Cybersecurity · head to head
Diligent vs Infisical

Diligent
Cybersecurity
Board management and enterprise GRC platform assembled from Galvanize, Steele and Diligent Boards
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Infisical
Cybersecurity
Security infrastructure for developers and AI agents
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Infisical has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Diligent the platform is an assembly of acquisitions, with the analytics engine from ACL, risk from Rsam, ethics and third-party diligence from Steele and the board portal from Diligent itself, so cross-module reporting and consistent user experience should be tested in a proof of concept rather than assumed.; Infisical free tier limited to 5 identities, suitable only for small teams or evaluation
- They diverge on capability: Diligent covers Diligent Boards, Infisical covers Secrets management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Diligent and Infisical actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Diligent
- Diligent Boards
- Entity management
- Audit and analytics
- Risk management
- Third-party risk
- Ethics and compliance
- ESG and sustainability
- Market intelligence
Only in Infisical
- Secrets management
- Certificate management
- Privileged access management
- Secret versioning
- Dynamic secrets
- SAML SSO
- Open-source core
- Secrets scanning
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Diligent
- A listed company that wants board papers, entity records and the audit committee reporting pack produced from one governance systemnot Infisical
- An internal audit function moving from sampling to full-population transaction testing using the ACL heritage analytics enginenot Infisical
- A regulated firm consolidating a whistleblower hotline, third-party due diligence and policy attestation after an enforcement findingnot Infisical
- A group needing sustainability disclosure data collected with the same audit trail and controls as financial reportingnot Infisical
Infisical
- Managing secrets across Kubernetes clustersnot Diligent
- Automating certificate lifecycle for internal PKInot Diligent
- Providing privileged database access with audit trailsnot Diligent
- Securing credentials for AI agents at runtimenot Diligent
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Diligent
- The platform is an assembly of acquisitions, with the analytics engine from ACL, risk from Rsam, ethics and third-party diligence from Steele and the board portal from Diligent itself, so cross-module reporting and consistent user experience should be tested in a proof of concept rather than assumed.
- Pricing is unpublished and consistently at the top of the market, and organisations that need only one capability, a board portal or an audit analytics tool, generally pay less and get more from a specialist.
- Renewal leverage is weak once the board portal is embedded, because directors are the least willing user group to be migrated and that dependency is well understood by the vendor at renewal time.
- The analytics engine expects real data skills, and audit teams without an analytics-capable member typically use a fraction of what they licensed while paying for all of it.
- Module-by-module implementation means the promised single view of governance and risk usually arrives years after the first purchase, if the later modules are ever funded.
Infisical
- Free tier limited to 5 identities, suitable only for small teams or evaluation
- Pricing tiers are per-identity, which scales costs with team size
- Certificate management requires Enterprise plan for advanced features like wildcards
- Privileged access tier is separate billing from secrets management
Pricing, plan by plan
Diligent
On request- Diligent One Platform$undefined/year
- Quoted by module and user count
- Board portal seats priced separately from GRC modules
- Annual subscription, commonly multi-year
Infisical
Free- FreeFree
- 5 identities
- Unlimited projects
- 3 environments
- Pro - Secrets$20/month
- Per-identity pricing
- Unlimited identities
- SAML SSO
- Pro - Secrets (Annual)$20/year
- Annual discount available
- Unlimited identities
- SAML SSO
- Advanced - Secrets$40/month
- Per-identity pricing
- Dynamic secrets
- Gateways
Which should you pick?
Choose Diligent if
- You need diligent boards.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Windows.
- You also want entity management.
Choose Infisical if
- You need secrets management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CLI, Cloud, Self-Hosted.
- You also want certificate management.
Questions people ask
- Is Diligent or Infisical better?
- Neither clearly leads. Diligent starts at On request and Infisical at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Diligent or Infisical?
- Infisical has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Diligent and Free for Infisical.
- Does Diligent or Infisical run on more platforms?
- Diligent runs on Web, iOS, Android, Windows. Infisical runs on Web, CLI, Cloud, Self-Hosted.
- Can I use Infisical for free?
- Yes. Infisical has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Diligent starts at On request.
- What is Diligent best used for?
- Diligent is most often used for a listed company that wants board papers, entity records and the audit committee reporting pack produced from one governance system, an internal audit function moving from sampling to full-population transaction testing using the acl heritage analytics engine, a regulated firm consolidating a whistleblower hotline, third-party due diligence and policy attestation after an enforcement finding, a group needing sustainability disclosure data collected with the same audit trail and controls as financial reporting. Of those, a listed company that wants board papers, entity records and the audit committee reporting pack produced from one governance system and an internal audit function moving from sampling to full-population transaction testing using the acl heritage analytics engine are not what Infisical is typically brought in for.
- What can Diligent do that Infisical cannot?
- Diligent covers Diligent Boards, Entity management, Audit and analytics, Risk management. Infisical covers Secrets management, Certificate management, Privileged access management, Secret versioning.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Diligent: Is Diligent One the same product as Galvanize?
It contains it. Diligent bought Galvanize, the ACL and Rsam merger, for around one billion dollars in April 2021, and its audit analytics and risk modules are that heritage rebranded into Diligent One.
Infisical: How is pricing calculated for Secrets Management?
Pricing is per-identity per month. Free tier includes 5 identities. Pro tier is $20/identity/month, Advanced is $40/identity/month. All pricing in USD.
SourceDiligent: What does Diligent cost?
Not published. It is quoted by module and user, and board portal seats are priced differently from GRC seats. Expect an annual or multi-year enterprise agreement.
Infisical: Can I self-host Infisical?
Yes, Infisical's core is open-source under the MIT license and can be self-hosted. The managed cloud service is also available with additional features.
SourceDiligent: Can you buy just the board portal?
Yes, Diligent Boards is sold on its own and is the most common entry point. The GRC modules are separate purchases.
Infisical: What is included in the Enterprise plan?
Enterprise plan includes SCIM, LDAP, approval workflows, external KMS/HSM support, and 99.99% SLA. Pricing is custom and determined by annual commitment.
SourceDiligent: Does it replace a SOC 2 automation tool?
No. Diligent is aimed at enterprise audit, risk and governance, not at automated evidence collection for security certifications.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Diligent vs LogicManager
- Diligent vs Resolver
- Diligent vs MetricStream
- Diligent vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Diligent vs Transcend
- Diligent vs OneTrust
- Diligent vs Milestone XProtect
- Diligent vs Camio
- Diligent vs Delinea
- Diligent vs Dahua Technology
- Diligent vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Diligent vs IBM QRadar
- Diligent vs Trivy
- Diligent vs Trulioo
- Diligent vs Unit21
- Diligent vs Veracode
- Diligent vs Very Good Security
- Diligent vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Diligent vs Akeyless
- Diligent vs Doppler
- Diligent vs HashiCorp Vault
- Diligent vs Chainguard
- Diligent vs Authelia
- Diligent vs Bitwarden
- Diligent vs Semgrep
- Diligent vs Grype
- Diligent vs Ory Kratos
- Diligent vs Legit Security
- Diligent vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Diligent vs Metasploit
- Diligent vs Microsoft Defender
- Diligent vs Ory
- Diligent vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Infisical vs LogicManager
- Infisical vs Resolver
- Infisical vs MetricStream
- Infisical vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Infisical vs Transcend
- Infisical vs OneTrust
- Infisical vs Milestone XProtect
- Infisical vs Camio
- Infisical vs Delinea
- Infisical vs Dahua Technology
- Infisical vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Infisical vs IBM QRadar
- Infisical vs Trivy
- Infisical vs Trulioo
- Infisical vs Unit21
- Infisical vs Veracode
- Infisical vs Very Good Security
- Infisical vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Infisical vs Akeyless
- Infisical vs Doppler
- Infisical vs HashiCorp Vault
- Infisical vs Chainguard
- Infisical vs Authelia
- Infisical vs Bitwarden
- Infisical vs Semgrep
- Infisical vs Grype
- Infisical vs Ory Kratos
- Infisical vs Legit Security
- Infisical vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Infisical vs Metasploit
- Infisical vs Microsoft Defender
- Infisical vs Ory
- Infisical vs Microsoft Sentinel
