Marketing · head to head
Countly vs Syft

Syft
Cybersecurity
Generates a software bill of materials from images, filesystems and archives
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Countly the private cloud plan starts at $175 a month and is described as usage based without stating the unit; Syft lockfile parsing can drop packages silently. An open issue filed in August 2026 reports the yarn v1 cataloguer returning 118 of 745 packages with no error raised, which means a complete bill of materials and an 84 percent incomplete one look identical to the caller.
- They diverge on capability: Countly covers Event tracking, Syft covers Multi-format output.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Countly and Syft actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Countly
- Event tracking
- Crash reporting
- Analytics dashboard
- User retention
- Open-source
- Cloud deployment
- On-premise deployment
- Web support
Only in Syft
- Multi-format output
- Broad ecosystem coverage
- Binary classifiers
- In-toto attestations
- Library and CLI
- Pairs with Grype
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Countly
- Product analytics for mobile and web applicationsnot Syft
- Self hosting analytics where data cannot leave the organisationnot Syft
Syft
- Producing a bill of materials for a customer or regulator that requires onenot Countly
- Feeding an inventory into a vulnerability scanner rather than scanning images directlynot Countly
- Recording what shipped in a build so a future disclosure can be answered quicklynot Countly
- Public sector work where an SBOM is a contractual deliverablenot Countly
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Countly
- The private cloud plan starts at $175 a month and is described as usage based without stating the unit
- No event cap, data point limit or user limit is published for either paid plan
- The self hosted Enterprise edition is custom priced and billed annually
- Adaptivity and intelligence features are separately priced add ons on the cheaper plan
Syft
- Lockfile parsing can drop packages silently. An open issue filed in August 2026 reports the yarn v1 cataloguer returning 118 of 745 packages with no error raised, which means a complete bill of materials and an 84 percent incomplete one look identical to the caller.
- Fidelity varies sharply by ecosystem. Conan for C and C++, Haskell and Terraform get cataloguer support with no licence data, no dependency relationships and no file ownership, so a C and C++ shop gets the least from it.
- Binary classification yields no licence or dependency metadata, and vendored or statically linked code is exactly where supply chain risk hides, so the blind spot and the risk overlap.
- Incorrect CPE values and CPE collisions are recorded as open issues, and since Grype matches on CPE and PURL, an inventory error becomes a false negative in the security report downstream.
- An inventory is not a risk assessment. Even a perfect bill of materials says a vulnerable version is present, never that the vulnerable function is called, and the triage burden lands entirely on the reader.
Pricing, plan by plan
Countly
Free- Flex (Private Cloud)$175/month
- Usage-based pricing (not seat-based)
- Advanced Analytics included
- Adaptivity and Intelligence available as add-ons
- Enterprise (Self-Hosted)$null/mo
- Custom pricing, requires demo booking
- All capabilities included
- Deploy on your infrastructure
Syft
Free- SyftFree
- Apache-2.0
- No usage limits
- Community support
- Anchore Enterprise$undefined/year
- Policy enforcement and reporting
- Federal and commercial tiers
- Pricing not published, quoted on request
Which should you pick?
Choose Countly if
- You need event tracking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Mobile, Api.
- You also want crash reporting.
Choose Syft if
- You need multi-format output.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- You also want broad ecosystem coverage.
Questions people ask
- Is Countly or Syft better?
- Neither clearly leads. Countly starts at Free and Syft at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Countly or Syft?
- Countly starts at Free and Syft at Free.
- Does Countly or Syft run on more platforms?
- Countly runs on Web, Mobile, Api. Syft runs on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- Can I use Countly for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Countly best used for?
- Countly is most often used for product analytics for mobile and web applications, self hosting analytics where data cannot leave the organisation. Of those, product analytics for mobile and web applications and self hosting analytics where data cannot leave the organisation are not what Syft is typically brought in for.
- What can Countly do that Syft cannot?
- Countly covers Event tracking, Crash reporting, Analytics dashboard, User retention. Syft covers Multi-format output, Broad ecosystem coverage, Binary classifiers, In-toto attestations.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Countly: How much does Countly cost?
Countly's Flex plan (private cloud) starts at $175/month with pay-as-you-go cancellation. Enterprise (self-hosted) requires custom pricing and annual billing. Both plans include advanced analytics, and Flex offers a 14-day free trial.
SourceSyft: Does Syft find vulnerabilities?
No. It produces an inventory. Grype, from the same company, matches that inventory against vulnerability feeds. They are separate tools and the distinction is frequently lost.
Countly: What is the difference between Countly Flex and Enterprise plans?
Flex uses usage-based pricing on Countly's cloud with monthly billing. Enterprise requires custom pricing and annual billing, but allows self-hosting on your infrastructure with zero vendor access to data, dedicated support, and included SLA.
SourceSyft: Does anything in the Anchore stack do reachability analysis?
No. Neither Syft, Grype nor the commercial Anchore platform performs call graph or reachability analysis, so none of them tells you whether a vulnerable code path is actually invoked.
Countly: Can I add Adaptivity and Intelligence to Countly Flex?
Yes, Adaptivity and Intelligence suites can be added to Flex as needed. Both are included standard with Enterprise plans.
SourceSyft: Is it a CNCF or OpenSSF project?
No. It is single-vendor open source owned by Anchore, with no foundation governance. That is a different licence risk profile from Sigstore.
Syft: What does Anchore Enterprise cost?
Not published. The pricing page is contact-sales only, with named but unpriced commercial and federal tiers.
Syft: How do I know my SBOM is complete?
You largely cannot, which is the honest answer. Silent partial parsing is a known open defect, so a bill of materials used for compliance should be spot-checked against a known dependency list.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Countly vs Crazy Egg
- Countly vs Ruler Analytics
- Countly vs VWO
- Countly vs Northbeam
- Countly vs Umami
- Countly vs Matomo
- Countly vs Mautic
- Countly vs June
- Countly vs CleverTap
- Countly vs Moz
- Countly vs Microsoft Clarity
- Countly vs Netcore Cloud
- Countly vs Whatagraph
- Countly vs MoEngage
- Countly vs Optimizely
- Countly vs Vimeo
- Countly vs Attribution
- Countly vs Fathom Analytics
- Countly vs Cosign
- Countly vs Sigstore
- Countly vs Trivy
- Countly vs Chainguard
- Countly vs Metasploit
- Countly vs Wireshark
- Countly vs Semgrep
- Countly vs Legit Security
- Countly vs OWASP ZAP
- Countly vs HashiCorp Vault
- Countly vs Bitwarden
- Countly vs Infisical
- Countly vs Tenable Nessus
- Countly vs Transmit Security
- Countly vs TrustArc
- Countly vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Countly vs VMware Carbon Black
- Syft vs Crazy Egg
- Syft vs Ruler Analytics
- Syft vs VWO
- Syft vs Northbeam
- Syft vs Umami
- Syft vs Matomo
- Syft vs Mautic
- Syft vs June
- Syft vs CleverTap
- Syft vs Moz
- Syft vs Microsoft Clarity
- Syft vs Netcore Cloud
- Syft vs Whatagraph
- Syft vs MoEngage
- Syft vs Optimizely
- Syft vs Vimeo
- Syft vs Attribution
- Syft vs Fathom Analytics
- Syft vs Cosign
- Syft vs Sigstore
- Syft vs Trivy
- Syft vs Chainguard
- Syft vs Metasploit
- Syft vs Wireshark
- Syft vs Semgrep
- Syft vs Legit Security
- Syft vs OWASP ZAP
- Syft vs HashiCorp Vault
- Syft vs Bitwarden
- Syft vs Infisical
- Syft vs Tenable Nessus
- Syft vs Transmit Security
- Syft vs TrustArc
- Syft vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Syft vs VMware Carbon Black

