Developer Tools · head to head
Depot vs Okteto

Depot
Developer Tools
Cloud-based builds and CI runs 55x faster with less cost
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Okteto
Developer Tools
Runs production-like development environments on your own Kubernetes cluster
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Depot developer plan minute limits may be insufficient for active development; Okteto two of the three plans publish no price at all, with no currency and no billing period stated anywhere, so any budget above five seats requires a sales conversation before you can even compare it with an alternative.
- They diverge on capability: Depot covers Depot CI, Okteto covers Cluster development environments.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Depot and Okteto actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Developer Tools).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Depot
- Depot CI
- Container builds
- GitHub Actions runners
- Distributed caching
- Build API
- Depot Registry
- Cross-platform builds
- SSH debugging
Only in Okteto
- Cluster development environments
- File synchronisation
- Development containers
- Environment catalogue
- Preview environments
- Bring your own cloud
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Depot
- Accelerating Docker builds for container-based developmentnot Okteto
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster infrastructurenot Okteto
- Distributing cache across Monorepo buildsnot Okteto
- Debugging failed CI builds interactively with SSHnot Okteto
Okteto
- A microservices estate where no developer can run the full dependency graph on a laptopnot Depot
- Giving each pull request a working environment reviewers can click rather than describenot Depot
- Letting coding agents build and test against real databases and queues instead of mocksnot Depot
- Removing a fleet of local Kubernetes installations that drift from production and produce false test resultsnot Depot
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Depot
- Developer plan minute limits may be insufficient for active development
- Startup plan at $200/mo is expensive for smaller teams
- Business plan requires custom pricing consultation
- macOS M2 runners not available on Developer plan
Okteto
- Two of the three plans publish no price at all, with no currency and no billing period stated anywhere, so any budget above five seats requires a sales conversation before you can even compare it with an alternative.
- The Apache-2.0 CLI is restricted to the development section of the manifest, so build services, user management and observability all require the commercial platform and the open licence provides very little continuity insurance.
- The last disclosed funding round is a 15 million US dollar Series A from February 2022 with nothing announced since, and the contributor base is dominated by company employees, which is concentrated risk for something embedded in every developer daily loop.
- You must bring and pay for the Kubernetes cluster, so node cost, capacity planning and version upgrades stay with your platform team on top of the licence fee.
- The 2026 repositioning towards AI agents means the classic developer inner loop is no longer what the marketing leads with, so a buyer purchasing that use case should confirm roadmap commitment rather than assume it.
Pricing, plan by plan
Depot
Free- Developer$20/month
- 1 user
- 500 Docker build minutes per month
- 2,000 Depot CI minutes per month
- Startup$200/month
- Unlimited users
- 5,000 Docker build minutes per month
- 20,000 Depot CI minutes per month
- Business$undefined/custom
- Custom pricing
- Unlimited users
- Custom monthly compute
Okteto
Free- StarterFree
- 5 seats included
- Self-hosted deployment into your own cluster
- Community support
- Scale$undefined/year
- Contact sales, no price, currency or billing period published
- More seats and environments than Starter
- Self-hosted deployment
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Contact sales, no price published
- Bring your own cloud deployment
- Available through Google Cloud and AWS marketplaces
Which should you pick?
Choose Depot if
- You need depot ci.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, GitHub, CLI.
- You also want container builds.
Choose Okteto if
- You need cluster development environments.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, CLI, Kubernetes, Web.
- You also want file synchronisation.
Questions people ask
- Is Depot or Okteto better?
- Neither clearly leads. Depot starts at Free and Okteto at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Depot or Okteto?
- Depot starts at Free and Okteto at Free.
- Does Depot or Okteto run on more platforms?
- Depot runs on Cloud, GitHub, CLI. Okteto runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, CLI, Kubernetes, Web.
- Can I use Depot for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Depot best used for?
- Depot is most often used for accelerating docker builds for container-based development, replacing github actions runners with faster infrastructure, distributing cache across monorepo builds, debugging failed ci builds interactively with ssh. Of those, accelerating docker builds for container-based development and replacing github actions runners with faster infrastructure are not what Okteto is typically brought in for.
- What can Depot do that Okteto cannot?
- Depot covers Depot CI, Container builds, GitHub Actions runners, Distributed caching. Okteto covers Cluster development environments, File synchronisation, Development containers, Environment catalogue.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Depot: How much faster are Depot runners compared to GitHub Actions?
Depot runners offer 30% faster CPUs and 10x faster networking than standard GitHub-hosted runners, enabling builds to complete significantly faster.
SourceOkteto: Is Okteto open source?
The CLI is Apache-2.0, but the README states it supports only the development section of the manifest. Everything operationally interesting, including builds, user management and observability, is in the commercial platform.
Depot: What is included in the Developer plan?
Developer plan ($20/month) includes 500 Docker build minutes, 2,000 Depot CI minutes, 2,000 GitHub Actions minutes, 25 GB storage, unlimited concurrency, and community support.
SourceOkteto: What does it cost?
Only the free Starter tier with five seats is published. Scale and Enterprise are both contact sales, with no price, currency or billing period disclosed on the pricing page.
Depot: Can I use Depot with my own AWS account?
Yes, Depot Managed allows deployment within customer AWS accounts. This is available to interested customers; contact sales for details.
SourceOkteto: Do I need my own Kubernetes cluster?
Yes. Okteto installs into a cluster you provide and pay for, so capacity, upgrades and node costs remain your responsibility in addition to the licence.
Okteto: How is this different from running Kubernetes locally?
Environments run against the same managed databases, queues and service mesh as production, so a class of failures that only appears in a real cluster is caught before merge rather than after deploy.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Depot vs WarpBuild
- Depot vs Blacksmith
- Depot vs Nixpacks
- Depot vs Buildkite
- Depot vs GitLab CI/CD
- Depot vs Namespace
- Depot vs Earthly
- Depot vs Nx Cloud
- Depot vs Dagger
- Depot vs Garden
- Depot vs Ansible
- Depot vs ConfigCat
- Depot vs Backstage
- Depot vs Bitbucket
- Depot vs Claude Code
- Depot vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Depot vs Cody
- Depot vs Tilt
- Depot vs Argo CD
- Depot vs Atlantis
- Depot vs Nix
- Depot vs Spacelift
- Depot vs Restate
- Depot vs Helm
- Depot vs StackBlitz
- Depot vs Avo
- Depot vs PhpStorm
- Depot vs Pieces for Developers
- Depot vs RAD Studio
- Depot vs Refact
- Depot vs RubyMine
- Okteto vs WarpBuild
- Okteto vs Blacksmith
- Okteto vs Nixpacks
- Okteto vs Buildkite
- Okteto vs GitLab CI/CD
- Okteto vs Namespace
- Okteto vs Earthly
- Okteto vs Nx Cloud
- Okteto vs Dagger
- Okteto vs Garden
- Okteto vs Ansible
- Okteto vs ConfigCat
- Okteto vs Backstage
- Okteto vs Bitbucket
- Okteto vs Claude Code
- Okteto vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Okteto vs Cody
- Okteto vs Tilt
- Okteto vs Argo CD
- Okteto vs Atlantis
- Okteto vs Nix
- Okteto vs Spacelift
- Okteto vs Restate
- Okteto vs Helm
- Okteto vs StackBlitz
- Okteto vs Avo
- Okteto vs PhpStorm
- Okteto vs Pieces for Developers
- Okteto vs RAD Studio
- Okteto vs Refact
- Okteto vs RubyMine
