Databases · head to head
Amazon Redshift vs Memcached

Amazon Redshift
Databases
Fast, scalable cloud data warehouse from AWS
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Amazon Redshift on-demand pricing runs up to 75% higher than competitors like Snowflake and BigQuery; Memcached no persistence at all: restart a node and its cache is gone, which every design must assume
- They diverge on capability: Amazon Redshift covers Columnar Storage, Memcached covers In-memory key-value cache.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Amazon Redshift and Memcached actually diverge.
| Attribute | Amazon Redshift | Memcached |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | Open source, no licence fee; managed cloud billed separately |
| Platforms | Web | Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Self-hosted |
| Founded | 2012 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Amazon Redshift
- Columnar Storage
- Massively Parallel
- Machine Learning
- AQUA Acceleration
- Data Sharing
- Federated Query
- Concurrency Scaling
- S3
Only in Memcached
- In-memory key-value cache
- Multithreaded
- Client-side sharding
- Predictable memory use
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Amazon Redshift
- Business intelligencenot Memcached
- Data warehousingnot Memcached
- Real-time analyticsnot Memcached
- Reportingnot Memcached
- Machine learningnot Memcached
Memcached
- Caching expensive database query results to cut loadnot Amazon Redshift
- Session storage where losing sessions on restart is acceptablenot Amazon Redshift
- Fronting an API whose responses are costly and change slowlynot Amazon Redshift
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Amazon Redshift
- On-demand pricing runs up to 75% higher than competitors like Snowflake and BigQuery
- Requires significant manual tuning including managing concurrency scaling costs and configuring Workload Management queues
- Performance degrades without proper design of distribution keys and sort keys
- Limited elastic resize options - can only halve or double current cluster size
- AWS lock-in makes it unsuitable for multi-cloud architectures
Memcached
- No persistence at all: restart a node and its cache is gone, which every design must assume
- No replication or failover, so losing a node loses that share of the cache
- Only simple key-value, with none of the lists, sorted sets or streams Redis offers
- Values are capped at 1MB by default, which surprises teams caching large documents
Pricing, plan by plan
Amazon Redshift
Free- Free TrialFree
- 750 DC2.Large hours
- 2 months free
- Full features
- On-Demand$0.25/hour
- Pay per node hour
- All features
- Standard support
Memcached
Free- MemcachedFree
- Full functionality
- Self-hosted
- No usage limits
Which should you pick?
Choose Amazon Redshift if
- You need columnar storage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want massively parallel.
Choose Memcached if
- You need in-memory key-value cache.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Self-hosted.
- You also want multithreaded.
Questions people ask
- Is Amazon Redshift or Memcached better?
- Neither clearly leads. Amazon Redshift starts at Free and Memcached at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Amazon Redshift or Memcached?
- Amazon Redshift starts at Free and Memcached at Free.
- Does Amazon Redshift or Memcached run on more platforms?
- Amazon Redshift runs on Web. Memcached runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Amazon Redshift for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Amazon Redshift best used for?
- Amazon Redshift is most often used for business intelligence, data warehousing, real-time analytics, reporting. Of those, business intelligence and data warehousing are not what Memcached is typically brought in for.
- What can Amazon Redshift do that Memcached cannot?
- Amazon Redshift covers Columnar Storage, Massively Parallel, Machine Learning, AQUA Acceleration. Memcached covers In-memory key-value cache, Multithreaded, Client-side sharding, Predictable memory use.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Amazon Redshift: What deployment options does Amazon Redshift offer?
Redshift offers Provisioned Cluster (with RA3 or DC2 nodes) and Serverless options to match varying workloads. The new Redshift RG instance family, powered by Graviton, delivers 2.4x faster performance than RA3 at 30% lower cost per vCPU.
SourceMemcached: Is Memcached free?
Yes, open source with no licence fee.
Amazon Redshift: What does Amazon Redshift cost?
Provisioned cluster pricing: RA3 on-demand starts at $1.086/hour for ra3.xlplus. Serverless costs approximately $0.375 per RPU-hour with 4-RPU minimum (roughly $1.50/hour active workload). Managed storage costs $0.024/GB-month.
SourceMemcached: Memcached or Redis?
Memcached is a pure cache: simpler, multithreaded and very predictable. Redis adds persistence, replication and rich data structures, which is why it is the default choice unless you specifically want a cache and nothing more.
Amazon Redshift: Does Redshift work with data lakes?
Yes, Redshift's integrated data lake query engine processes workloads on Apache Iceberg tables and other supported formats in Amazon S3, allowing you to run SQL analytics across your data warehouse and data lake from the same engine.
SourceMemcached: Does Memcached persist data?
No. Everything is in memory and lost on restart, by design.
Amazon Redshift: Is there a free tier for Amazon Redshift?
AWS offers a free trial with $300 USD in Serverless credits valid for 90 days, but Redshift is not part of the permanent AWS Free Tier.
SourceRelated pages
More on Amazon Redshift
Other head to heads
- Amazon Redshift vs BigQuery
- Amazon Redshift vs Firebolt
- Amazon Redshift vs ClickHouse
- Amazon Redshift vs MotherDuck
- Amazon Redshift vs Azure SQL
- Amazon Redshift vs TiDB
- Amazon Redshift vs Apache Druid
- Amazon Redshift vs TimescaleDB
- Amazon Redshift vs QuestDB
- Amazon Redshift vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Amazon Redshift vs Timeplus
- Amazon Redshift vs turbopuffer
- Amazon Redshift vs VerneMQ
- Amazon Redshift vs Vespa
- Amazon Redshift vs Xata
- Amazon Redshift vs Google Cloud SQL
- Amazon Redshift vs CosmosDB
- Amazon Redshift vs Apache Pinot
- Amazon Redshift vs Dragonfly
- Amazon Redshift vs Valkey
- Amazon Redshift vs Readyset
- Amazon Redshift vs PostgreSQL
- Amazon Redshift vs DuckDB
- Amazon Redshift vs DynamoDB
- Amazon Redshift vs NATS
- Amazon Redshift vs Apache Pulsar
- Amazon Redshift vs Presto
- Amazon Redshift vs RabbitMQ
- Amazon Redshift vs EMQX
- Amazon Redshift vs FaunaDB
- Amazon Redshift vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Amazon Redshift vs Neo4j
- Amazon Redshift vs Apache Kafka
- Amazon Redshift vs Firestore
- Memcached vs BigQuery
- Memcached vs Firebolt
- Memcached vs ClickHouse
- Memcached vs MotherDuck
- Memcached vs Azure SQL
- Memcached vs TiDB
- Memcached vs Apache Druid
- Memcached vs TimescaleDB
- Memcached vs QuestDB
- Memcached vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Memcached vs Timeplus
- Memcached vs turbopuffer
- Memcached vs VerneMQ
- Memcached vs Vespa
- Memcached vs Xata
- Memcached vs Google Cloud SQL
- Memcached vs CosmosDB
- Memcached vs Apache Pinot
- Memcached vs Dragonfly
- Memcached vs Valkey
- Memcached vs Readyset
- Memcached vs PostgreSQL
- Memcached vs DuckDB
- Memcached vs DynamoDB
- Memcached vs NATS
- Memcached vs Apache Pulsar
- Memcached vs Presto
- Memcached vs RabbitMQ
- Memcached vs EMQX
- Memcached vs FaunaDB
- Memcached vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Memcached vs Neo4j
- Memcached vs Apache Kafka
- Memcached vs Firestore
