Developer Tools · head to head
Depot vs Spacelift

Depot
Developer Tools
Cloud-based builds and CI runs 55x faster with less cost
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Spacelift
Developer Tools
Infrastructure-as-code orchestration for Terraform, OpenTofu, Pulumi and Kubernetes
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Depot developer plan minute limits may be insufficient for active development; Spacelift users are unlimited and private workers are metered, so deployment concurrency rather than headcount drives the bill, which inverts how most engineering budgets are built and is easy to under-forecast.
- They diverge on capability: Depot covers Depot CI, Spacelift covers Multi-tool orchestration.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Depot and Spacelift actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Developer Tools).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Depot
- Depot CI
- Container builds
- GitHub Actions runners
- Distributed caching
- Build API
- Depot Registry
- Cross-platform builds
- SSH debugging
Only in Spacelift
- Multi-tool orchestration
- Policy as code
- Private workers
- Spaces
- Blueprints
- Drift detection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Depot
- Accelerating Docker builds for container-based developmentnot Spacelift
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster infrastructurenot Spacelift
- Distributing cache across Monorepo buildsnot Spacelift
- Debugging failed CI builds interactively with SSHnot Spacelift
Spacelift
- Platform teams running infrastructure changes through approval gates rather than through application CInot Depot
- Organisations standardising Terraform and OpenTofu across many teams with policy enforcementnot Depot
- Estates needing private runners so cloud credentials never leave the networknot Depot
- Teams wanting drift detection and reconciliation rather than plan-time checks alonenot Depot
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Depot
- Developer plan minute limits may be insufficient for active development
- Startup plan at $200/mo is expensive for smaller teams
- Business plan requires custom pricing consultation
- macOS M2 runners not available on Developer plan
Spacelift
- Users are unlimited and private workers are metered, so deployment concurrency rather than headcount drives the bill, which inverts how most engineering budgets are built and is easy to under-forecast.
- There is no affordable paid entry point. The free tier stops at two users and the next tier is a five-figure commitment with nothing in between.
- Three of the five tiers are quote-only, so a shortlist cannot be costed without entering a sales process with each vendor on it.
- The self-hosted build lags the hosted one, has no public worker pool and lacks the Azure and Google Cloud integrations available in the SaaS product, with OIDC federation offered as the workaround.
- Stacks, Rego policies, Blueprints, Spaces and Spacelift-managed state are proprietary constructs, so leaving means rebuilding the orchestration layer rather than pointing it at a different runner.
Pricing, plan by plan
Depot
Free- Developer$20/month
- 1 user
- 500 Docker build minutes per month
- 2,000 Depot CI minutes per month
- Startup$200/month
- Unlimited users
- 5,000 Docker build minutes per month
- 20,000 Depot CI minutes per month
- Business$undefined/custom
- Custom pricing
- Unlimited users
- Custom monthly compute
Spacelift
Free- FreeFree
- Two users
- Public workers only
- No private workers
- Starter Plus$undefined/year
- Unlimited users
- Two public workers
- One to two private workers
- Business$undefined/year
- Unlimited users
- Three private workers
- Quoted
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Unlimited users
- Five to thirty private workers
- Self-hosted option
Which should you pick?
Choose Depot if
- You need depot ci.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, GitHub, CLI.
- You also want container builds.
Choose Spacelift if
- You need multi-tool orchestration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Self-hosted, Cloud.
- You also want policy as code.
Questions people ask
- Is Depot or Spacelift better?
- Neither clearly leads. Depot starts at Free and Spacelift at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Depot or Spacelift?
- Depot starts at Free and Spacelift at Free.
- Does Depot or Spacelift run on more platforms?
- Depot runs on Cloud, GitHub, CLI. Spacelift runs on Web, Self-hosted, Cloud.
- Can I use Depot for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Depot best used for?
- Depot is most often used for accelerating docker builds for container-based development, replacing github actions runners with faster infrastructure, distributing cache across monorepo builds, debugging failed ci builds interactively with ssh. Of those, accelerating docker builds for container-based development and replacing github actions runners with faster infrastructure are not what Spacelift is typically brought in for.
- What can Depot do that Spacelift cannot?
- Depot covers Depot CI, Container builds, GitHub Actions runners, Distributed caching. Spacelift covers Multi-tool orchestration, Policy as code, Private workers, Spaces.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Depot: How much faster are Depot runners compared to GitHub Actions?
Depot runners offer 30% faster CPUs and 10x faster networking than standard GitHub-hosted runners, enabling builds to complete significantly faster.
SourceSpacelift: How is Spacelift priced?
By tier and by private worker count rather than per user. Users are unlimited on every paid plan. The published figure on the pricing page carries no period label, and the FAQ describes the tier as an annual subscription, so confirm the period in writing.
Depot: What is included in the Developer plan?
Developer plan ($20/month) includes 500 Docker build minutes, 2,000 Depot CI minutes, 2,000 GitHub Actions minutes, 25 GB storage, unlimited concurrency, and community support.
SourceSpacelift: Does it support OpenTofu?
Yes, and Spacelift sponsors the OpenTofu project, which is a substantive hedge for anyone avoiding Terraform under the Business Source Licence.
Depot: Can I use Depot with my own AWS account?
Yes, Depot Managed allows deployment within customer AWS accounts. This is available to interested customers; contact sales for details.
SourceSpacelift: Is there a self-hosted version?
Yes, described as carrying Enterprise functionality, but it is priced on request and lags the hosted product on cloud integrations.
Spacelift: Why not just use the CI system we already have?
That is the real comparison. General purpose CI handles state, drift, approval gates and concurrency control for infrastructure poorly, and whether that is worth a five-figure floor depends on how much infrastructure change your organisation actually ships.
Spacelift: What happens to our pipelines if we leave?
They do not port. Rego policies, Blueprints, Spaces and managed state are Spacelift constructs and the orchestration has to be rebuilt elsewhere.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Depot vs WarpBuild
- Depot vs Blacksmith
- Depot vs Nixpacks
- Depot vs Buildkite
- Depot vs GitLab CI/CD
- Depot vs Namespace
- Depot vs Earthly
- Depot vs Nx Cloud
- Depot vs Dagger
- Depot vs Garden
- Depot vs Ansible
- Depot vs ConfigCat
- Depot vs Backstage
- Depot vs Bitbucket
- Depot vs Claude Code
- Depot vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Depot vs Cody
- Depot vs Atlantis
- Depot vs Harness
- Depot vs Cortex
- Depot vs OpsLevel
- Depot vs Okteto
- Depot vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Depot vs HCP Terraform
- Depot vs Azure DevOps
- Depot vs Frappe
- Depot vs Deno
- Depot vs Fig
- Depot vs Git
- Depot vs GoLand
- Spacelift vs WarpBuild
- Spacelift vs Blacksmith
- Spacelift vs Nixpacks
- Spacelift vs Buildkite
- Spacelift vs GitLab CI/CD
- Spacelift vs Namespace
- Spacelift vs Earthly
- Spacelift vs Nx Cloud
- Spacelift vs Dagger
- Spacelift vs Garden
- Spacelift vs Ansible
- Spacelift vs ConfigCat
- Spacelift vs Backstage
- Spacelift vs Bitbucket
- Spacelift vs Claude Code
- Spacelift vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Spacelift vs Cody
- Spacelift vs Atlantis
- Spacelift vs Harness
- Spacelift vs Cortex
- Spacelift vs OpsLevel
- Spacelift vs Okteto
- Spacelift vs Ona (formerly Gitpod)
- Spacelift vs HCP Terraform
- Spacelift vs Azure DevOps
- Spacelift vs Frappe
- Spacelift vs Deno
- Spacelift vs Fig
- Spacelift vs Git
- Spacelift vs GoLand
