No-Code · head to head
Corteza vs Memcached

Corteza
No-Code
Apache-licensed open source low-code platform, formerly Crust, positioned against Salesforce
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
Memcached
Databases
Distributed memory object caching system
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Both are free.
- Only Corteza lists Corteza Low Code; only Memcached lists in-memory key-value cache.
- Where Memcached falls short: no persistence at all: restart a node and its cache is gone, which every design must assume.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Corteza and Memcached actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Corteza
- Corteza Low Code
- Automation and workflow
- Bundled CRM
- Case management
- Federation
- Role-based access control
- Corteza Messaging and integrations
- Self-hosted deployment
Only in Memcached
- In-memory key-value cache
- Multithreaded
- Client-side sharding
- Predictable memory use
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Corteza
- A European public body that needs a case management system on servers inside its own jurisdiction with an auditable licence and no per-seat vendor feenot Memcached
- An NGO replacing a Salesforce donation that has run out, needing to keep the data model but remove the recurring costnot Memcached
- An integrator building a regulated vertical application it intends to resell, requiring a permissive licence it can ship commerciallynot Memcached
- A mid-size European company that wants one platform for internal applications and a sales pipeline without paying per seat as headcount growsnot Memcached
Memcached
- Caching expensive database query results to cut loadnot Corteza
- Session storage where losing sessions on restart is acceptablenot Corteza
- Fronting an API whose responses are costly and change slowlynot Corteza
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Corteza
- Planet Crust is a small company of roughly a dozen or so people, so the entire commercial support capability behind Corteza is thin and a large deployment can outgrow the vendors ability to respond
- No pricing is published for Planet Crusts support, hosting or implementation services, so the true running cost of a supported deployment cannot be estimated without a sales conversation
- The connector ecosystem is small compared with commercial low-code platforms, so integrations with common SaaS tools usually mean writing against the REST API rather than installing something
- Hiring is hard: almost nobody has Corteza on a CV, so you are training internal developers on a niche platform and you cannot easily replace them
- The bundled CRM is a starting point rather than a mature product, and teams that expect Salesforce-equivalent sales functionality out of the box will spend months building the gap themselves
Memcached
- No persistence at all: restart a node and its cache is gone, which every design must assume
- No replication or failover, so losing a node loses that share of the cache
- Only simple key-value, with none of the lists, sorted sets or streams Redis offers
- Values are capped at 1MB by default, which surprises teams caching large documents
Pricing, plan by plan
Corteza
Free- Corteza communityFree
- Apache 2.0 licensed with no feature gating
- Low-code builder, workflow engine, CRM and case management included
- Self-hosted on your own infrastructure
- Planet Crust support and servicesOn request
- Commercial support, hosting and implementation from Planet Crust
- Custom application development
- Training
Memcached
Free- MemcachedFree
- Full functionality
- Self-hosted
- No usage limits
Which should you pick?
Choose Corteza if
- You need corteza low code.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want automation and workflow.
Choose Memcached if
- You need in-memory key-value cache.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Self-hosted.
- You also want multithreaded.
Questions people ask
- Is Corteza or Memcached better?
- Neither clearly leads. Corteza starts at Free and Memcached at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Corteza or Memcached?
- Corteza starts at Free and Memcached at Free.
- Does Corteza or Memcached run on more platforms?
- Corteza runs on Web, Linux, Self-hosted. Memcached runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Corteza for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Corteza best used for?
- Corteza is most often used for a european public body that needs a case management system on servers inside its own jurisdiction with an auditable licence and no per-seat vendor fee, an ngo replacing a salesforce donation that has run out, needing to keep the data model but remove the recurring cost, an integrator building a regulated vertical application it intends to resell, requiring a permissive licence it can ship commercially, a mid-size european company that wants one platform for internal applications and a sales pipeline without paying per seat as headcount grows. Of those, a european public body that needs a case management system on servers inside its own jurisdiction with an auditable licence and no per-seat vendor fee and an ngo replacing a salesforce donation that has run out, needing to keep the data model but remove the recurring cost are not what Memcached is typically brought in for.
- What can Corteza do that Memcached cannot?
- Corteza covers Corteza Low Code, Automation and workflow, Bundled CRM, Case management. Memcached covers In-memory key-value cache, Multithreaded, Client-side sharding, Predictable memory use.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Corteza: Is Corteza the same thing as Crust?
Yes. The project was branded Crust and renamed Corteza in 2019 when Crust Technology donated it to the Commons Conservancy.
Memcached: Is Memcached free?
Yes, open source with no licence fee.
Corteza: Who owns the code?
The Commons Conservancy, a Dutch foundation. Planet Crust in Cork is the primary developer and sells commercial services around it.
Memcached: Memcached or Redis?
Memcached is a pure cache: simpler, multithreaded and very predictable. Redis adds persistence, replication and rich data structures, which is why it is the default choice unless you specifically want a cache and nothing more.
Corteza: Is there a paid enterprise edition?
No. Corteza is Apache 2.0 with no feature gating. Planet Crust sells support, hosting and development instead of a restricted edition.
Memcached: Does Memcached persist data?
No. Everything is in memory and lost on restart, by design.
Corteza: Can it genuinely replace Salesforce?
For case management and a straightforward sales pipeline on a self-hosted footprint, yes. For a large sales organisation relying on AppExchange products and a mature ecosystem, no.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Corteza vs Appsmith
- Corteza vs ToolJet
- Corteza vs Zoho Creator
- Corteza vs Appian
- Corteza vs Momen
- Corteza vs Kintone
- Corteza vs Mendix
- Corteza vs OutSystems
- Corteza vs Noloco
- Corteza vs WeWeb
- Corteza vs Directual
- Corteza vs Draftbit
- Corteza vs Glide
- Corteza vs Adalo
- Corteza vs Bubble
- Corteza vs AppSheet
- Corteza vs Caspio
- Corteza vs FlutterFlow
- Corteza vs Redis
- Corteza vs Dragonfly
- Corteza vs Valkey
- Corteza vs Readyset
- Corteza vs PostgreSQL
- Corteza vs DuckDB
- Corteza vs DynamoDB
- Corteza vs NATS
- Corteza vs Apache Pulsar
- Corteza vs Presto
- Corteza vs Timeplus
- Corteza vs DataGrip
- Corteza vs Amazon RDS
- Corteza vs Apache Kafka
- Corteza vs Amazon Redshift
- Corteza vs Apache Pinot
- Corteza vs Cassandra
- Corteza vs CouchDB
- Memcached vs Appsmith
- Memcached vs ToolJet
- Memcached vs Zoho Creator
- Memcached vs Appian
- Memcached vs Momen
- Memcached vs Kintone
- Memcached vs Mendix
- Memcached vs OutSystems
- Memcached vs Noloco
- Memcached vs WeWeb
- Memcached vs Directual
- Memcached vs Draftbit
- Memcached vs Glide
- Memcached vs Adalo
- Memcached vs Bubble
- Memcached vs AppSheet
- Memcached vs Caspio
- Memcached vs FlutterFlow
- Memcached vs Redis
- Memcached vs Dragonfly
- Memcached vs Valkey
- Memcached vs Readyset
- Memcached vs PostgreSQL
- Memcached vs DuckDB
- Memcached vs DynamoDB
- Memcached vs NATS
- Memcached vs Apache Pulsar
- Memcached vs Presto
- Memcached vs Timeplus
- Memcached vs DataGrip
- Memcached vs Amazon RDS
- Memcached vs Apache Kafka
- Memcached vs Amazon Redshift
- Memcached vs Apache Pinot
- Memcached vs Cassandra
- Memcached vs CouchDB
