Developer Tools · head to head
Helm vs Okteto

Okteto
Developer Tools
Runs production-like development environments on your own Kubernetes cluster
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Helm licensed under Apache License 2.0 per the project's GitHub repository (helm/helm LICENSE); as open source software it has no paid tier or vendor price to compare; Okteto two of the three plans publish no price at all, with no currency and no billing period stated anywhere, so any budget above five seats requires a sales conversation before you can even compare it with an alternative.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Helm and Okteto actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Developer Tools).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Helm
Nothing recorded that Okteto does not also cover.
Only in Okteto
- Cluster development environments
- File synchronisation
- Development containers
- Environment catalogue
- Preview environments
- Bring your own cloud
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Helm
- Kubernetes package manager and deployment toolnot Okteto
Okteto
- A microservices estate where no developer can run the full dependency graph on a laptopnot Helm
- Giving each pull request a working environment reviewers can click rather than describenot Helm
- Letting coding agents build and test against real databases and queues instead of mocksnot Helm
- Removing a fleet of local Kubernetes installations that drift from production and produce false test resultsnot Helm
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Helm
- Licensed under Apache License 2.0 per the project's GitHub repository (helm/helm LICENSE); as open source software it has no paid tier or vendor price to compare
- Contributors must sign commits under the Developer Certificate of Origin to have them accepted, per helm.sh, a process requirement not all Kubernetes tools impose
Okteto
- Two of the three plans publish no price at all, with no currency and no billing period stated anywhere, so any budget above five seats requires a sales conversation before you can even compare it with an alternative.
- The Apache-2.0 CLI is restricted to the development section of the manifest, so build services, user management and observability all require the commercial platform and the open licence provides very little continuity insurance.
- The last disclosed funding round is a 15 million US dollar Series A from February 2022 with nothing announced since, and the contributor base is dominated by company employees, which is concentrated risk for something embedded in every developer daily loop.
- You must bring and pay for the Kubernetes cluster, so node cost, capacity planning and version upgrades stay with your platform team on top of the licence fee.
- The 2026 repositioning towards AI agents means the classic developer inner loop is no longer what the marketing leads with, so a buyer purchasing that use case should confirm roadmap commitment rather than assume it.
Pricing, plan by plan
Helm
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Helm review.
Okteto
Free- StarterFree
- 5 seats included
- Self-hosted deployment into your own cluster
- Community support
- Scale$undefined/year
- Contact sales, no price, currency or billing period published
- More seats and environments than Starter
- Self-hosted deployment
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Contact sales, no price published
- Bring your own cloud deployment
- Available through Google Cloud and AWS marketplaces
Which should you pick?
Choose Okteto if
- You need cluster development environments.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, CLI, Kubernetes, Web.
- You also want file synchronisation.
Questions people ask
- Is Helm or Okteto better?
- Neither clearly leads. Helm starts at Free and Okteto at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Helm or Okteto?
- Helm starts at Free and Okteto at Free.
- Does Helm or Okteto run on more platforms?
- Helm runs on Web. Okteto runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, CLI, Kubernetes, Web.
- Can I use Helm for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Helm best used for?
- Helm is most often used for kubernetes package manager and deployment tool. Of those, kubernetes package manager and deployment tool is not what Okteto is typically brought in for.
- What can Helm do that Okteto cannot?
- Okteto covers Cluster development environments, File synchronisation, Development containers, Environment catalogue.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Helm: How much does Helm cost?
Helm is free and open-source. It is a graduated project in the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF) with no commercial pricing model.
SourceOkteto: Is Okteto open source?
The CLI is Apache-2.0, but the README states it supports only the development section of the manifest. Everything operationally interesting, including builds, user management and observability, is in the commercial platform.
Okteto: What does it cost?
Only the free Starter tier with five seats is published. Scale and Enterprise are both contact sales, with no price, currency or billing period disclosed on the pricing page.
Okteto: Do I need my own Kubernetes cluster?
Yes. Okteto installs into a cluster you provide and pay for, so capacity, upgrades and node costs remain your responsibility in addition to the licence.
Okteto: How is this different from running Kubernetes locally?
Environments run against the same managed databases, queues and service mesh as production, so a class of failures that only appears in a real cluster is caught before merge rather than after deploy.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Helm vs pnpm
- Helm vs Visual Studio Code
- Helm vs ESLint
- Helm vs Turborepo
- Helm vs Argo CD
- Helm vs Yarn
- Helm vs Nix
- Helm vs Moonrepo
- Helm vs Nx Cloud
- Helm vs Pants Build
- Helm vs Buildkite
- Helm vs Atlantis
- Helm vs Blacksmith
- Helm vs Coder
- Helm vs Garden
- Helm vs GitLab CI/CD
- Helm vs HCP Terraform
- Helm vs Tilt
- Helm vs Spacelift
- Helm vs ConfigCat
- Helm vs Restate
- Helm vs StackBlitz
- Helm vs Avo
- Helm vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Helm vs PhpStorm
- Helm vs Pieces for Developers
- Helm vs RAD Studio
- Helm vs Refact
- Helm vs RubyMine
- Okteto vs pnpm
- Okteto vs Visual Studio Code
- Okteto vs ESLint
- Okteto vs Turborepo
- Okteto vs Argo CD
- Okteto vs Yarn
- Okteto vs Nix
- Okteto vs Moonrepo
- Okteto vs Nx Cloud
- Okteto vs Pants Build
- Okteto vs Buildkite
- Okteto vs Atlantis
- Okteto vs Blacksmith
- Okteto vs Coder
- Okteto vs Garden
- Okteto vs GitLab CI/CD
- Okteto vs HCP Terraform
- Okteto vs Tilt
- Okteto vs Spacelift
- Okteto vs ConfigCat
- Okteto vs Restate
- Okteto vs StackBlitz
- Okteto vs Avo
- Okteto vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Okteto vs PhpStorm
- Okteto vs Pieces for Developers
- Okteto vs RAD Studio
- Okteto vs Refact
- Okteto vs RubyMine
