Databases · head to head
EMQX vs MariaDB

EMQX
Databases
Erlang MQTT broker for large IoT fleets, relicensed to BSL with production free use limited to one node
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

MariaDB
Databases
The open source relational database for the enterprise
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: EMQX the move to Business Source Licence 1.1 at version 5.9 in May 2025 limits free production use to a single node, so the clustering that justifies choosing EMQX now requires a paid subscription from the second node onward.; MariaDB jSON support using text fields rather than native binary type; lacks MySQL's JSON syntax and functions
- They diverge on capability: EMQX covers Erlang clustering, MariaDB covers MySQL Compatibility.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which EMQX and MariaDB actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in EMQX
- Erlang clustering
- MQTT 5.0 and QUIC
- Rule engine
- Data integration sinks
- Session persistence
- Multi protocol gateways
- Authentication and authorisation
- Dashboard and REST API
Only in MariaDB
- MySQL Compatibility
- Aria Storage Engine
- ColumnStore
- Galera Cluster
- MaxScale
- Spider Engine
- Temporal Tables
- phpMyAdmin
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
EMQX
- A connected vehicle platform needing millions of persistent MQTT sessions with QUIC for handover across mobile networksnot MariaDB
- An industrial operator routing sensor telemetry straight into TimescaleDB or Kafka without writing a consumer servicenot MariaDB
- An IoT product team that has outgrown a single Mosquitto instance and needs clustering and shared subscriptionsnot MariaDB
- A smart building deployment mixing MQTT, CoAP and LwM2M devices on one brokernot MariaDB
MariaDB
- Transaction processingnot EMQX
- Data storagenot EMQX
- Application backendnot EMQX
- Reportingnot EMQX
- Data analyticsnot EMQX
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
EMQX
- The move to Business Source Licence 1.1 at version 5.9 in May 2025 limits free production use to a single node, so the clustering that justifies choosing EMQX now requires a paid subscription from the second node onward.
- The relicensing arrived in a minor release, which caught users who had pinned to 5.x expecting Apache 2.0 terms and forced legal review of existing deployments.
- Running an Erlang/OTP cluster well requires operational knowledge most teams do not have, and diagnosing distribution, mnesia or memory issues means learning a runtime you use for nothing else.
- Enterprise pricing is quoted rather than published for the self-managed edition, so the cost of the clustered configuration you actually need is invisible until you talk to sales.
- The Serverless tier caps at around a thousand connections and shares infrastructure, which makes it a prototyping tier rather than a genuine small production option.
MariaDB
- JSON support using text fields rather than native binary type; lacks MySQL's JSON syntax and functions
- Galera Cluster maximum performance limited to the slowest node in cluster
- InnoDB tables limited to 1,017 columns and 64 secondary indexes
- Transaction size limits in Galera (128K rows and 2GB by default)
- Less strict SQL type checking than PostgreSQL; allows implicit conversions
Pricing, plan by plan
EMQX
Free- Open Source single nodeFree
- BSL 1.1 licence since version 5.9
- Free production use of one node only
- All former enterprise features visible
- ServerlessFree
- Free monthly quota then pay as you go
- Up to 1,000 connections
- 8 by 5 support
- Dedicated Flex$234/month
- Single tenant cluster
- Traffic allowance included
- 24/7 support
- Enterprise self-managed$undefined/year
- Deploy on premises, at the edge or in any cloud
- Clustering licensed
- 256 MB maximum message size
MariaDB
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the MariaDB review.
Which should you pick?
Choose EMQX if
- You need erlang clustering.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud, macOS.
- You also want mqtt 5.0 and quic.
Choose MariaDB if
- You need mysql compatibility.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Unix, Windows, macOS.
- You also want aria storage engine.
Questions people ask
- Is EMQX or MariaDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. EMQX starts at Free and MariaDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, EMQX or MariaDB?
- EMQX starts at Free and MariaDB at Free.
- Does EMQX or MariaDB run on more platforms?
- EMQX runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud, macOS. MariaDB runs on Linux, Unix, Windows, macOS.
- Can I use EMQX for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is EMQX best used for?
- EMQX is most often used for a connected vehicle platform needing millions of persistent mqtt sessions with quic for handover across mobile networks, an industrial operator routing sensor telemetry straight into timescaledb or kafka without writing a consumer service, an iot product team that has outgrown a single mosquitto instance and needs clustering and shared subscriptions, a smart building deployment mixing mqtt, coap and lwm2m devices on one broker. Of those, a connected vehicle platform needing millions of persistent mqtt sessions with quic for handover across mobile networks and an industrial operator routing sensor telemetry straight into timescaledb or kafka without writing a consumer service are not what MariaDB is typically brought in for.
- What can EMQX do that MariaDB cannot?
- EMQX covers Erlang clustering, MQTT 5.0 and QUIC, Rule engine, Data integration sinks. MariaDB covers MySQL Compatibility, Aria Storage Engine, ColumnStore, Galera Cluster.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
EMQX: Is EMQX still open source?
Not in the OSI sense since version 5.9. It is source-available under Business Source Licence 1.1, reverting to Apache 2.0 four years after each release.
MariaDB: Is MariaDB completely free and open source?
Yes. MariaDB Server is licensed under GPLv2 and guaranteed to remain perpetually free and open source, independent of any commercial entities.
SourceEMQX: Can I run a free cluster?
No. The additional use grant permits free production use of one node; clustering requires a commercial licence.
MariaDB: Is MariaDB backward compatible with MySQL?
Yes. MariaDB was designed as a drop-in replacement for MySQL. Every application, driver, and configuration that worked with MySQL works with MariaDB without code changes.
SourceEMQX: What changed for existing users?
Community and enterprise editions merged, so all features are now visible, but the licence terms tightened in the same minor release.
MariaDB: What are the storage engine options in MariaDB?
MariaDB supports multiple storage engines including InnoDB (transactional, default), Aria (crash-safe, good for read-heavy workloads), and MyISAM. The Aria engine is faster than InnoDB for certain read-heavy queries and full table scans.
SourceEMQX: Which version is still Apache 2.0?
Releases before 5.9 remain under Apache 2.0, and each BSL release converts to Apache 2.0 four years after publication.
MariaDB: How much does MariaDB cost?
MariaDB Community Server is completely free to download and use. MariaDB offers paid enterprise support and managed cloud services for organizations needing professional support.
SourceMariaDB: Does MariaDB support native JSON storage?
MariaDB stores JSON using text fields (the JSON type is an alias for LONGTEXT), not as a native binary type like MySQL does. JSON support exists but is less sophisticated than MySQL's JSON functions and syntax.
SourceMariaDB: What scaling options does MariaDB provide?
MariaDB supports both scaling up (more cores, memory, storage) and scaling out (read replication, Galera Cluster with multi-node replication). However, Galera Cluster performance cannot exceed the slowest node in the cluster.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- EMQX vs VerneMQ
- EMQX vs RabbitMQ
- EMQX vs NATS
- EMQX vs Solace PubSub+
- EMQX vs Canary Labs
- EMQX vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- EMQX vs TimescaleDB
- EMQX vs Turso
- EMQX vs Chroma
- EMQX vs DuckDB
- EMQX vs Teradata
- EMQX vs Apache Kafka
- EMQX vs Immuta
- EMQX vs Materialize
- EMQX vs Oracle Database
- EMQX vs PostgreSQL
- EMQX vs Microsoft SQL Server
- EMQX vs SQLite
- EMQX vs Amazon Aurora
- EMQX vs IBM Db2
- EMQX vs Google Cloud SQL
- EMQX vs Presto
- EMQX vs Aiven
- EMQX vs OpenSearch
- EMQX vs TiDB
- EMQX vs Firestore
- EMQX vs Memcached
- EMQX vs MotherDuck
- EMQX vs Neo4j
- EMQX vs Qdrant
- EMQX vs Valkey
- MariaDB vs VerneMQ
- MariaDB vs RabbitMQ
- MariaDB vs NATS
- MariaDB vs Solace PubSub+
- MariaDB vs Canary Labs
- MariaDB vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- MariaDB vs TimescaleDB
- MariaDB vs Turso
- MariaDB vs Chroma
- MariaDB vs DuckDB
- MariaDB vs Teradata
- MariaDB vs Apache Kafka
- MariaDB vs Immuta
- MariaDB vs Materialize
- MariaDB vs Oracle Database
- MariaDB vs PostgreSQL
- MariaDB vs Microsoft SQL Server
- MariaDB vs SQLite
- MariaDB vs Amazon Aurora
- MariaDB vs IBM Db2
- MariaDB vs Google Cloud SQL
- MariaDB vs Presto
- MariaDB vs Aiven
- MariaDB vs OpenSearch
- MariaDB vs TiDB
- MariaDB vs Firestore
- MariaDB vs Memcached
- MariaDB vs MotherDuck
- MariaDB vs Neo4j
- MariaDB vs Qdrant
- MariaDB vs Valkey
