Databases · head to head
CosmosDB vs TimescaleDB

CosmosDB
Databases
Globally distributed, multi-model database service from Azure
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

TimescaleDB
Databases
Time-series database built on PostgreSQL for real-time analytics
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: CosmosDB autoscale provisioned throughput enforces a minimum of 1,000 RU/s, billed hourly whether or not the database is used; TimescaleDB inherits PostgreSQL write path limitations, creating a ceiling on ingestion throughput
- They diverge on capability: CosmosDB covers Global Distribution, TimescaleDB covers Time-series Optimization.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CosmosDB and TimescaleDB actually diverge.
| Attribute | CosmosDB | TimescaleDB |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | Unknown |
| Platforms | Web, Azure | Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, GCP, Azure) |
| Founded | 1975 | 2012 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CosmosDB
- Global Distribution
- Multi-model APIs
- Elastic Scaling
- Five Consistency Levels
- SLA-backed Latency
- Automatic Indexing
- Serverless
- Azure Functions
Only in TimescaleDB
- Time-series Optimization
- PostgreSQL Extension
- Automatic Partitioning
- Continuous Aggregates
- Native Compression
- Full SQL Support
- Real-time Analytics
- PostgreSQL
Both cover
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CosmosDB
- Running a globally distributed multi model database on Azurenot TimescaleDB
- Serving low latency reads and writes from multiple Azure regionsnot TimescaleDB
- Storing document, key value and graph data behind a managed servicenot TimescaleDB
TimescaleDB
- Monitoringnot CosmosDB
- IoT datanot CosmosDB
- Financial datanot CosmosDB
- Log analyticsnot CosmosDB
- Observabilitynot CosmosDB
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CosmosDB
- Autoscale provisioned throughput enforces a minimum of 1,000 RU/s, billed hourly whether or not the database is used
- Provisioned throughput is charged in every region the account is replicated to, so multi region accounts multiply the RU bill
- Storage charges cover data, indexes and backups in each replicated region
- Egress out of Azure and between regions is charged, though ingress is free
- The free allowance is one account per Azure subscription, limited to 1,000 RU/s and 25 GB
- RU/s rates vary by region and are only shown through the pricing calculator rather than a flat published rate
TimescaleDB
- Inherits PostgreSQL write path limitations, creating a ceiling on ingestion throughput
- Operational complexity increases significantly at scale, requiring expertise in chunk tuning and autovacuum management
- Bloom filter indexes on compressed columns can return incorrect query results before upgrade
- PostgreSQL 15 support ending June 2026, forcing mandatory upgrades to PostgreSQL 16 or later
Pricing, plan by plan
CosmosDB
Free- Free TierFree
- 1000 RU/s
- 25GB storage
- First 12 months
- ServerlessFree
- Pay per request
- Auto-scaling
- Event-driven workloads
TimescaleDB
Free- Open SourceFree
- Self-hosted TimescaleDB
- MIT-licensed core
- Full PostgreSQL compatibility
- Scale Plan (Cloud)$36/month
- Compute and storage charges
- Multi-node HA
- Unlimited VPCs
Which should you pick?
Choose CosmosDB if
- You need global distribution.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Azure.
- You also want multi-model apis.
Choose TimescaleDB if
- You need time-series optimization.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, GCP, Azure).
- You also want postgresql extension.
Questions people ask
- Is CosmosDB or TimescaleDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. CosmosDB starts at Free and TimescaleDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CosmosDB or TimescaleDB?
- CosmosDB starts at Free and TimescaleDB at Free.
- Does CosmosDB or TimescaleDB run on more platforms?
- CosmosDB runs on Web, Azure. TimescaleDB runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, GCP, Azure).
- Can I use CosmosDB for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is CosmosDB best used for?
- CosmosDB is most often used for running a globally distributed multi model database on azure, serving low latency reads and writes from multiple azure regions, storing document, key value and graph data behind a managed service. Of those, running a globally distributed multi model database on azure and serving low latency reads and writes from multiple azure regions are not what TimescaleDB is typically brought in for.
- What can CosmosDB do that TimescaleDB cannot?
- CosmosDB covers Global Distribution, Multi-model APIs, Elastic Scaling, Five Consistency Levels. TimescaleDB covers Time-series Optimization, PostgreSQL Extension, Automatic Partitioning, Continuous Aggregates. Both handle Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CosmosDB: Is there a free tier for Azure Cosmos DB?
Yes, Cosmos DB offers a free tier with 1,000 RU/s of throughput and 25 GB of storage per month for the lifetime of the account, available to new accounts.
SourceTimescaleDB: Is TimescaleDB free?
Yes. TimescaleDB is free and open source under the Timescale License. The managed cloud service offers a free trial with $1,000 in credits expiring in 30 days.
SourceCosmosDB: How is Cosmos DB priced after the free tier?
Cosmos DB uses three billing models: provisioned throughput billed per request unit per second, vCore pricing for certain APIs, or serverless consumption pricing where you pay only for requests processed. Reserved capacity offers 20% discount for one year or 30% for three years.
SourceTimescaleDB: What database does TimescaleDB run on top of?
TimescaleDB is a PostgreSQL extension that runs on top of PostgreSQL. You retain full PostgreSQL compatibility including SQL queries, transactions, and ecosystem tools.
SourceCosmosDB: Can I change my pricing model after choosing one?
No. Once you select a compute pricing model and API, they cannot be changed. This choice is permanent for that database.
SourceTimescaleDB: How much can TimescaleDB compress data?
TimescaleDB offers transparent columnar compression that can reduce storage by up to 95%. Newer data remains in row-oriented format for fast writes, while older data is automatically compressed to the column store.
SourceCosmosDB: Is there a trial period for Cosmos DB beyond the free tier?
Azure offers a 30-day free trial account for all Azure services. Additionally, Azure AI customers may be eligible for a 90-day free Cosmos DB subscription through the Azure AI Advantage program.
SourceTimescaleDB: Does TimescaleDB require manual partitioning?
No. TimescaleDB handles automatic time-based partitioning through hypertables. Data is automatically chunked based on time intervals, requiring no manual partition management.
SourceTimescaleDB: What PostgreSQL versions does TimescaleDB support?
As of October 2025, TimescaleDB requires PostgreSQL 16 or greater. PostgreSQL 15 support will end with the June 2026 release, after which all instances must upgrade to PostgreSQL 16.
SourceRelated pages
More on TimescaleDB
Other head to heads
- CosmosDB vs Amazon Aurora
- CosmosDB vs Cockroach Labs
- CosmosDB vs Airtable
- CosmosDB vs PostgreSQL
- CosmosDB vs Google Cloud SQL
- CosmosDB vs ArangoDB
- CosmosDB vs DataStax
- CosmosDB vs FaunaDB
- CosmosDB vs Firebolt
- CosmosDB vs turbopuffer
- CosmosDB vs VerneMQ
- CosmosDB vs Vespa
- CosmosDB vs Xata
- CosmosDB vs YugabyteDB
- CosmosDB vs Zilliz
- CosmosDB vs Amazon Redshift
- CosmosDB vs BigQuery
- CosmosDB vs Amazon RDS
- CosmosDB vs QuestDB
- CosmosDB vs ClickHouse
- CosmosDB vs MotherDuck
- CosmosDB vs Apache Druid
- CosmosDB vs SingleStore
- CosmosDB vs DuckDB
- CosmosDB vs Elasticsearch
- CosmosDB vs Dgraph
- CosmosDB vs Dragonfly
- CosmosDB vs Dremio
- CosmosDB vs Fivetran HVR
- CosmosDB vs Grist
- CosmosDB vs IBM Db2
- CosmosDB vs Apache Pinot
- CosmosDB vs Apache Flink
- TimescaleDB vs Amazon Aurora
- TimescaleDB vs Cockroach Labs
- TimescaleDB vs Airtable
- TimescaleDB vs PostgreSQL
- TimescaleDB vs Google Cloud SQL
- TimescaleDB vs ArangoDB
- TimescaleDB vs DataStax
- TimescaleDB vs FaunaDB
- TimescaleDB vs Firebolt
- TimescaleDB vs turbopuffer
- TimescaleDB vs VerneMQ
- TimescaleDB vs Vespa
- TimescaleDB vs Xata
- TimescaleDB vs YugabyteDB
- TimescaleDB vs Zilliz
- TimescaleDB vs Amazon Redshift
- TimescaleDB vs BigQuery
- TimescaleDB vs Amazon RDS
- TimescaleDB vs QuestDB
- TimescaleDB vs ClickHouse
- TimescaleDB vs MotherDuck
- TimescaleDB vs Apache Druid
- TimescaleDB vs SingleStore
- TimescaleDB vs DuckDB
- TimescaleDB vs Elasticsearch
- TimescaleDB vs Dgraph
- TimescaleDB vs Dragonfly
- TimescaleDB vs Dremio
- TimescaleDB vs Fivetran HVR
- TimescaleDB vs Grist
- TimescaleDB vs IBM Db2
- TimescaleDB vs Apache Pinot
- TimescaleDB vs Apache Flink
