Software · head to head
CosmosDB vs MariaDB
CosmosDB
Software
Globally distributed, multi-model database service from Azure
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

MariaDB
Software
The open source relational database for the enterprise
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: CosmosDB autoscale provisioned throughput enforces a minimum of 1,000 RU/s, billed hourly whether or not the database is used; MariaDB jSON support using text fields rather than native binary type; lacks MySQL's JSON syntax and functions
- They diverge on capability: CosmosDB covers Global Distribution, MariaDB covers MySQL Compatibility.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CosmosDB and MariaDB actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CosmosDB
- Global Distribution
- Multi-model APIs
- Elastic Scaling
- Five Consistency Levels
- SLA-backed Latency
- Automatic Indexing
- Serverless
- Azure Functions
Only in MariaDB
- MySQL Compatibility
- Aria Storage Engine
- ColumnStore
- Galera Cluster
- MaxScale
- Spider Engine
- Temporal Tables
- phpMyAdmin
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CosmosDB
- Running a globally distributed multi model database on Azurenot MariaDB
- Serving low latency reads and writes from multiple Azure regionsnot MariaDB
- Storing document, key value and graph data behind a managed servicenot MariaDB
MariaDB
- Transaction processingnot CosmosDB
- Data storagenot CosmosDB
- Application backendnot CosmosDB
- Reportingnot CosmosDB
- Data analyticsnot CosmosDB
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CosmosDB
- Autoscale provisioned throughput enforces a minimum of 1,000 RU/s, billed hourly whether or not the database is used
- Provisioned throughput is charged in every region the account is replicated to, so multi region accounts multiply the RU bill
- Storage charges cover data, indexes and backups in each replicated region
- Egress out of Azure and between regions is charged, though ingress is free
- The free allowance is one account per Azure subscription, limited to 1,000 RU/s and 25 GB
- RU/s rates vary by region and are only shown through the pricing calculator rather than a flat published rate
MariaDB
- JSON support using text fields rather than native binary type; lacks MySQL's JSON syntax and functions
- Galera Cluster maximum performance limited to the slowest node in cluster
- InnoDB tables limited to 1,017 columns and 64 secondary indexes
- Transaction size limits in Galera (128K rows and 2GB by default)
- Less strict SQL type checking than PostgreSQL; allows implicit conversions
Pricing, plan by plan
CosmosDB
Free- Free TierFree
- 1000 RU/s
- 25GB storage
- First 12 months
- ServerlessFree
- Pay per request
- Auto-scaling
- Event-driven workloads
MariaDB
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the MariaDB review.
Which should you pick?
Choose CosmosDB if
- You need global distribution.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Azure.
- You also want multi-model apis.
Choose MariaDB if
- You need mysql compatibility.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Unix, Windows, macOS.
- You also want aria storage engine.
Questions people ask
- Is CosmosDB or MariaDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. CosmosDB starts at Free and MariaDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CosmosDB or MariaDB?
- CosmosDB starts at Free and MariaDB at Free.
- Does CosmosDB or MariaDB run on more platforms?
- CosmosDB runs on Web, Azure. MariaDB runs on Linux, Unix, Windows, macOS.
- Can I use CosmosDB for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is CosmosDB best used for?
- CosmosDB is most often used for running a globally distributed multi model database on azure, serving low latency reads and writes from multiple azure regions, storing document, key value and graph data behind a managed service. Of those, running a globally distributed multi model database on azure and serving low latency reads and writes from multiple azure regions are not what MariaDB is typically brought in for.
- What can CosmosDB do that MariaDB cannot?
- CosmosDB covers Global Distribution, Multi-model APIs, Elastic Scaling, Five Consistency Levels. MariaDB covers MySQL Compatibility, Aria Storage Engine, ColumnStore, Galera Cluster.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
MariaDB: Is MariaDB completely free and open source?
Yes. MariaDB Server is licensed under GPLv2 and guaranteed to remain perpetually free and open source, independent of any commercial entities.
SourceMariaDB: Is MariaDB backward compatible with MySQL?
Yes. MariaDB was designed as a drop-in replacement for MySQL. Every application, driver, and configuration that worked with MySQL works with MariaDB without code changes.
SourceMariaDB: What are the storage engine options in MariaDB?
MariaDB supports multiple storage engines including InnoDB (transactional, default), Aria (crash-safe, good for read-heavy workloads), and MyISAM. The Aria engine is faster than InnoDB for certain read-heavy queries and full table scans.
SourceMariaDB: How much does MariaDB cost?
MariaDB Community Server is completely free to download and use. MariaDB offers paid enterprise support and managed cloud services for organizations needing professional support.
SourceMariaDB: Does MariaDB support native JSON storage?
MariaDB stores JSON using text fields (the JSON type is an alias for LONGTEXT), not as a native binary type like MySQL does. JSON support exists but is less sophisticated than MySQL's JSON functions and syntax.
SourceMariaDB: What scaling options does MariaDB provide?
MariaDB supports both scaling up (more cores, memory, storage) and scaling out (read replication, Galera Cluster with multi-node replication). However, Galera Cluster performance cannot exceed the slowest node in the cluster.
SourceRelated pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- CosmosDB vs Cockroach Labs
- CosmosDB vs PostgreSQL
- CosmosDB vs Airtable
- CosmosDB vs Amazon Aurora
- CosmosDB vs Elasticsearch
- CosmosDB vs PlanetScale
- CosmosDB vs Azure SQL
- CosmosDB vs ClickHouse
- CosmosDB vs Couchbase
- CosmosDB vs DuckDB
- CosmosDB vs DynamoDB
- CosmosDB vs Oracle Database
- CosmosDB vs Amazon RDS
- CosmosDB vs Amazon Redshift
- CosmosDB vs Apache Druid
- CosmosDB vs Cassandra
- CosmosDB vs CouchDB
- CosmosDB vs Firebolt
- MariaDB vs Cockroach Labs
- MariaDB vs PostgreSQL
- MariaDB vs Airtable
- MariaDB vs Amazon Aurora
- MariaDB vs Elasticsearch
- MariaDB vs PlanetScale
- MariaDB vs Azure SQL
- MariaDB vs ClickHouse
- MariaDB vs Couchbase
- MariaDB vs DuckDB
- MariaDB vs DynamoDB
- MariaDB vs Oracle Database
- MariaDB vs Amazon RDS
- MariaDB vs Amazon Redshift
- MariaDB vs Apache Druid
- MariaDB vs Cassandra
- MariaDB vs CouchDB
- MariaDB vs Firebolt
