Databases · head to head
Knack vs TiDB

Knack
Databases
Hosted no-code database and web app builder priced by stored records and storage, with unlimited user accounts on every plan.
- From
- $59/month
- Rated
- -

TiDB
Databases
Apache 2.0 distributed SQL database with MySQL wire compatibility and a separate columnar replica for analytical queries.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only TiDB has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Knack plans are capped by stored records, so an application that logs events or keeps history rather than current state climbs tiers on data volume alone, and archiving old records becomes a permanent maintenance chore rather than a one-off.; TiDB a production cluster needs several placement driver, storage and SQL nodes before it is fault tolerant, so the minimum viable footprint is far larger than a MySQL server and TiDB is never the economical choice for a small database.
- They diverge on capability: Knack covers Visual database builder, TiDB covers MySQL wire compatibility.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Knack and TiDB actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Knack
- Visual database builder
- User logins and roles
- Page builder
- Unlimited users
- E-commerce
- Automation flows
- Scheduled tasks
- REST API and webhooks
Only in TiDB
- MySQL wire compatibility
- Horizontal write scaling
- Distributed ACID transactions
- TiFlash columnar replica
- Automatic rebalancing
- Raft replication
- Apache 2.0 licence
- Online schema change
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Knack
- A member or client portal where thousands of external people need their own login and see only their own recordsnot TiDB
- Replacing a shared spreadsheet used by a team that has outgrown it but cannot justify a developer to build a bespoke internal toolnot TiDB
- Inventory, asset or case tracking for a small operations team that needs roles, forms and a record of who changed whatnot TiDB
- A registration or booking application for an association, school or non-profit where the user count is large and the record count stays modestnot TiDB
TiDB
- A MySQL workload that has hit the write ceiling of a single primary and would otherwise need an application-level sharding layernot Knack
- Reporting that must run against current transactional data, where the columnar replica removes the delay and the cost of an ETL pipelinenot Knack
- Multi-region deployments needing a single logical database with automatic failover rather than manual primary promotionnot Knack
- Migrating off a sharded MySQL estate where the sharding logic in the application has become the main source of bugs and operational toilnot Knack
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Knack
- Plans are capped by stored records, so an application that logs events or keeps history rather than current state climbs tiers on data volume alone, and archiving old records becomes a permanent maintenance chore rather than a one-off.
- API access is capped per day, at 1,000 calls on the entry plan and 10,000 at the Corporate tier, so a scheduled sync or a busy automation can exhaust the day's quota before the working day ends and integrations then fail silently.
- The application itself cannot be exported or self-hosted; records can be downloaded but the pages, roles, flows and business logic exist only inside Knack, so outgrowing the platform means rebuilding the app rather than moving it.
- Customisation beyond the builder is limited to injected CSS and JavaScript that Knack's support does not cover, so any non-standard interface behaviour becomes yours to maintain against a DOM the vendor can change without warning.
- Compliance capabilities that regulated buyers assume are baseline, HIPAA and GovCloud options, advanced SSO, IP restrictions and private environments, are gated to the Corporate and Enterprise tiers, so a small regulated pilot cannot legitimately start on an entry plan.
TiDB
- A production cluster needs several placement driver, storage and SQL nodes before it is fault tolerant, so the minimum viable footprint is far larger than a MySQL server and TiDB is never the economical choice for a small database.
- Every transaction takes a timestamp from the placement driver and crosses the network to storage nodes, so simple point queries are slower than on single-node MySQL and latency-sensitive paths need to be measured, not assumed.
- MySQL compatibility is at the wire and dialect level but not complete; stored procedures, triggers and events are not supported, so an application that pushed logic into the database cannot simply be repointed.
- The columnar replica is an extra full copy of the data on its own nodes, so hybrid analytics roughly doubles storage and adds hardware that must be sized and paid for separately.
- Operating it well requires cluster-specific expertise in TiUP or the Kubernetes operator, region hot spots, and rebalancing behaviour, so the licence is free but the running cost includes an engineer who understands distributed storage.
Pricing, plan by plan
Knack
$59/month- Starter$59/month
- 20,000 database records
- Unlimited users, tables, fields
- 25 AI credits
- Pro$130/month
- 50,000 database records
- Remove Knack branding
- E-commerce payments
- Corporate$300/month
- 125,000-2.5M database records
- App restore functionality
- Advanced SSO
- Enterprise$null/month
- Dedicated account manager
- HIPAA/GovCloud-based options
- Custom pricing
TiDB
Free- ServerlessFree
- 5GB storage
- 50M request units
- Free forever tier
- Dedicated$250/month
- Dedicated resources
- SLA guarantees
- Enterprise support
Which should you pick?
Choose TiDB if
- You need mysql wire compatibility.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, AWS, Azure, Google Cloud Platform, Self-managed.
- You also want horizontal write scaling.
Questions people ask
- Is Knack or TiDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. Knack starts at $59/month and TiDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Knack or TiDB?
- TiDB has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $59/month for Knack and Free for TiDB.
- Does Knack or TiDB run on more platforms?
- Knack runs on Web. TiDB runs on Cloud, AWS, Azure, Google Cloud Platform, Self-managed.
- Can I use TiDB for free?
- Yes. TiDB has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Knack starts at $59/month.
- What is Knack best used for?
- Knack is most often used for a member or client portal where thousands of external people need their own login and see only their own records, replacing a shared spreadsheet used by a team that has outgrown it but cannot justify a developer to build a bespoke internal tool, inventory, asset or case tracking for a small operations team that needs roles, forms and a record of who changed what, a registration or booking application for an association, school or non-profit where the user count is large and the record count stays modest. Of those, a member or client portal where thousands of external people need their own login and see only their own records and replacing a shared spreadsheet used by a team that has outgrown it but cannot justify a developer to build a bespoke internal tool are not what TiDB is typically brought in for.
- What can Knack do that TiDB cannot?
- Knack covers Visual database builder, User logins and roles, Page builder, Unlimited users. TiDB covers MySQL wire compatibility, Horizontal write scaling, Distributed ACID transactions, TiFlash columnar replica.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Knack: Is Knack charged per user?
No. User accounts are unlimited on all plans. Plans are bounded by stored record count, file storage, API calls per day and automation transactions.
TiDB: Is TiDB a drop-in replacement for MySQL?
At the protocol and dialect level it is close, and most applications connect unchanged. Stored procedures, triggers and events are not supported, and latency characteristics differ, so it needs testing rather than assumption.
Knack: What happens when I exceed the record limit?
You move to a higher tier or reduce stored records. Because the limit is on data rather than people, apps that accumulate history hit it while apps that track a fixed set of entities generally do not.
TiDB: What licence is it under?
Apache 2.0, for both TiDB and the underlying TiKV storage engine. TiKV is a graduated CNCF project, which is a meaningful governance signal in a market where several competitors moved to source-available licences.
Knack: Can I export my application or self-host it?
You can export record data. The application itself, its pages, roles, permissions and flows, is not exportable and cannot be self-hosted, so leaving means rebuilding elsewhere.
TiDB: Do I need TiFlash?
Only for analytical queries. It is an optional columnar replica; without it TiDB is a distributed transactional database. With it you get analytics on live data at the cost of an additional full copy.
Knack: Is it suitable for public-facing portals?
That is its strongest case, because logins are unlimited and role-based permissions are built in. The constraint is record volume and API throughput, not audience size.
TiDB: Is the managed cloud the same software?
TiDB Cloud runs the same engine, with the control plane, scaling and operational tooling provided as a service. The entry tier is metered differently from a dedicated cluster, so the cost model rather than the engine is what changes.
Knack: Can I use it for regulated data?
HIPAA-aligned and government cloud options exist but only on the Enterprise tier, along with private server environments. Lower tiers should not be used for regulated workloads.
TiDB: When is TiDB the wrong choice?
When the database is small enough for one server, when latency on single-row lookups is the primary constraint, or when the application depends on MySQL stored procedures and triggers.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Knack vs Airtable
- Knack vs Cockroach Labs
- Knack vs PostgreSQL
- Knack vs Amazon Aurora
- Knack vs BigQuery
- Knack vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Knack vs Dremio
- Knack vs DuckDB
- Knack vs Immuta
- Knack vs Turso
- Knack vs FaunaDB
- Knack vs Ninox
- Knack vs TimescaleDB
- Knack vs Apache Pinot
- Knack vs Amazon RDS
- Knack vs Apache Pulsar
- Knack vs Amazon Redshift
- Knack vs Vitess
- Knack vs Elasticsearch
- Knack vs SingleStore
- Knack vs ClickHouse
- Knack vs Apache Druid
- Knack vs Couchbase
- Knack vs MariaDB
- Knack vs Redpanda
- Knack vs RisingWave
- Knack vs ScyllaDB
- Knack vs Solace PubSub+
- Knack vs SQLite
- Knack vs StarRocks
- TiDB vs Airtable
- TiDB vs Cockroach Labs
- TiDB vs PostgreSQL
- TiDB vs Amazon Aurora
- TiDB vs BigQuery
- TiDB vs Firebase Realtime Database
- TiDB vs Dremio
- TiDB vs DuckDB
- TiDB vs Immuta
- TiDB vs Turso
- TiDB vs FaunaDB
- TiDB vs Ninox
- TiDB vs TimescaleDB
- TiDB vs Apache Pinot
- TiDB vs Amazon RDS
- TiDB vs Apache Pulsar
- TiDB vs Amazon Redshift
- TiDB vs Vitess
- TiDB vs Elasticsearch
- TiDB vs SingleStore
- TiDB vs ClickHouse
- TiDB vs Apache Druid
- TiDB vs Couchbase
- TiDB vs MariaDB
- TiDB vs Redpanda
- TiDB vs RisingWave
- TiDB vs ScyllaDB
- TiDB vs Solace PubSub+
- TiDB vs SQLite
- TiDB vs StarRocks
