Databases · head to head
CosmosDB vs EMQX

CosmosDB
Databases
Globally distributed, multi-model database service from Azure
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

EMQX
Databases
Erlang MQTT broker for large IoT fleets, relicensed to BSL with production free use limited to one node
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: CosmosDB autoscale provisioned throughput enforces a minimum of 1,000 RU/s, billed hourly whether or not the database is used; EMQX the move to Business Source Licence 1.1 at version 5.9 in May 2025 limits free production use to a single node, so the clustering that justifies choosing EMQX now requires a paid subscription from the second node onward.
- They diverge on capability: CosmosDB covers Global Distribution, EMQX covers Erlang clustering.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CosmosDB and EMQX actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CosmosDB
- Global Distribution
- Multi-model APIs
- Elastic Scaling
- Five Consistency Levels
- SLA-backed Latency
- Automatic Indexing
- Serverless
- Azure Functions
Only in EMQX
- Erlang clustering
- MQTT 5.0 and QUIC
- Rule engine
- Data integration sinks
- Session persistence
- Multi protocol gateways
- Authentication and authorisation
- Dashboard and REST API
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CosmosDB
- Running a globally distributed multi model database on Azurenot EMQX
- Serving low latency reads and writes from multiple Azure regionsnot EMQX
- Storing document, key value and graph data behind a managed servicenot EMQX
EMQX
- A connected vehicle platform needing millions of persistent MQTT sessions with QUIC for handover across mobile networksnot CosmosDB
- An industrial operator routing sensor telemetry straight into TimescaleDB or Kafka without writing a consumer servicenot CosmosDB
- An IoT product team that has outgrown a single Mosquitto instance and needs clustering and shared subscriptionsnot CosmosDB
- A smart building deployment mixing MQTT, CoAP and LwM2M devices on one brokernot CosmosDB
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CosmosDB
- Autoscale provisioned throughput enforces a minimum of 1,000 RU/s, billed hourly whether or not the database is used
- Provisioned throughput is charged in every region the account is replicated to, so multi region accounts multiply the RU bill
- Storage charges cover data, indexes and backups in each replicated region
- Egress out of Azure and between regions is charged, though ingress is free
- The free allowance is one account per Azure subscription, limited to 1,000 RU/s and 25 GB
- RU/s rates vary by region and are only shown through the pricing calculator rather than a flat published rate
EMQX
- The move to Business Source Licence 1.1 at version 5.9 in May 2025 limits free production use to a single node, so the clustering that justifies choosing EMQX now requires a paid subscription from the second node onward.
- The relicensing arrived in a minor release, which caught users who had pinned to 5.x expecting Apache 2.0 terms and forced legal review of existing deployments.
- Running an Erlang/OTP cluster well requires operational knowledge most teams do not have, and diagnosing distribution, mnesia or memory issues means learning a runtime you use for nothing else.
- Enterprise pricing is quoted rather than published for the self-managed edition, so the cost of the clustered configuration you actually need is invisible until you talk to sales.
- The Serverless tier caps at around a thousand connections and shares infrastructure, which makes it a prototyping tier rather than a genuine small production option.
Pricing, plan by plan
CosmosDB
Free- Free TierFree
- 1000 RU/s
- 25GB storage
- First 12 months
- ServerlessFree
- Pay per request
- Auto-scaling
- Event-driven workloads
EMQX
Free- Open Source single nodeFree
- BSL 1.1 licence since version 5.9
- Free production use of one node only
- All former enterprise features visible
- ServerlessFree
- Free monthly quota then pay as you go
- Up to 1,000 connections
- 8 by 5 support
- Dedicated Flex$234/month
- Single tenant cluster
- Traffic allowance included
- 24/7 support
- Enterprise self-managed$undefined/year
- Deploy on premises, at the edge or in any cloud
- Clustering licensed
- 256 MB maximum message size
Which should you pick?
Choose CosmosDB if
- You need global distribution.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Azure.
- You also want multi-model apis.
Choose EMQX if
- You need erlang clustering.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud, macOS.
- You also want mqtt 5.0 and quic.
Questions people ask
- Is CosmosDB or EMQX better?
- Neither clearly leads. CosmosDB starts at Free and EMQX at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CosmosDB or EMQX?
- CosmosDB starts at Free and EMQX at Free.
- Does CosmosDB or EMQX run on more platforms?
- CosmosDB runs on Web, Azure. EMQX runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud, macOS.
- Can I use CosmosDB for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is CosmosDB best used for?
- CosmosDB is most often used for running a globally distributed multi model database on azure, serving low latency reads and writes from multiple azure regions, storing document, key value and graph data behind a managed service. Of those, running a globally distributed multi model database on azure and serving low latency reads and writes from multiple azure regions are not what EMQX is typically brought in for.
- What can CosmosDB do that EMQX cannot?
- CosmosDB covers Global Distribution, Multi-model APIs, Elastic Scaling, Five Consistency Levels. EMQX covers Erlang clustering, MQTT 5.0 and QUIC, Rule engine, Data integration sinks.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CosmosDB: Is there a free tier for Azure Cosmos DB?
Yes, Cosmos DB offers a free tier with 1,000 RU/s of throughput and 25 GB of storage per month for the lifetime of the account, available to new accounts.
SourceEMQX: Is EMQX still open source?
Not in the OSI sense since version 5.9. It is source-available under Business Source Licence 1.1, reverting to Apache 2.0 four years after each release.
CosmosDB: How is Cosmos DB priced after the free tier?
Cosmos DB uses three billing models: provisioned throughput billed per request unit per second, vCore pricing for certain APIs, or serverless consumption pricing where you pay only for requests processed. Reserved capacity offers 20% discount for one year or 30% for three years.
SourceEMQX: Can I run a free cluster?
No. The additional use grant permits free production use of one node; clustering requires a commercial licence.
CosmosDB: Can I change my pricing model after choosing one?
No. Once you select a compute pricing model and API, they cannot be changed. This choice is permanent for that database.
SourceEMQX: What changed for existing users?
Community and enterprise editions merged, so all features are now visible, but the licence terms tightened in the same minor release.
CosmosDB: Is there a trial period for Cosmos DB beyond the free tier?
Azure offers a 30-day free trial account for all Azure services. Additionally, Azure AI customers may be eligible for a 90-day free Cosmos DB subscription through the Azure AI Advantage program.
SourceEMQX: Which version is still Apache 2.0?
Releases before 5.9 remain under Apache 2.0, and each BSL release converts to Apache 2.0 four years after publication.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- CosmosDB vs Amazon Aurora
- CosmosDB vs Cockroach Labs
- CosmosDB vs Airtable
- CosmosDB vs PostgreSQL
- CosmosDB vs Google Cloud SQL
- CosmosDB vs ArangoDB
- CosmosDB vs DataStax
- CosmosDB vs FaunaDB
- CosmosDB vs Firebolt
- CosmosDB vs turbopuffer
- CosmosDB vs VerneMQ
- CosmosDB vs Vespa
- CosmosDB vs Xata
- CosmosDB vs YugabyteDB
- CosmosDB vs Zilliz
- CosmosDB vs Amazon Redshift
- CosmosDB vs BigQuery
- CosmosDB vs Amazon RDS
- CosmosDB vs RabbitMQ
- CosmosDB vs NATS
- CosmosDB vs Solace PubSub+
- CosmosDB vs Canary Labs
- CosmosDB vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- CosmosDB vs TimescaleDB
- CosmosDB vs Turso
- CosmosDB vs Chroma
- CosmosDB vs DuckDB
- CosmosDB vs Teradata
- CosmosDB vs Apache Kafka
- CosmosDB vs Immuta
- CosmosDB vs MariaDB
- CosmosDB vs Materialize
- CosmosDB vs Oracle Database
- EMQX vs Amazon Aurora
- EMQX vs Cockroach Labs
- EMQX vs Airtable
- EMQX vs PostgreSQL
- EMQX vs Google Cloud SQL
- EMQX vs ArangoDB
- EMQX vs DataStax
- EMQX vs FaunaDB
- EMQX vs Firebolt
- EMQX vs turbopuffer
- EMQX vs VerneMQ
- EMQX vs Vespa
- EMQX vs Xata
- EMQX vs YugabyteDB
- EMQX vs Zilliz
- EMQX vs Amazon Redshift
- EMQX vs BigQuery
- EMQX vs Amazon RDS
- EMQX vs RabbitMQ
- EMQX vs NATS
- EMQX vs Solace PubSub+
- EMQX vs Canary Labs
- EMQX vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- EMQX vs TimescaleDB
- EMQX vs Turso
- EMQX vs Chroma
- EMQX vs DuckDB
- EMQX vs Teradata
- EMQX vs Apache Kafka
- EMQX vs Immuta
- EMQX vs MariaDB
- EMQX vs Materialize
- EMQX vs Oracle Database
