No-Code · head to head
Appsmith vs Memcached
Memcached
Databases
Distributed memory object caching system
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Memcached is free; Appsmith starts at $15/user/mo.
- Only Appsmith lists drag-and-drop builder; only Memcached lists in-memory key-value cache.
- Where Appsmith falls short: the free cloud tier is capped at 5 users, 5 workspaces and 3 Git repositories.
- Where Memcached falls short: no persistence at all: restart a node and its cache is gone, which every design must assume.
- Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Appsmith and Memcached actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes).
Not yet recorded: founded for Memcached.
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Appsmith
- Drag-and-drop builder
- Database integration
- REST API
- Workflows
- Authentication
- Custom code
- Git integration
- 100+ integrations
Only in Memcached
- In-memory key-value cache
- Multithreaded
- Client-side sharding
- Predictable memory use
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Appsmith
- Building internal admin panels over existing databases and APIsnot Memcached
- Self-hosting a low-code internal tool platformnot Memcached
- Custom CRUD dashboards for operations teamsnot Memcached
- Versioning applications through Gitnot Memcached
Memcached
- Caching expensive database query results to cut loadnot Appsmith
- Session storage where losing sessions on restart is acceptablenot Appsmith
- Fronting an API whose responses are costly and change slowlynot Appsmith
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Appsmith
- The free cloud tier is capped at 5 users, 5 workspaces and 3 Git repositories
- Workflows, custom roles and audit logs all require the Business plan at $15 per user per month
- SAML and OIDC single sign-on need Enterprise, which starts at $2,500 a month with a 100 user minimum
- Embedding an app privately is Enterprise only; the lower tiers embed publicly
- Managed hosting is an Enterprise add-on rather than an included option
Memcached
- No persistence at all: restart a node and its cache is gone, which every design must assume
- No replication or failover, so losing a node loses that share of the cache
- Only simple key-value, with none of the lists, sorted sets or streams Redis offers
- Values are capped at 1MB by default, which surprises teams caching large documents
Pricing, plan by plan
Appsmith
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 5 users on cloud
- 5 workspaces
- 3 Git repos
- Business$15/user/mo
- Up to 99 users
- Unlimited workspaces and Git repos
- Workflows and reusable packages
- Enterprise$2,500/mo
- Minimum 100 users
- Unlimited users above 100
- SAML/OIDC SSO
Memcached
Free- MemcachedFree
- Full functionality
- Self-hosted
- No usage limits
Which should you pick?
Choose Appsmith if
- You need drag-and-drop builder.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Self-hosted.
- You also want database integration.
Choose Memcached if
- You need in-memory key-value cache.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Self-hosted.
- You also want multithreaded.
Questions people ask
- Is Appsmith or Memcached better?
- Neither clearly leads. Appsmith starts at Free and Memcached at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Appsmith or Memcached?
- Appsmith starts at Free and Memcached at Free.
- Does Appsmith or Memcached run on more platforms?
- Appsmith runs on Web, Self-hosted. Memcached runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Appsmith for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Appsmith best used for?
- Appsmith is most often used for building internal admin panels over existing databases and apis, self-hosting a low-code internal tool platform, custom crud dashboards for operations teams, versioning applications through git. Of those, building internal admin panels over existing databases and apis and self-hosting a low-code internal tool platform are not what Memcached is typically brought in for.
- What can Appsmith do that Memcached cannot?
- Appsmith covers Drag-and-drop builder, Database integration, REST API, Workflows. Memcached covers In-memory key-value cache, Multithreaded, Client-side sharding, Predictable memory use.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Appsmith: How much does Appsmith cost?
Appsmith offers a free plan for up to 5 users, a Business plan at $15 per user per month (up to 99 users), and an Enterprise plan starting at $2,500 per month for a minimum of 100 users with unlimited users available at that rate.
SourceMemcached: Is Memcached free?
Yes, open source with no licence fee.
Appsmith: Does Appsmith have a free version?
Yes, Appsmith's Free plan provides access for up to 5 users with 5 workspaces, 3 Git repos, and community support at no cost. All plans offer unlimited apps.
SourceMemcached: Memcached or Redis?
Memcached is a pure cache: simpler, multithreaded and very predictable. Redis adds persistence, replication and rich data structures, which is why it is the default choice unless you specifically want a cache and nothing more.
Appsmith: What does the Business plan include compared to Free?
The Business plan at $15 per user per month supports up to 99 users, provides unlimited workspaces and Git repos, includes workflows and reusable packages, premium integrations, custom roles, and access controls with email and chat support compared to the Free plan's community support only.
SourceMemcached: Does Memcached persist data?
No. Everything is in memory and lost on restart, by design.
Appsmith: How are Appsmith users counted for billing purposes?
Appsmith counts any user who builds or edits applications as a standard user for billing. Developers and builders are treated the same as other users and all users count toward the per-user billing model without separate developer seat charges.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Appsmith vs Corteza
- Appsmith vs Glide
- Appsmith vs AppSheet
- Appsmith vs Kintone
- Appsmith vs ToolJet
- Appsmith vs Pabbly Connect
- Appsmith vs Softr
- Appsmith vs Noloco
- Appsmith vs Superblocks
- Appsmith vs Stacker
- Appsmith vs Draftbit
- Appsmith vs Adalo
- Appsmith vs OutSystems
- Appsmith vs Quickbase
- Appsmith vs Lovable
- Appsmith vs WeWeb
- Appsmith vs Whalesync
- Appsmith vs Directual
- Appsmith vs Redis
- Appsmith vs Dragonfly
- Appsmith vs Valkey
- Appsmith vs Readyset
- Appsmith vs PostgreSQL
- Appsmith vs DuckDB
- Appsmith vs DynamoDB
- Appsmith vs NATS
- Appsmith vs Apache Pulsar
- Appsmith vs Presto
- Appsmith vs Timeplus
- Appsmith vs DataGrip
- Appsmith vs Amazon RDS
- Appsmith vs Apache Kafka
- Appsmith vs Amazon Redshift
- Appsmith vs Apache Pinot
- Appsmith vs Cassandra
- Appsmith vs CouchDB
- Memcached vs Corteza
- Memcached vs Glide
- Memcached vs AppSheet
- Memcached vs Kintone
- Memcached vs ToolJet
- Memcached vs Pabbly Connect
- Memcached vs Softr
- Memcached vs Noloco
- Memcached vs Superblocks
- Memcached vs Stacker
- Memcached vs Draftbit
- Memcached vs Adalo
- Memcached vs OutSystems
- Memcached vs Quickbase
- Memcached vs Lovable
- Memcached vs WeWeb
- Memcached vs Whalesync
- Memcached vs Directual
- Memcached vs Redis
- Memcached vs Dragonfly
- Memcached vs Valkey
- Memcached vs Readyset
- Memcached vs PostgreSQL
- Memcached vs DuckDB
- Memcached vs DynamoDB
- Memcached vs NATS
- Memcached vs Apache Pulsar
- Memcached vs Presto
- Memcached vs Timeplus
- Memcached vs DataGrip
- Memcached vs Amazon RDS
- Memcached vs Apache Kafka
- Memcached vs Amazon Redshift
- Memcached vs Apache Pinot
- Memcached vs Cassandra
- Memcached vs CouchDB

