- Snyk vs Envysion
- Snyk vs Frontegg
- Very Good Security vs Aikido
- Very Good Security vs Trivy
- Very Good Security vs Grype
- Very Good Security vs Arnica
- Very Good Security vs Chainguard
- Very Good Security vs Falco
- Very Good Security vs Socket
- Very Good Security vs Endor Labs
- Very Good Security vs Legit Security
- Very Good Security vs 1Password
- Very Good Security vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Very Good Security vs Norton 360
- Very Good Security vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Very Good Security vs Infisical
- Very Good Security vs JumpCloud
- Very Good Security vs McAfee Total Protection
- Very Good Security vs NICE Actimize
- Very Good Security vs Semgrep
- Very Good Security vs Baffle
- Very Good Security vs HashiCorp Vault
- Very Good Security vs Feedzai
- Very Good Security vs Securiti
- Very Good Security vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Very Good Security vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Very Good Security vs LastPass
- Very Good Security vs DataGrail
- Very Good Security vs Transcend
- Very Good Security vs Doppler
- Very Good Security vs Tuta
- Very Good Security vs Delinea
- Very Good Security vs Envysion
- Very Good Security vs Frontegg

