Databases · head to head
Cassandra vs Dgraph

Cassandra
Databases
Manage massive amounts of data with linear scalability
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Dgraph
Databases
Apache 2.0 distributed graph database written in Go, maintained by Hypermode, queried through GraphQL or its own DQL language.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cassandra no support for joins across tables; Dgraph sharding is by predicate, so a single very hot predicate lives entirely in one Raft group and cannot be split further; adding nodes does not relieve it and the fix is a data model change.
- They diverge on capability: Cassandra covers Linear Scalability, Dgraph covers Apache 2.0 licence.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cassandra and Dgraph actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cassandra
- Linear Scalability
- Fault Tolerance
- Multi-datacenter Replication
- Tunable Consistency
- CQL Query Language
- Distributed Architecture
- No Single Point of Failure
- DataStax
Only in Dgraph
- Apache 2.0 licence
- Generated GraphQL API
- DQL query language
- Predicate sharding
- Raft replication
- Distributed ACID transactions
- Written in Go
- Full-text and geo indexing
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cassandra
- Real-time applicationsnot Dgraph
- Content managementnot Dgraph
- User profilesnot Dgraph
- Mobile backendsnot Dgraph
- Cachingnot Dgraph
Dgraph
- An application whose core data is a graph, such as permissions, social connections or product relationships, where the frontend already consumes GraphQLnot Cassandra
- A knowledge graph that outgrew a single machine and needs storage distributed across nodes without a per-core licence negotiationnot Cassandra
- Recommendation or fraud-detection features that traverse several hops at request time, where a relational join chain has become the bottlenecknot Cassandra
- Teams that want a graph database they can read, fork and self-host under a permissive licence rather than a source-available onenot Cassandra
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cassandra
- No support for joins across tables
- No ACID transactions across multiple rows
- Data model must be designed around query patterns upfront, making schema evolution difficult
- Partition key misconfigurations can cause uneven data distribution and hotspots that degrade performance
Dgraph
- Sharding is by predicate, so a single very hot predicate lives entirely in one Raft group and cannot be split further; adding nodes does not relieve it and the fix is a data model change.
- Stewardship passed from Dgraph Labs to Hypermode after the original company stopped operating independently, so anyone building on it is betting on a second custodian rather than on the original team's roadmap.
- The GraphQL layer is generated and opinionated, so anything it does not express drops you into DQL, which is a second language your team must learn and which no other database speaks.
- The community is a fraction of Neo4j's, so operational answers, tuning experience, hiring and third-party tooling are all thinner, and unusual failure modes in a Zero and Alpha cluster leave you reading source rather than a forum.
- There is no portable graph standard to migrate to; Cypher, Gremlin and SPARQL are all different query models, so the schema and every query is a rewrite if you later leave, and that cost grows with the application.
Pricing, plan by plan
Cassandra
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Cassandra review.
Dgraph
Free- CommunityFree
- Native GraphQL
- Graph queries
- Full-text search
- Cloud$39/month
- Managed service
- Auto-scaling
- Enterprise support
Which should you pick?
Choose Cassandra if
- You need linear scalability.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want fault tolerance.
Choose Dgraph if
- You need apache 2.0 licence.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Mac, Docker, Web.
- You also want generated graphql api.
Questions people ask
- Is Cassandra or Dgraph better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cassandra starts at Free and Dgraph at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cassandra or Dgraph?
- Cassandra starts at Free and Dgraph at Free.
- Does Cassandra or Dgraph run on more platforms?
- Cassandra runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes. Dgraph runs on Linux, Mac, Docker, Web.
- Can I use Cassandra for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cassandra best used for?
- Cassandra is most often used for real-time applications, content management, user profiles, mobile backends. Of those, real-time applications and content management are not what Dgraph is typically brought in for.
- What can Cassandra do that Dgraph cannot?
- Cassandra covers Linear Scalability, Fault Tolerance, Multi-datacenter Replication, Tunable Consistency. Dgraph covers Apache 2.0 licence, Generated GraphQL API, DQL query language, Predicate sharding.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cassandra: Does Cassandra support joins between tables?
No. Cassandra does not support joins or foreign keys. The data model requires denormalization, meaning data must be duplicated across tables to support different query patterns.
SourceDgraph: Is Dgraph open source?
Yes. The current repository is Apache 2.0, which is a permissive OSI licence, and the project is at v25 under Hypermode's maintenance.
Cassandra: Does Cassandra offer ACID transactions?
No. Cassandra provides only row-level atomicity and isolation, not full ACID transactions across multiple rows or tables. It uses lightweight transactions via Paxos for per-row compare-and-set operations.
SourceDgraph: Is it really GraphQL?
It serves a generated GraphQL API, which is real GraphQL for clients. Its native language, DQL, resembles GraphQL syntactically but is Dgraph's own language and is not the GraphQL specification.
Cassandra: What programming languages can connect to Cassandra?
Cassandra supports official drivers for multiple languages including Python, Java, Node.js, and Go, allowing applications to communicate via the native Cassandra protocol.
SourceDgraph: How does it compare to Neo4j?
Neo4j has the larger ecosystem, Cypher, and far more operational precedent. Dgraph distributes storage across nodes by default and gives you a GraphQL endpoint without writing resolvers. The choice usually turns on whether you need horizontal scale and a GraphQL surface more than you need ecosystem depth.
Cassandra: Can I deploy Cassandra in the cloud?
Yes. Cassandra can run on any cloud platform (AWS, Google Cloud, Azure) via Docker, virtual machines, or managed services like DataStax Astra DB, which provides a fully managed DBaaS option.
SourceDgraph: What does a production cluster look like?
At minimum a set of Zero nodes for coordination and a replicated set of Alpha nodes for data, typically three of each for fault tolerance, which is a meaningfully larger operational footprint than a single graph server.
Cassandra: Does Cassandra have a free option?
The open source Apache Cassandra is free. DataStax also offers Astra DB with a free tier providing up to 25GB storage and 25 million read/write operations per month.
SourceDgraph: Who maintains it now?
Hypermode. Dgraph Labs, the original company, no longer operates it, and that change of custodian is the main non-technical risk to weigh.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Cassandra vs Couchbase
- Cassandra vs Elasticsearch
- Cassandra vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Cassandra vs YugabyteDB
- Cassandra vs DynamoDB
- Cassandra vs ClickHouse
- Cassandra vs ScyllaDB
- Cassandra vs RavenDB
- Cassandra vs DataGrip
- Cassandra vs Cockroach Labs
- Cassandra vs Neo4j
- Cassandra vs EMQX
- Cassandra vs FaunaDB
- Cassandra vs Memcached
- Cassandra vs MotherDuck
- Cassandra vs Firestore
- Cassandra vs Airtable
- Cassandra vs PostgreSQL
- Cassandra vs Amazon Aurora
- Cassandra vs ArangoDB
- Cassandra vs Convex
- Cassandra vs Dragonfly
- Cassandra vs Dremio
- Cassandra vs Fivetran HVR
- Cassandra vs Grist
- Cassandra vs IBM Db2
- Dgraph vs Couchbase
- Dgraph vs Elasticsearch
- Dgraph vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Dgraph vs YugabyteDB
- Dgraph vs DynamoDB
- Dgraph vs ClickHouse
- Dgraph vs ScyllaDB
- Dgraph vs RavenDB
- Dgraph vs DataGrip
- Dgraph vs Cockroach Labs
- Dgraph vs Neo4j
- Dgraph vs EMQX
- Dgraph vs FaunaDB
- Dgraph vs Memcached
- Dgraph vs MotherDuck
- Dgraph vs Firestore
- Dgraph vs Airtable
- Dgraph vs PostgreSQL
- Dgraph vs Amazon Aurora
- Dgraph vs ArangoDB
- Dgraph vs Convex
- Dgraph vs Dragonfly
- Dgraph vs Dremio
- Dgraph vs Fivetran HVR
- Dgraph vs Grist
- Dgraph vs IBM Db2
