Developer Tools · head to head
Depot vs Refact

Depot
Developer Tools
Cloud-based builds and CI runs 55x faster with less cost
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Refact
Developer Tools
Autonomous AI coding agent for development tasks
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Depot developer plan minute limits may be insufficient for active development; Refact requires configuration for optimal performance
- They diverge on capability: Depot covers Depot CI, Refact covers Autonomous agent workflows.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Depot and Refact actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Developer Tools).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Depot
- Depot CI
- Container builds
- GitHub Actions runners
- Distributed caching
- Build API
- Depot Registry
- Cross-platform builds
- SSH debugging
Only in Refact
- Autonomous agent workflows
- IDE chat
- Real-time code completions
- GitHub integration
- Database integration
- On-premise deployment
- Multi-LLM support
- 25+ language support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Depot
- Accelerating Docker builds for container-based developmentnot Refact
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster infrastructurenot Refact
- Distributing cache across Monorepo buildsnot Refact
- Debugging failed CI builds interactively with SSHnot Refact
Refact
- Autonomous code generation for development tasksnot Depot
- End-to-end bug fixes and refactoringnot Depot
- Multi-language software development accelerationnot Depot
- Enterprise development with data privacy requirementsnot Depot
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Depot
- Developer plan minute limits may be insufficient for active development
- Startup plan at $200/mo is expensive for smaller teams
- Business plan requires custom pricing consultation
- macOS M2 runners not available on Developer plan
Refact
- Requires configuration for optimal performance
- On-premise deployment adds operational complexity
- Free tier limited by daily agent request quota
- Coin system adds complexity to cost calculation
Pricing, plan by plan
Depot
Free- Developer$20/month
- 1 user
- 500 Docker build minutes per month
- 2,000 Depot CI minutes per month
- Startup$200/month
- Unlimited users
- 5,000 Docker build minutes per month
- 20,000 Depot CI minutes per month
- Business$undefined/custom
- Custom pricing
- Unlimited users
- Custom monthly compute
Refact
Free- FreeFree
- Limited daily agent usage
- Unlimited completions
- 2,000 coins for agent and chat
- Pro$10/month
- 40 daily agent requests
- 64k context window
- 10,000 coins monthly
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- On-premise deployment
- Custom coin allocation
- Fine-tuning support
Which should you pick?
Choose Depot if
- You need depot ci.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, GitHub, CLI.
- You also want container builds.
Choose Refact if
- You need autonomous agent workflows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on VS Code, Web.
- You also want ide chat.
Questions people ask
- Is Depot or Refact better?
- Neither clearly leads. Depot starts at Free and Refact at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Depot or Refact?
- Depot starts at Free and Refact at Free.
- Does Depot or Refact run on more platforms?
- Depot runs on Cloud, GitHub, CLI. Refact runs on VS Code, Web.
- Can I use Depot for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Depot best used for?
- Depot is most often used for accelerating docker builds for container-based development, replacing github actions runners with faster infrastructure, distributing cache across monorepo builds, debugging failed ci builds interactively with ssh. Of those, accelerating docker builds for container-based development and replacing github actions runners with faster infrastructure are not what Refact is typically brought in for.
- What can Depot do that Refact cannot?
- Depot covers Depot CI, Container builds, GitHub Actions runners, Distributed caching. Refact covers Autonomous agent workflows, IDE chat, Real-time code completions, GitHub integration.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Depot: How much faster are Depot runners compared to GitHub Actions?
Depot runners offer 30% faster CPUs and 10x faster networking than standard GitHub-hosted runners, enabling builds to complete significantly faster.
SourceRefact: How many programming languages does Refact support?
Refact supports 25+ programming languages including Python, JavaScript, Go, Rust, Java, C++, and many others.
SourceDepot: What is included in the Developer plan?
Developer plan ($20/month) includes 500 Docker build minutes, 2,000 Depot CI minutes, 2,000 GitHub Actions minutes, 25 GB storage, unlimited concurrency, and community support.
SourceRefact: Can I deploy Refact on-premises?
Yes. Refact offers on-premise deployment options for organizations requiring complete data control and privacy.
SourceDepot: Can I use Depot with my own AWS account?
Yes, Depot Managed allows deployment within customer AWS accounts. This is available to interested customers; contact sales for details.
SourceRefact: What LLMs does Refact support?
Refact works with multiple LLMs including Claude, GPT-4, and open-source models, giving you flexibility in model selection.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Depot vs Visual Studio Code
- Depot vs ESLint
- Depot vs pnpm
- Depot vs Turborepo
- Depot vs GitHub Copilot
- Depot vs Penpot
- Depot vs Keycloak
- Depot vs Rust
- Depot vs CLion
- Depot vs GNAT Pro
- Depot vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Depot vs GNU Emacs
- Depot vs Keil MDK
- Depot vs Vite
- Depot vs Bazel
- Depot vs CodeSandbox
- Depot vs Eclipse IDE
- Depot vs Moonrepo
- Refact vs Visual Studio Code
- Refact vs ESLint
- Refact vs pnpm
- Refact vs Turborepo
- Refact vs GitHub Copilot
- Refact vs Penpot
- Refact vs Keycloak
- Refact vs Rust
- Refact vs CLion
- Refact vs GNAT Pro
- Refact vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Refact vs GNU Emacs
- Refact vs Keil MDK
- Refact vs Vite
- Refact vs Bazel
- Refact vs CodeSandbox
- Refact vs Eclipse IDE
- Refact vs Moonrepo
