Cybersecurity · head to head
DataGrail vs Entrust Identity as a Service

DataGrail
Cybersecurity
Privacy platform that finds shadow data systems and automates data subject requests across them
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Entrust Identity as a Service
Cybersecurity
Workforce and customer authentication from a certificate authority
- From
- $2/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: DataGrail no pricing is published, and while benchmarking suggests it undercuts OneTrust for comparable scope, cost still scales with request volume and connected systems, which grow with the business.; Entrust Identity as a Service the application integration catalogue is smaller than that of the dedicated identity vendors, so uncommon SaaS applications more often need custom SAML configuration rather than a template.
- They diverge on capability: DataGrail covers Live data discovery, Entrust Identity as a Service covers Multi-factor authentication.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which DataGrail and Entrust Identity as a Service actually diverge.
| Attribute | DataGrail | Entrust Identity as a Service |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $2/month |
| Pricing model | quote | Per user per month |
| Platforms | Web, API | Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in DataGrail
- Live data discovery
- Request automation
- Audit trail
- Consent management
- Integration catalogue
- Risk monitoring
- Consumer request portal
- Reporting
Only in Entrust Identity as a Service
- Multi-factor authentication
- Single sign-on
- Adaptive authentication
- Passwordless login
- Credential lifecycle
- Derived PIV credentials
- Directory integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
DataGrail
- A consumer brand whose deletion requests keep missing data in marketing tools the privacy team did not know existednot Entrust Identity as a Service
- A company processing hundreds of CCPA requests a month where manual fulfilment has become a full-time jobnot Entrust Identity as a Service
- A privacy team leaving OneTrust because the platform tracked requests but staff still completed them by handnot Entrust Identity as a Service
- An organisation needing evidence for a regulator that deletion actually occurred in every system, not that a ticket was closednot Entrust Identity as a Service
Entrust Identity as a Service
- A government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing PIV smart card estatenot DataGrail
- A bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staffnot DataGrail
- An organisation already buying Entrust certificates that wants credential issuance and authentication from one vendornot DataGrail
- A defence supplier required to use certificate-based authentication that mainstream cloud identity products handle poorlynot DataGrail
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
DataGrail
- No pricing is published, and while benchmarking suggests it undercuts OneTrust for comparable scope, cost still scales with request volume and connected systems, which grow with the business.
- Automated fulfilment only works for systems with a supported connector, so homegrown applications and legacy databases still need manual handling, and those are usually where the awkward data lives.
- Discovery works by observing integrations and traffic patterns, so genuinely isolated systems, offline data and files on employee machines remain invisible and outside the data map.
- It is narrower than the enterprise privacy suites, lacking the assessment, third-party risk and wider GRC modules a large regulated organisation will also need, so it may be one of two platforms rather than the only one.
- Deletion automation is irreversible and mistakes are unrecoverable, so teams need real confidence in identity verification before enabling it, and that caution often keeps deletion semi-manual for months after purchase.
Entrust Identity as a Service
- The application integration catalogue is smaller than that of the dedicated identity vendors, so uncommon SaaS applications more often need custom SAML configuration rather than a template.
- Developer experience for customer identity use cases is behind the specialists, and teams building consumer signup flows will find the APIs and documentation less complete.
- Advanced capabilities including adaptive authentication and credential management sit above the published entry price, so the two dollar figure rarely reflects what a regulated buyer actually spends.
- There are two overlapping products, Identity as a Service and Identity Enterprise, and choosing wrongly at the start means a migration later rather than a licence change.
- Identity governance, access certification and privileged access are not covered, so an organisation with audit-driven access review requirements needs a second vendor alongside it.
Pricing, plan by plan
DataGrail
On request- DataGrail Platform$undefined/year
- Data discovery and mapping
- Data subject request automation
- Consent management
Entrust Identity as a Service
$2/month- Workforce Standard$2/month
- Multi-factor authentication
- Single sign-on
- Directory integration
- Higher tiers$undefined/month
- Adaptive risk-based authentication
- Certificate and smart card credential management
- Derived PIV credentials
Which should you pick?
Choose DataGrail if
- You need live data discovery.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want request automation.
Choose Entrust Identity as a Service if
- You need multi-factor authentication.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux.
- You also want single sign-on.
Questions people ask
- Is DataGrail or Entrust Identity as a Service better?
- Neither clearly leads. DataGrail starts at On request and Entrust Identity as a Service at $2/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, DataGrail or Entrust Identity as a Service?
- DataGrail starts at On request and Entrust Identity as a Service at $2/month.
- Does DataGrail or Entrust Identity as a Service run on more platforms?
- DataGrail runs on Web, API. Entrust Identity as a Service runs on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux.
- What is DataGrail best used for?
- DataGrail is most often used for a consumer brand whose deletion requests keep missing data in marketing tools the privacy team did not know existed, a company processing hundreds of ccpa requests a month where manual fulfilment has become a full-time job, a privacy team leaving onetrust because the platform tracked requests but staff still completed them by hand, an organisation needing evidence for a regulator that deletion actually occurred in every system, not that a ticket was closed. Of those, a consumer brand whose deletion requests keep missing data in marketing tools the privacy team did not know existed and a company processing hundreds of ccpa requests a month where manual fulfilment has become a full-time job are not what Entrust Identity as a Service is typically brought in for.
- What can DataGrail do that Entrust Identity as a Service cannot?
- DataGrail covers Live data discovery, Request automation, Audit trail, Consent management. Entrust Identity as a Service covers Multi-factor authentication, Single sign-on, Adaptive authentication, Passwordless login.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
DataGrail: How is DataGrail different from OneTrust?
OneTrust orchestrates the workflow; DataGrail focuses on connecting to systems and completing the request, and benchmark data suggests it prices materially below OneTrust for comparable scope.
Entrust Identity as a Service: Is MFA included or extra?
Multi-factor authentication is included in the workforce bundles rather than sold separately, which is not true of every competitor. Adaptive risk-based authentication sits in higher tiers.
DataGrail: Does it find systems we do not know about?
Yes. Continuous discovery of unsanctioned tools processing personal data is its main technical claim.
Entrust Identity as a Service: Does it do identity governance?
No. Access certification, role mining and joiner-mover-leaver governance require a separate product such as SailPoint or Saviynt.
DataGrail: What does it cost?
Not published. Pricing is quoted by request volume and connected systems, with multi-year commitments typically discounted.
Entrust Identity as a Service: Why choose this over Okta or Entra ID?
Almost always because of PKI, smart cards or derived credentials. Without that requirement the mainstream platforms are the stronger general purpose choice.
DataGrail: Does it cover consent as well as requests?
Yes, it includes consent management, though publishers needing certified advertising consent usually use a specialist CMP.
Related pages
More on Entrust Identity as a Service
Other head to heads
- DataGrail vs OneTrust
- DataGrail vs Transcend
- DataGrail vs TrustArc
- DataGrail vs Osano
- DataGrail vs BigID
- DataGrail vs Securiti
- DataGrail vs Termly
- DataGrail vs Mullvad VPN
- DataGrail vs Avast One
- DataGrail vs CyberGhost VPN
- DataGrail vs IVPN
- DataGrail vs ProtonVPN
- DataGrail vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- DataGrail vs Netwrix
- DataGrail vs NordVPN
- DataGrail vs Omada Identity
- DataGrail vs Ory
- DataGrail vs Microsoft Intune
- DataGrail vs Cisco Duo
- DataGrail vs JumpCloud
- DataGrail vs Ping Identity
- DataGrail vs Frontegg
- DataGrail vs Authelia
- DataGrail vs Beyond Identity
- DataGrail vs Transmit Security
- DataGrail vs Akeyless
- DataGrail vs authentik
- DataGrail vs Logto
- DataGrail vs Speakeasy
- DataGrail vs Authy
- DataGrail vs ExpressVPN
- DataGrail vs Falco
- DataGrail vs Fenergo
- DataGrail vs Google Authenticator
- DataGrail vs Grype
- DataGrail vs Hanwha Vision
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs OneTrust
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Transcend
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs TrustArc
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Osano
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs BigID
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Securiti
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Termly
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Mullvad VPN
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Avast One
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs CyberGhost VPN
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs IVPN
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs ProtonVPN
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Netwrix
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs NordVPN
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Omada Identity
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Ory
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Microsoft Intune
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Cisco Duo
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs JumpCloud
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Ping Identity
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Frontegg
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Authelia
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Beyond Identity
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Transmit Security
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Akeyless
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs authentik
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Logto
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Speakeasy
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Authy
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs ExpressVPN
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Falco
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Fenergo
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Google Authenticator
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Grype
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Hanwha Vision
