APIs · head to head
Kong vs Puppeteer
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Kong the Plus plan includes 1M API requests a month and charges $200 a month for each additional million; Puppeteer chrome and Firefox only, with no Safari or WebKit story
- They diverge on capability: Kong covers API Gateway, Puppeteer covers DevTools Protocol.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Kong and Puppeteer actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Kong
- API Gateway
- Authentication & Authorization
- Rate Limiting
- Kubernetes
- Consul
- Eureka
- PostgreSQL
- Linux support
Only in Puppeteer
- DevTools Protocol
- Headless by default
- PDF and screenshots
- Network interception
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Kong
- API gateway management and routingnot Puppeteer
- API development and testingnot Puppeteer
- Enterprise API security and governancenot Puppeteer
Puppeteer
- Generating PDFs or screenshots of rendered pages on a servernot Kong
- Scraping sites that require JavaScript executionnot Kong
- Automating browser tasks where a full test framework is unnecessarynot Kong
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Kong
- The Plus plan includes 1M API requests a month and charges $200 a month for each additional million
- Plus is capped at 10M requests a month, so growth past that forces an Enterprise contract
- Plus limits published APIs to 20 and includes one Developer Portal, with a second at $200 a month
- SSO and audit logging are Enterprise only
- Enterprise pricing is custom and billed annually
Puppeteer
- Chrome and Firefox only, with no Safari or WebKit story
- Not a test framework: assertions, retries and reporting need Jest or similar bolted on
- Bundles a Chromium download, which makes installs large and awkward in constrained CI images
Pricing, plan by plan
Kong
Free- Kong Konnect Free TrialFree
- 30-day free trial
- Full enterprise functionality
- Unlimited gateways
- Kong Konnect Plus$null/month
- Per gateway pricing billed monthly
- Up to 5 Serverless Gateways, 2 Hybrid, 2 Dedicated Cloud Gateways
- 1M API requests included per month
- Kong Insomnia EssentialsFree
- Unlimited projects and CLI access
- Up to 3 Git Sync users
- 1,000 mock server requests per month
- Kong Insomnia Pro$12/month
- Unlimited users with Git Sync access
- Unlimited organizations
- RBAC
Puppeteer
Free- PuppeteerFree
- Full functionality
- Unlimited tests
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Kong if
- You need api gateway.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want authentication & authorization.
Choose Puppeteer if
- You need devtools protocol.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- You also want headless by default.
Questions people ask
- Is Kong or Puppeteer better?
- Neither clearly leads. Kong starts at Free and Puppeteer at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Kong or Puppeteer?
- Kong starts at Free and Puppeteer at Free.
- Does Kong or Puppeteer run on more platforms?
- Kong runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes. Puppeteer runs on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- Can I use Kong for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Kong best used for?
- Kong is most often used for api gateway management and routing, api development and testing, enterprise api security and governance. Of those, api gateway management and routing and api development and testing are not what Puppeteer is typically brought in for.
- What can Kong do that Puppeteer cannot?
- Kong covers API Gateway, Authentication & Authorization, Rate Limiting, Kubernetes. Puppeteer covers DevTools Protocol, Headless by default, PDF and screenshots, Network interception.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Kong: Does Kong offer a free trial?
Yes, Kong Konnect offers a 30-day free trial with full enterprise functionality, unlimited gateways, and no credit card required.
SourcePuppeteer: Is Puppeteer free?
Yes, open source from the Chrome team.
Kong: How much does Kong Insomnia Pro cost?
Kong Insomnia Pro is $12 per user per month with 15% savings available for annual billing.
SourcePuppeteer: Puppeteer or Playwright?
Playwright came from the same original team, adds WebKit and Firefox support, automatic waiting and a test runner. Puppeteer stays a focused Chrome automation library, which is simpler if automation rather than testing is the goal.
Kong: What are Kong Konnect Plus API request limits?
Kong Konnect Plus includes 1M API requests per month; additional requests cost $200 per 1M (maximum 10M per month).
SourcePuppeteer: Can Puppeteer generate PDFs?
Yes, and it is one of the most common uses — rendering a page and printing it to PDF server-side.
Kong: What is included in Kong Insomnia Enterprise?
Kong Insomnia Enterprise is $45 per user per month with SSO, SCIM, vault integrations, unlimited mock server requests, and Konnect integration.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Kong vs Convoy
- Kong vs PocketBase
- Kong vs Appwrite
- Kong vs Hasura
- Kong vs Sanity
- Kong vs Tyk
- Kong vs WSO2 API Manager
- Kong vs Gravitee
- Kong vs Janus Gateway
- Kong vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Kong vs 3scale
- Kong vs Akana
- Kong vs Enable Banking
- Kong vs Flybits
- Kong vs i2c
- Kong vs KeystoneJS
- Kong vs Liveblocks
- Kong vs Moesif
- Kong vs Selenium
- Kong vs Playwright
- Kong vs Appium
- Kong vs Qase
- Kong vs TestNG
- Kong vs Ranorex
- Kong vs BrowserStack
- Kong vs Cypress
- Kong vs CircleCI
- Kong vs Insomnia
- Kong vs BugHerd
- Kong vs Kameleoon
- Kong vs mabl
- Kong vs PractiTest
- Kong vs QA Wolf
- Kong vs Split
- Kong vs WebdriverIO
- Puppeteer vs Convoy
- Puppeteer vs PocketBase
- Puppeteer vs Appwrite
- Puppeteer vs Hasura
- Puppeteer vs Sanity
- Puppeteer vs Tyk
- Puppeteer vs WSO2 API Manager
- Puppeteer vs Gravitee
- Puppeteer vs Janus Gateway
- Puppeteer vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Puppeteer vs 3scale
- Puppeteer vs Akana
- Puppeteer vs Enable Banking
- Puppeteer vs Flybits
- Puppeteer vs i2c
- Puppeteer vs KeystoneJS
- Puppeteer vs Liveblocks
- Puppeteer vs Moesif
- Puppeteer vs Selenium
- Puppeteer vs Playwright
- Puppeteer vs Appium
- Puppeteer vs Qase
- Puppeteer vs TestNG
- Puppeteer vs Ranorex
- Puppeteer vs BrowserStack
- Puppeteer vs Cypress
- Puppeteer vs CircleCI
- Puppeteer vs Insomnia
- Puppeteer vs BugHerd
- Puppeteer vs Kameleoon
- Puppeteer vs mabl
- Puppeteer vs PractiTest
- Puppeteer vs QA Wolf
- Puppeteer vs Split
- Puppeteer vs WebdriverIO


