Testing · head to head
Cucumber vs Kong

Cucumber
Testing
Behaviour-driven development testing framework that returned to community ownership after nine years under SmartBear
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cucumber gherkin's plain-language layer adds a real maintenance burden, keeping feature files, step definitions and implementation code synchronised across a large suite is a known source of drift and duplicated effort.; Kong the Plus plan includes 1M API requests a month and charges $200 a month for each additional million
- They diverge on capability: Cucumber covers Gherkin syntax, Kong covers API Gateway.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cucumber and Kong actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cucumber
- Gherkin syntax
- Step definition binding
- Multi-language support
- Living documentation
- Tagging and scenario outlines
- Reporting plugins
Only in Kong
- API Gateway
- Authentication & Authorization
- Rate Limiting
- Kubernetes
- Consul
- Eureka
- PostgreSQL
- Linux support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cucumber
- A team practising behaviour-driven development that wants shared, readable specifications between product owners and engineersnot Kong
- An organisation wanting living documentation that stays synchronised with actual test coverage rather than a separate specification documentnot Kong
- A QA team migrating acceptance tests from a proprietary BDD tool to an open source, community-governed alternativenot Kong
- A Java, JavaScript or Ruby project needing a mature BDD framework rather than building Gherkin-style parsing from scratchnot Kong
Kong
- API gateway management and routingnot Cucumber
- API development and testingnot Cucumber
- Enterprise API security and governancenot Cucumber
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cucumber
- Gherkin's plain-language layer adds a real maintenance burden, keeping feature files, step definitions and implementation code synchronised across a large suite is a known source of drift and duplicated effort.
- Ownership has moved twice in under a decade, from independent to SmartBear-owned to independent community ownership again, which should temper confidence in any specific long-range roadmap claim.
- Non-technical stakeholders who are meant to read and write Gherkin scenarios often do not engage with them in practice, leaving the readability benefit unrealised while the maintenance cost remains.
- Step definition reuse across a large feature file set can become tangled, with ambiguous step matching causing hard-to-debug failures as a suite grows.
- As a community-owned project without a corporate backer's support infrastructure, enterprise buyers wanting a formal support contract have no vendor to buy one from, unlike some competing BDD tools still sold commercially.
Kong
- The Plus plan includes 1M API requests a month and charges $200 a month for each additional million
- Plus is capped at 10M requests a month, so growth past that forces an Enterprise contract
- Plus limits published APIs to 20 and includes one Developer Portal, with a second at $200 a month
- SSO and audit logging are Enterprise only
- Enterprise pricing is custom and billed annually
Pricing, plan by plan
Cucumber
Free- CucumberFree
- Full functionality across Cucumber-JVM, Cucumber-JS, Cucumber-Ruby and other implementations
- Community support via GitHub
- Returned to independent community ownership in December 2024 after nine years connected to SmartBear
Kong
Free- Kong Konnect Free TrialFree
- 30-day free trial
- Full enterprise functionality
- Unlimited gateways
- Kong Konnect Plus$null/month
- Per gateway pricing billed monthly
- Up to 5 Serverless Gateways, 2 Hybrid, 2 Dedicated Cloud Gateways
- 1M API requests included per month
- Kong Insomnia EssentialsFree
- Unlimited projects and CLI access
- Up to 3 Git Sync users
- 1,000 mock server requests per month
- Kong Insomnia Pro$12/month
- Unlimited users with Git Sync access
- Unlimited organizations
- RBAC
Which should you pick?
Choose Cucumber if
- You need gherkin syntax.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- You also want step definition binding.
Choose Kong if
- You need api gateway.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want authentication & authorization.
Questions people ask
- Is Cucumber or Kong better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cucumber starts at Free and Kong at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cucumber or Kong?
- Cucumber starts at Free and Kong at Free.
- Does Cucumber or Kong run on more platforms?
- Cucumber runs on Linux, macOS, Windows. Kong runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Cucumber for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cucumber best used for?
- Cucumber is most often used for a team practising behaviour-driven development that wants shared, readable specifications between product owners and engineers, an organisation wanting living documentation that stays synchronised with actual test coverage rather than a separate specification document, a qa team migrating acceptance tests from a proprietary bdd tool to an open source, community-governed alternative, a java, javascript or ruby project needing a mature bdd framework rather than building gherkin-style parsing from scratch. Of those, a team practising behaviour-driven development that wants shared, readable specifications between product owners and engineers and an organisation wanting living documentation that stays synchronised with actual test coverage rather than a separate specification document are not what Kong is typically brought in for.
- What can Cucumber do that Kong cannot?
- Cucumber covers Gherkin syntax, Step definition binding, Multi-language support, Living documentation. Kong covers API Gateway, Authentication & Authorization, Rate Limiting, Kubernetes.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cucumber: Is Cucumber owned by SmartBear?
No, not currently. SmartBear acquired Cucumber Ltd in 2019 but the open source project returned to independent community ownership in December 2024.
Kong: Does Kong offer a free trial?
Yes, Kong Konnect offers a 30-day free trial with full enterprise functionality, unlimited gateways, and no credit card required.
SourceCucumber: Is Cucumber free?
Yes, entirely open source with no licence fee across all its language implementations.
Kong: How much does Kong Insomnia Pro cost?
Kong Insomnia Pro is $12 per user per month with 15% savings available for annual billing.
SourceCucumber: Does Cucumber replace Selenium or Appium?
No, Cucumber provides the Gherkin specification layer and step definition binding; the actual browser or mobile automation still needs a driver such as Selenium or Appium underneath.
Kong: What are Kong Konnect Plus API request limits?
Kong Konnect Plus includes 1M API requests per month; additional requests cost $200 per 1M (maximum 10M per month).
SourceKong: What is included in Kong Insomnia Enterprise?
Kong Insomnia Enterprise is $45 per user per month with SSO, SCIM, vault integrations, unlimited mock server requests, and Konnect integration.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Cucumber vs Robot Framework
- Cucumber vs Appium
- Cucumber vs Selenium
- Cucumber vs Xray Test Management
- Cucumber vs JUnit
- Cucumber vs TestNG
- Cucumber vs Applitools
- Cucumber vs Percy
- Cucumber vs Testsigma
- Cucumber vs Insomnia
- Cucumber vs Puppeteer
- Cucumber vs QA Wolf
- Cucumber vs Ranorex
- Cucumber vs Split
- Cucumber vs Tricentis Tosca
- Cucumber vs Jest
- Cucumber vs WebdriverIO
- Cucumber vs Convoy
- Cucumber vs PocketBase
- Cucumber vs Appwrite
- Cucumber vs Hasura
- Cucumber vs Sanity
- Cucumber vs Tyk
- Cucumber vs WSO2 API Manager
- Cucumber vs Gravitee
- Cucumber vs Janus Gateway
- Cucumber vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Cucumber vs 3scale
- Cucumber vs Akana
- Cucumber vs Enable Banking
- Cucumber vs Flybits
- Cucumber vs i2c
- Cucumber vs KeystoneJS
- Cucumber vs Liveblocks
- Cucumber vs Moesif
- Kong vs Robot Framework
- Kong vs Appium
- Kong vs Selenium
- Kong vs Xray Test Management
- Kong vs JUnit
- Kong vs TestNG
- Kong vs Applitools
- Kong vs Percy
- Kong vs Testsigma
- Kong vs Insomnia
- Kong vs Puppeteer
- Kong vs QA Wolf
- Kong vs Ranorex
- Kong vs Split
- Kong vs Tricentis Tosca
- Kong vs Jest
- Kong vs WebdriverIO
- Kong vs Convoy
- Kong vs PocketBase
- Kong vs Appwrite
- Kong vs Hasura
- Kong vs Sanity
- Kong vs Tyk
- Kong vs WSO2 API Manager
- Kong vs Gravitee
- Kong vs Janus Gateway
- Kong vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Kong vs 3scale
- Kong vs Akana
- Kong vs Enable Banking
- Kong vs Flybits
- Kong vs i2c
- Kong vs KeystoneJS
- Kong vs Liveblocks
- Kong vs Moesif

