Cortezavs
Budibase


Budibase: If you want an open source low-code builder with a simpler learning curve and a commercial cloud tier with published pricing

Apache-licensed open source low-code platform, formerly Crust, positioned against Salesforce
As of 31 August 2026, Corteza is free to use. A self-hostable low-code platform with a bundled CRM and case management app, owned by a Dutch foundation rather than by its main developer. Softwr lists it under No-Code. Corteza is made by Planet Crust (code owned by The Commons Conservancy), available on Web, Linux, Self-hosted, Docker.
Overview
Corteza is an open source low-code platform for building business applications: a data modelling layer, a drag-and-drop page builder, a workflow and automation engine, role-based access control, and a federation feature for sharing data models between separate Corteza instances. It ships with pre-built applications including a CRM, case management and service desk, so it can be deployed as a working system rather than as an empty toolkit. It was previously branded Crust and renamed Corteza in 2019. The ownership structure is what distinguishes it commercially. Crust Technology donated the project to the Commons Conservancy, a Dutch foundation, so the code is held by an independent body under Apache 2.0 while Planet Crust, an Irish company in Cork, remains the primary developer and sells support and services. This is not the usual open core arrangement: there is no proprietary enterprise edition holding back features, and the foundation ownership makes the licence bait-and-switch that has hit several open source competitors structurally difficult. For a public sector or regulated buyer with a long horizon, that governance is often the deciding factor rather than any feature. Buyers are public bodies, NGOs and mid-size European organisations that need data residency and want to avoid Salesforce licensing, plus integrators building vertical applications on a base they can ship. The trade-off is that Planet Crust is a small company, no pricing is published for its services, and the ecosystem around Corteza is thin: few third-party connectors, a small pool of developers who know it, and documentation that assumes you are comfortable with Docker and Go.
The honest half
Concrete and checkable, so you can decide whether any of them matter to you. This is the half of a review a vendor will not write about Corteza.
Cross-shopped
Each pairing was judged by two reviewers asking whether a buyer would genuinely weigh the two against each other. The ones that failed were deleted rather than published.


Budibase: If you want an open source low-code builder with a simpler learning curve and a commercial cloud tier with published pricing


Appsmith: If your requirement is internal tools over existing databases rather than a bundled CRM and case management suite


Odoo: If you want open source business applications that already work out of the box rather than a platform you must build on
Pricing
Taken from the vendor's own pricing page. Prices move, so check before you buy.
Corteza community
Free
Planet Crust support and services
On request
Capabilities
Corteza Low Code
Visual data modeller, page builder and record management for building applications without code
Automation and workflow
Visual workflow designer plus server-side scripting in JavaScript and Corredor scripts
Bundled CRM
A working CRM application supplied as a Corteza namespace you can modify freely
Case management
Service desk and case handling application included in the distribution
Federation
Share and consume data models across separate Corteza deployments without merging databases
Role-based access control
Permission rules down to individual records, fields and buttons
Corteza Messaging and integrations
Webhooks, REST API and connectors for wiring into external systems
Self-hosted deployment
Docker and Kubernetes deployment on your own infrastructure with PostgreSQL
Apache 2.0 licence
Permissive licence with no feature gating or open core split
Foundation ownership
Code held by the Commons Conservancy, separate from the commercial developer
Answered, with sources
Each answer names the page it came from, so you can check it rather than take our word for it.
Yes. The project was branded Crust and renamed Corteza in 2019 when Crust Technology donated it to the Commons Conservancy.
The Commons Conservancy, a Dutch foundation. Planet Crust in Cork is the primary developer and sells commercial services around it.
No. Corteza is Apache 2.0 with no feature gating. Planet Crust sells support, hosting and development instead of a restricted edition.
For case management and a straightforward sales pipeline on a self-hosted footprint, yes. For a large sales organisation relying on AppExchange products and a mature ecosystem, no.
Keep looking
Open-source low-code platform for building internal tools and business apps
Low-code app builder priced per user per month, bundled into the wider Zoho ecosystem
Low-code process automation platform priced per user, per app, per month, with tier limits on data and AI volume
Full-stack web app builder with its own Postgres database and a GraphQL API over your tables
Customizable workplace platform by Cybozu for no-code data, task and team management
Siemens-owned low-code platform priced by app count, with cloud infrastructure billed separately
Enterprise low-code platform priced by application complexity units, not just users
Client portals and internal tools built over data you already have
Front-end builder for applications whose data already lives somewhere else
No-code backend with a visual workflow engine, used behind other tools rather than instead of them
Visual builder for React Native apps that exports the source code you keep
Permissioned portals over data that stays in Airtable, Salesforce or Postgres
No-code, drag-and-drop mobile app builder priced by AI tokens and project counts
No-code application platform with published per-user pricing and enforced minimum seat counts
Enterprise low-code platform priced by application complexity units, not just users
Client portals and internal tools built over data you already have
Softwr does not host reviews and shows no star rating for Corteza, because a rating we did not collect is not ours to publish. What is here is the pricing and platform detail from the vendor’s own pages, limitations we could state concretely, and alternatives a reviewer confirmed people weigh against it. Tell us if any of it is wrong.
What people switch to, and what they give up
Every tier, and where the cost actually lands
Put it head to head with anything we hold
Its rating, and an embed for your own site
No-code application platform with published per-user pricing and enforced minimum seat counts
Per user per month, billed annually, with an enforced minimum seat count per tierEnterprise low-code platform priced by application complexity units, not just users
Application Object consumption plus internal and external user packsNo-code, drag-and-drop mobile app builder priced by AI tokens and project counts
Per month, tiered by AI token allowance and project countLow-code app builder priced per user per month, bundled into the wider Zoho ecosystem
Per user per month, billed annuallyNo-code database app platform charging by data records and DataPages rather than by user seats
Flat monthly fee by data record volume and DataPage count, unlimited users includedSiemens-owned low-code platform priced by app count, with cloud infrastructure billed separately
Per application tier (One App vs Unlimited Apps), cloud infrastructure billed separatelyLow-code process automation platform priced per user, per app, per month, with tier limits on data and AI volume
Per user, per app, per month, escalating across Standard, Advanced and Premium tiers