Databases · head to head
Airtable vs EMQX

EMQX
Databases
Erlang MQTT broker for large IoT fleets, relicensed to BSL with production free use limited to one node
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Airtable hitting a plan limit blocks adding records or attachments entirely until you upgrade, rather than degrading gracefully; EMQX the move to Business Source Licence 1.1 at version 5.9 in May 2025 limits free production use to a single node, so the clustering that justifies choosing EMQX now requires a paid subscription from the second node onward.
- They diverge on capability: Airtable covers Spreadsheet-database hybrid, EMQX covers Erlang clustering.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Airtable and EMQX actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Airtable
- Spreadsheet-database hybrid
- Custom views
- Automation
- Forms
- Integrations
- Mobile apps
- Real-time collaboration
- API access
Only in EMQX
- Erlang clustering
- MQTT 5.0 and QUIC
- Rule engine
- Data integration sinks
- Session persistence
- Multi protocol gateways
- Authentication and authorisation
- Dashboard and REST API
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Airtable
- Structured team databases with grid, calendar and kanban viewsnot EMQX
- Lightweight internal tools built on shared recordsnot EMQX
- Automations between Airtable and other systemsnot EMQX
- Sharing read-only views with collaborators, who are not chargednot EMQX
- Collecting submissions through forms without paying for a seatnot EMQX
EMQX
- A connected vehicle platform needing millions of persistent MQTT sessions with QUIC for handover across mobile networksnot Airtable
- An industrial operator routing sensor telemetry straight into TimescaleDB or Kafka without writing a consumer servicenot Airtable
- An IoT product team that has outgrown a single Mosquitto instance and needs clustering and shared subscriptionsnot Airtable
- A smart building deployment mixing MQTT, CoAP and LwM2M devices on one brokernot Airtable
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Airtable
- Hitting a plan limit blocks adding records or attachments entirely until you upgrade, rather than degrading gracefully
- Team is $20 per user per month and Business $45, both at the annual rate
- Automation and API usage are capped by plan
- Enterprise Scale pricing is not published
EMQX
- The move to Business Source Licence 1.1 at version 5.9 in May 2025 limits free production use to a single node, so the clustering that justifies choosing EMQX now requires a paid subscription from the second node onward.
- The relicensing arrived in a minor release, which caught users who had pinned to 5.x expecting Apache 2.0 terms and forced legal review of existing deployments.
- Running an Erlang/OTP cluster well requires operational knowledge most teams do not have, and diagnosing distribution, mnesia or memory issues means learning a runtime you use for nothing else.
- Enterprise pricing is quoted rather than published for the self-managed edition, so the cost of the clustered configuration you actually need is invisible until you talk to sales.
- The Serverless tier caps at around a thousand connections and shares infrastructure, which makes it a prototyping tier rather than a genuine small production option.
Pricing, plan by plan
Airtable
Free- FreeFree
- Unlimited bases
- 1,000 records per base
- Up to 5 editors
- Team$20/month per editor annual
- 50,000 records per base
- Unlimited automations
- API access
- Business$45/month per editor annual
- 125,000 records per base
- Advanced permissions
- Priority support
- Enterprise Scale$undefined/custom
- 500,000+ records per base
- Custom SLA
- Dedicated support
EMQX
Free- Open Source single nodeFree
- BSL 1.1 licence since version 5.9
- Free production use of one node only
- All former enterprise features visible
- ServerlessFree
- Free monthly quota then pay as you go
- Up to 1,000 connections
- 8 by 5 support
- Dedicated Flex$234/month
- Single tenant cluster
- Traffic allowance included
- 24/7 support
- Enterprise self-managed$undefined/year
- Deploy on premises, at the edge or in any cloud
- Clustering licensed
- 256 MB maximum message size
Which should you pick?
Choose Airtable if
- You need spreadsheet-database hybrid.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Desktop.
- You also want custom views.
Choose EMQX if
- You need erlang clustering.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud, macOS.
- You also want mqtt 5.0 and quic.
Questions people ask
- Is Airtable or EMQX better?
- Neither clearly leads. Airtable starts at Free and EMQX at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Airtable or EMQX?
- Airtable starts at Free and EMQX at Free.
- Does Airtable or EMQX run on more platforms?
- Airtable runs on Web, iOS, Android, Desktop. EMQX runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud, macOS.
- Can I use Airtable for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Airtable best used for?
- Airtable is most often used for structured team databases with grid, calendar and kanban views, lightweight internal tools built on shared records, automations between airtable and other systems, sharing read-only views with collaborators, who are not charged. Of those, structured team databases with grid, calendar and kanban views and lightweight internal tools built on shared records are not what EMQX is typically brought in for.
- What can Airtable do that EMQX cannot?
- Airtable covers Spreadsheet-database hybrid, Custom views, Automation, Forms. EMQX covers Erlang clustering, MQTT 5.0 and QUIC, Rule engine, Data integration sinks.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Airtable: Is there a free Airtable plan and what does it include?
Yes, Airtable's Free plan is indefinite with unlimited bases, 1,000 records per base, up to 5 editors, 1 GB storage per base, 100 automation runs per month, and core features like Interface Designer and mobile apps.
SourceEMQX: Is EMQX still open source?
Not in the OSI sense since version 5.9. It is source-available under Business Source Licence 1.1, reverting to Apache 2.0 four years after each release.
Airtable: How does Airtable handle permissions and viewers?
Airtable charges per editor only. Read-only viewers, form submitters, and people accessing share links are free on every plan, making it cost-effective for large viewing audiences.
SourceEMQX: Can I run a free cluster?
No. The additional use grant permits free production use of one node; clustering requires a commercial licence.
Airtable: What are Airtable's record limits?
Free plan has 1,000 records per base, Team plan has 50,000, Business plan has 125,000, and Enterprise Scale has 500,000+ records. Performance degrades past 100,000 records in a single base.
SourceEMQX: What changed for existing users?
Community and enterprise editions merged, so all features are now visible, but the licence terms tightened in the same minor release.
Airtable: Can Airtable integrate with other tools like Slack?
Yes, Airtable integrates with Slack via Zapier or Make.com, allowing automation like sending Slack messages when records are created or updated. Airtable also has a native API for direct integrations.
SourceEMQX: Which version is still Apache 2.0?
Releases before 5.9 remain under Apache 2.0, and each BSL release converts to Apache 2.0 four years after publication.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Airtable vs Turso
- Airtable vs Chroma
- Airtable vs Grist
- Airtable vs Ninox
- Airtable vs Cockroach Labs
- Airtable vs PlanetScale
- Airtable vs Apache Druid
- Airtable vs Couchbase
- Airtable vs DuckDB
- Airtable vs DynamoDB
- Airtable vs Azure SQL
- Airtable vs Immuta
- Airtable vs Apache Pinot
- Airtable vs CouchDB
- Airtable vs Apache Flink
- Airtable vs VerneMQ
- Airtable vs RabbitMQ
- Airtable vs NATS
- Airtable vs Solace PubSub+
- Airtable vs Canary Labs
- Airtable vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Airtable vs TimescaleDB
- Airtable vs Teradata
- Airtable vs Apache Kafka
- Airtable vs MariaDB
- Airtable vs Materialize
- Airtable vs Oracle Database
- EMQX vs Turso
- EMQX vs Chroma
- EMQX vs Grist
- EMQX vs Ninox
- EMQX vs Cockroach Labs
- EMQX vs PlanetScale
- EMQX vs Apache Druid
- EMQX vs Couchbase
- EMQX vs DuckDB
- EMQX vs DynamoDB
- EMQX vs Azure SQL
- EMQX vs Immuta
- EMQX vs Apache Pinot
- EMQX vs CouchDB
- EMQX vs Apache Flink
- EMQX vs VerneMQ
- EMQX vs RabbitMQ
- EMQX vs NATS
- EMQX vs Solace PubSub+
- EMQX vs Canary Labs
- EMQX vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- EMQX vs TimescaleDB
- EMQX vs Teradata
- EMQX vs Apache Kafka
- EMQX vs MariaDB
- EMQX vs Materialize
- EMQX vs Oracle Database

