Cybersecurity · head to head
Diligent vs IDnow

Diligent
Cybersecurity
Board management and enterprise GRC platform assembled from Galvanize, Steele and Diligent Boards
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

IDnow
Cybersecurity
Identity verification and qualified electronic signature for regulated European markets
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Diligent the platform is an assembly of acquisitions, with the analytics engine from ACL, risk from Rsam, ethics and third-party diligence from Steele and the board portal from Diligent itself, so cross-module reporting and consistent user experience should be tested in a proof of concept rather than assumed.; IDnow agent-led video identification costs several times an automated check and depends on agent availability, so peak-time queues push abandonment up at exactly the moment conversion matters.
- They diverge on capability: Diligent covers Diligent Boards, IDnow covers VideoIdent.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Diligent and IDnow actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Diligent
- Diligent Boards
- Entity management
- Audit and analytics
- Risk management
- Third-party risk
- Ethics and compliance
- ESG and sustainability
- Market intelligence
Only in IDnow
- VideoIdent
- AutoIdent
- eSign
- eID and NFC
- Bank identification
- EU data processing
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Diligent
- A listed company that wants board papers, entity records and the audit committee reporting pack produced from one governance systemnot IDnow
- An internal audit function moving from sampling to full-population transaction testing using the ACL heritage analytics enginenot IDnow
- A regulated firm consolidating a whistleblower hotline, third-party due diligence and policy attestation after an enforcement findingnot IDnow
- A group needing sustainability disclosure data collected with the same audit trail and controls as financial reportingnot IDnow
IDnow
- A German bank opening regulated accounts where BaFin requires a recognised identification methodnot Diligent
- An insurer needing a qualified electronic signature that will survive challenge in a European courtnot Diligent
- A telecom operator meeting national SIM registration identity rules across several EU statesnot Diligent
- A lender wanting automated checks for low-risk applicants and video identification only for high-value casesnot Diligent
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Diligent
- The platform is an assembly of acquisitions, with the analytics engine from ACL, risk from Rsam, ethics and third-party diligence from Steele and the board portal from Diligent itself, so cross-module reporting and consistent user experience should be tested in a proof of concept rather than assumed.
- Pricing is unpublished and consistently at the top of the market, and organisations that need only one capability, a board portal or an audit analytics tool, generally pay less and get more from a specialist.
- Renewal leverage is weak once the board portal is embedded, because directors are the least willing user group to be migrated and that dependency is well understood by the vendor at renewal time.
- The analytics engine expects real data skills, and audit teams without an analytics-capable member typically use a fraction of what they licensed while paying for all of it.
- Module-by-module implementation means the promised single view of governance and risk usually arrives years after the first purchase, if the later modules are ever funded.
IDnow
- Agent-led video identification costs several times an automated check and depends on agent availability, so peak-time queues push abandonment up at exactly the moment conversion matters.
- Pricing is quoted with an annual volume commitment, so the accreditation advantage comes with a floor you pay whether or not you use it.
- The product is optimised for European regulatory regimes, so buyers verifying users in North America, Asia or Africa will find coverage and cost less competitive than global specialists.
- Qualified electronic signature is a separate licence from identity verification, which surprises buyers who assumed the accredited identity check made the signature capability included.
- Integration for the regulated flows is heavier than a simple SDK drop-in because the compliant journey, including consent and recording requirements, constrains the user experience you can build.
Pricing, plan by plan
Diligent
On request- Diligent One Platform$undefined/year
- Quoted by module and user count
- Board portal seats priced separately from GRC modules
- Annual subscription, commonly multi-year
IDnow
On request- IDnow Platform$undefined/year
- Per-identification pricing that differs sharply between automated and agent-led methods
- Annual volume commitment typically required
- Qualified electronic signature licensed separately
Which should you pick?
Choose Diligent if
- You need diligent boards.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Windows.
- You also want entity management.
Choose IDnow if
- You need videoident.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- You also want autoident.
Questions people ask
- Is Diligent or IDnow better?
- Neither clearly leads. Diligent starts at On request and IDnow at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Diligent or IDnow?
- Diligent starts at On request and IDnow at On request.
- Does Diligent or IDnow run on more platforms?
- Diligent runs on Web, iOS, Android, Windows. IDnow runs on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- What is Diligent best used for?
- Diligent is most often used for a listed company that wants board papers, entity records and the audit committee reporting pack produced from one governance system, an internal audit function moving from sampling to full-population transaction testing using the acl heritage analytics engine, a regulated firm consolidating a whistleblower hotline, third-party due diligence and policy attestation after an enforcement finding, a group needing sustainability disclosure data collected with the same audit trail and controls as financial reporting. Of those, a listed company that wants board papers, entity records and the audit committee reporting pack produced from one governance system and an internal audit function moving from sampling to full-population transaction testing using the acl heritage analytics engine are not what IDnow is typically brought in for.
- What can Diligent do that IDnow cannot?
- Diligent covers Diligent Boards, Entity management, Audit and analytics, Risk management. IDnow covers VideoIdent, AutoIdent, eSign, eID and NFC.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Diligent: Is Diligent One the same product as Galvanize?
It contains it. Diligent bought Galvanize, the ACL and Rsam merger, for around one billion dollars in April 2021, and its audit analytics and risk modules are that heritage rebranded into Diligent One.
IDnow: Why choose it over a cheaper automated vendor?
Because in some European regimes the cheaper vendor is not legally permitted for the transaction. This is an eligibility question, not a quality one.
Diligent: What does Diligent cost?
Not published. It is quoted by module and user, and board portal seats are priced differently from GRC seats. Expect an annual or multi-year enterprise agreement.
IDnow: Is the electronic signature included?
No. Qualified electronic signature under eIDAS is licensed separately from identity verification.
Diligent: Can you buy just the board portal?
Yes, Diligent Boards is sold on its own and is the most common entry point. The GRC modules are separate purchases.
IDnow: Where is the data processed?
In European data centres, which is a requirement rather than a preference for many of its regulated customers.
Diligent: Does it replace a SOC 2 automation tool?
No. Diligent is aimed at enterprise audit, risk and governance, not at automated evidence collection for security certifications.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Diligent vs LogicManager
- Diligent vs Resolver
- Diligent vs MetricStream
- Diligent vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Diligent vs Transcend
- Diligent vs OneTrust
- Diligent vs Milestone XProtect
- Diligent vs Camio
- Diligent vs Delinea
- Diligent vs Dahua Technology
- Diligent vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Diligent vs IBM QRadar
- Diligent vs Trivy
- Diligent vs Trulioo
- Diligent vs Unit21
- Diligent vs Veracode
- Diligent vs Very Good Security
- Diligent vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Diligent vs iDenfy
- Diligent vs Veriff
- Diligent vs Yoti
- Diligent vs Signicat
- Diligent vs Jumio
- Diligent vs Shufti Pro
- Diligent vs Sumsub
- Diligent vs Socure
- Diligent vs Fenergo
- Diligent vs Quantexa
- Diligent vs Salient CompleteView
- Diligent vs Osano
- Diligent vs Proton Mail
- Diligent vs Brave Browser
- Diligent vs March Networks
- IDnow vs LogicManager
- IDnow vs Resolver
- IDnow vs MetricStream
- IDnow vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- IDnow vs Transcend
- IDnow vs OneTrust
- IDnow vs Milestone XProtect
- IDnow vs Camio
- IDnow vs Delinea
- IDnow vs Dahua Technology
- IDnow vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- IDnow vs IBM QRadar
- IDnow vs Trivy
- IDnow vs Trulioo
- IDnow vs Unit21
- IDnow vs Veracode
- IDnow vs Very Good Security
- IDnow vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- IDnow vs iDenfy
- IDnow vs Veriff
- IDnow vs Yoti
- IDnow vs Signicat
- IDnow vs Jumio
- IDnow vs Shufti Pro
- IDnow vs Sumsub
- IDnow vs Socure
- IDnow vs Fenergo
- IDnow vs Quantexa
- IDnow vs Salient CompleteView
- IDnow vs Osano
- IDnow vs Proton Mail
- IDnow vs Brave Browser
- IDnow vs March Networks
