Databases · head to head
Dgraph vs SQLite
Dgraph
Databases
Apache 2.0 distributed graph database written in Go, maintained by Hypermode, queried through GraphQL or its own DQL language.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Dgraph sharding is by predicate, so a single very hot predicate lives entirely in one Raft group and cannot be split further; adding nodes does not relieve it and the fix is a data model change.; SQLite supports only serialized write operations; only one process can modify the database at any moment, limiting concurrent users
- They diverge on capability: Dgraph covers Apache 2.0 licence, SQLite covers Serverless Operation.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Dgraph and SQLite actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Dgraph
- Apache 2.0 licence
- Generated GraphQL API
- DQL query language
- Predicate sharding
- Raft replication
- Distributed ACID transactions
- Written in Go
- Full-text and geo indexing
Only in SQLite
- Serverless Operation
- Zero Configuration
- Single File Database
- Cross-platform
- Full SQL Support
- ACID Compliance
- Self-contained
- Browser Storage
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Dgraph
- An application whose core data is a graph, such as permissions, social connections or product relationships, where the frontend already consumes GraphQLnot SQLite
- A knowledge graph that outgrew a single machine and needs storage distributed across nodes without a per-core licence negotiationnot SQLite
- Recommendation or fraud-detection features that traverse several hops at request time, where a relational join chain has become the bottlenecknot SQLite
- Teams that want a graph database they can read, fork and self-host under a permissive licence rather than a source-available onenot SQLite
SQLite
- Transaction processingnot Dgraph
- Data storagenot Dgraph
- Application backendnot Dgraph
- Reportingnot Dgraph
- Data analyticsnot Dgraph
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Dgraph
- Sharding is by predicate, so a single very hot predicate lives entirely in one Raft group and cannot be split further; adding nodes does not relieve it and the fix is a data model change.
- Stewardship passed from Dgraph Labs to Hypermode after the original company stopped operating independently, so anyone building on it is betting on a second custodian rather than on the original team's roadmap.
- The GraphQL layer is generated and opinionated, so anything it does not express drops you into DQL, which is a second language your team must learn and which no other database speaks.
- The community is a fraction of Neo4j's, so operational answers, tuning experience, hiring and third-party tooling are all thinner, and unusual failure modes in a Zero and Alpha cluster leave you reading source rather than a forum.
- There is no portable graph standard to migrate to; Cypher, Gremlin and SPARQL are all different query models, so the schema and every query is a rewrite if you later leave, and that cost grows with the application.
SQLite
- Supports only serialized write operations; only one process can modify the database at any moment, limiting concurrent users
- No multi-user support or granular access control; relies on file system permissions for security only
- Limited ALTER TABLE functionality cannot edit or modify columns in existing tables
Pricing, plan by plan
Dgraph
Free- CommunityFree
- Native GraphQL
- Graph queries
- Full-text search
- Cloud$39/month
- Managed service
- Auto-scaling
- Enterprise support
SQLite
Free- Public DomainFree
- Serverless
- Zero-configuration
- Cross-platform
Which should you pick?
Choose Dgraph if
- You need apache 2.0 licence.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Mac, Docker, Web.
- You also want generated graphql api.
Choose SQLite if
- You need serverless operation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android.
- You also want zero configuration.
Questions people ask
- Is Dgraph or SQLite better?
- Neither clearly leads. Dgraph starts at Free and SQLite at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Dgraph or SQLite?
- Dgraph starts at Free and SQLite at Free.
- Does Dgraph or SQLite run on more platforms?
- Dgraph runs on Linux, Mac, Docker, Web. SQLite runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Dgraph for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Dgraph best used for?
- Dgraph is most often used for an application whose core data is a graph, such as permissions, social connections or product relationships, where the frontend already consumes graphql, a knowledge graph that outgrew a single machine and needs storage distributed across nodes without a per-core licence negotiation, recommendation or fraud-detection features that traverse several hops at request time, where a relational join chain has become the bottleneck, teams that want a graph database they can read, fork and self-host under a permissive licence rather than a source-available one. Of those, an application whose core data is a graph, such as permissions, social connections or product relationships, where the frontend already consumes graphql and a knowledge graph that outgrew a single machine and needs storage distributed across nodes without a per-core licence negotiation are not what SQLite is typically brought in for.
- What can Dgraph do that SQLite cannot?
- Dgraph covers Apache 2.0 licence, Generated GraphQL API, DQL query language, Predicate sharding. SQLite covers Serverless Operation, Zero Configuration, Single File Database, Cross-platform.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Dgraph: Is Dgraph open source?
Yes. The current repository is Apache 2.0, which is a permissive OSI licence, and the project is at v25 under Hypermode's maintenance.
SQLite: Is SQLite free and open source?
Yes, SQLite is open source and in the public domain. The complete source code and binaries are free to download and use for any purpose without restrictions.
SourceDgraph: Is it really GraphQL?
It serves a generated GraphQL API, which is real GraphQL for clients. Its native language, DQL, resembles GraphQL syntactically but is Dgraph's own language and is not the GraphQL specification.
SQLite: How does SQLite work and what is its design?
SQLite is a self-contained, serverless SQL database engine that reads and writes directly to disk files. It requires no separate server process and runs within your application, making it ideal for embedded systems and local storage.
SourceDgraph: How does it compare to Neo4j?
Neo4j has the larger ecosystem, Cypher, and far more operational precedent. Dgraph distributes storage across nodes by default and gives you a GraphQL endpoint without writing resolvers. The choice usually turns on whether you need horizontal scale and a GraphQL surface more than you need ecosystem depth.
SQLite: What are SQLite's limitations for scaling?
SQLite does not support true multi-user concurrency. Only one process can write to the database at a time, and it lacks user management and access control features. It is designed for small to medium projects, not enterprise applications with many concurrent users.
SourceDgraph: What does a production cluster look like?
At minimum a set of Zero nodes for coordination and a replicated set of Alpha nodes for data, typically three of each for fault tolerance, which is a meaningfully larger operational footprint than a single graph server.
SQLite: Can I use SQLite for production web applications?
SQLite can work for single-server web applications with modest concurrency needs. However, it lacks features like user management, granular security, and sophisticated query optimization needed for large-scale applications.
SourceDgraph: Who maintains it now?
Hypermode. Dgraph Labs, the original company, no longer operates it, and that change of custodian is the main non-technical risk to weigh.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Dgraph vs Cockroach Labs
- Dgraph vs Airtable
- Dgraph vs PostgreSQL
- Dgraph vs Amazon Aurora
- Dgraph vs Neo4j
- Dgraph vs ArangoDB
- Dgraph vs Elasticsearch
- Dgraph vs Couchbase
- Dgraph vs Cassandra
- Dgraph vs FaunaDB
- Dgraph vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Dgraph vs RavenDB
- Dgraph vs Convex
- Dgraph vs Dragonfly
- Dgraph vs Dremio
- Dgraph vs Fivetran HVR
- Dgraph vs Grist
- Dgraph vs IBM Db2
- Dgraph vs DuckDB
- Dgraph vs MariaDB
- Dgraph vs Oracle Database
- Dgraph vs Materialize
- Dgraph vs DataGrip
- Dgraph vs Google Cloud SQL
- Dgraph vs Microsoft SQL Server
- Dgraph vs Chroma
- Dgraph vs Turso
- Dgraph vs Immuta
- Dgraph vs TimescaleDB
- SQLite vs Cockroach Labs
- SQLite vs Airtable
- SQLite vs PostgreSQL
- SQLite vs Amazon Aurora
- SQLite vs Neo4j
- SQLite vs ArangoDB
- SQLite vs Elasticsearch
- SQLite vs Couchbase
- SQLite vs Cassandra
- SQLite vs FaunaDB
- SQLite vs Firebase Realtime Database
- SQLite vs RavenDB
- SQLite vs Convex
- SQLite vs Dragonfly
- SQLite vs Dremio
- SQLite vs Fivetran HVR
- SQLite vs Grist
- SQLite vs IBM Db2
- SQLite vs DuckDB
- SQLite vs MariaDB
- SQLite vs Oracle Database
- SQLite vs Materialize
- SQLite vs DataGrip
- SQLite vs Google Cloud SQL
- SQLite vs Microsoft SQL Server
- SQLite vs Chroma
- SQLite vs Turso
- SQLite vs Immuta
- SQLite vs TimescaleDB