APIs · head to head
Convoy vs Trustly

Convoy
APIs
Open source webhooks gateway you self-host, handling both sending and receiving
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Trustly
APIs
Pay-by-bank payments network, majority-owned by private equity firm Nordic Capital
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Convoy has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Convoy the default deployment is self-hosted, so you operate Convoy plus Postgres and Redis and carry the on-call burden for the system that delivers your customers' events.; Trustly it is majority-owned by Nordic Capital, a private equity firm, so its long-term roadmap is ultimately oriented toward an eventual sale or IPO rather than indefinite independent operation.
- They diverge on capability: Convoy covers Inbound and outbound, Trustly covers Pay by bank checkout.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Convoy and Trustly actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Convoy
- Inbound and outbound
- Broker-driven ingestion
- Payload transformation
- Portal links
- Circuit breaking
- Retry policies
- OpenTelemetry export
- Role-based access control
Only in Trustly
- Pay by bank checkout
- Instant refunds
- Verified payouts
- Multi-market bank connectivity
- Merchant dashboard and reconciliation
- Fraud and risk tooling
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Convoy
- A fintech that cannot route customer webhook traffic through a third-party SaaS for compliance reasonsnot Trustly
- A high-volume platform for which per-message webhook pricing costs more than the flat premium licencenot Trustly
- A team that also receives webhooks from many providers and wants ingestion, verification and deduplication in the same gatewaynot Trustly
- An engineering group that wants webhook delivery driven directly from an existing Kafka or SQS topicnot Trustly
Trustly
- An e-commerce merchant wanting a lower-cost alternative or complement to card payment acceptancenot Convoy
- A gaming or gambling operator needing verified, instant payouts to players' bank accountsnot Convoy
- A merchant wanting instant refunds processed directly to a customer's bank account rather than card reversal delaysnot Convoy
- A business in a market with strong open banking adoption wanting pay-by-bank as a checkout optionnot Convoy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Convoy
- The default deployment is self-hosted, so you operate Convoy plus Postgres and Redis and carry the on-call burden for the system that delivers your customers' events.
- Frain Technologies is a small startup, and putting customer-facing delivery infrastructure on it means accepting real vendor continuity risk on a component that is hard to swap out quickly.
- The premium tier at a flat 999 US dollars a month is poor value below substantial volume, while the community edition omits the portal, transformations and RBAC that most production deployments end up wanting.
- The hosted cloud trial is capped at one project and 100 events a day, which is too small to properly evaluate the service before committing.
- Documentation and the third-party ecosystem are thinner than the established webhook services, so unusual configurations often mean reading the Go source.
Trustly
- It is majority-owned by Nordic Capital, a private equity firm, so its long-term roadmap is ultimately oriented toward an eventual sale or IPO rather than indefinite independent operation.
- Consumer familiarity with paying by bank transfer still lags card payments in most markets, so merchants typically see it used as a secondary option rather than a full card replacement.
- The 1.15 to 3.15% merchant fee range is not a single published rate, so a merchant cannot know its actual cost without a sales negotiation.
- As with all open banking-dependent payment methods, reliability depends on the consistency of the underlying banks' own APIs, which Trustly does not control.
- Its verified payout functionality is heavily used in gaming and gambling, a sector with additional regulatory scrutiny, which is worth factoring in when evaluating vendor risk exposure by association.
Pricing, plan by plan
Convoy
Free- CommunityFree
- Self-hosted open source gateway
- Inbound and outbound webhooks
- Automatic retries and message broker support
- Premium$999/month
- Flat rate irrespective of message volume
- Portal links and payload transformation
- RBAC, circuit breaking and white labelling
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- SAML SSO
- Dedicated support with SLA
- On-premises deployment assistance
- Cloud$undefined/month
- Hosted by Convoy
- 14 day trial limited to one project and 100 events a day
- Usage-based tiers above the trial
Trustly
On request- Trustly$undefined/month
- Typical merchant cost of 1.15% to 3.15% depending on volume and market
- Exact rate negotiated per merchant, not published as a flat card
Which should you pick?
Choose Convoy if
- You need inbound and outbound.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- You also want broker-driven ingestion.
Choose Trustly if
- You need pay by bank checkout.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want instant refunds.
Questions people ask
- Is Convoy or Trustly better?
- Neither clearly leads. Convoy starts at Free and Trustly at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Convoy or Trustly?
- Convoy has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Convoy and On request for Trustly.
- Does Convoy or Trustly run on more platforms?
- Convoy runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud. Trustly runs on Web, API.
- Can I use Convoy for free?
- Yes. Convoy has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Trustly starts at On request.
- What is Convoy best used for?
- Convoy is most often used for a fintech that cannot route customer webhook traffic through a third-party saas for compliance reasons, a high-volume platform for which per-message webhook pricing costs more than the flat premium licence, a team that also receives webhooks from many providers and wants ingestion, verification and deduplication in the same gateway, an engineering group that wants webhook delivery driven directly from an existing kafka or sqs topic. Of those, a fintech that cannot route customer webhook traffic through a third-party saas for compliance reasons and a high-volume platform for which per-message webhook pricing costs more than the flat premium licence are not what Trustly is typically brought in for.
- What can Convoy do that Trustly cannot?
- Convoy covers Inbound and outbound, Broker-driven ingestion, Payload transformation, Portal links. Trustly covers Pay by bank checkout, Instant refunds, Verified payouts, Multi-market bank connectivity.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Convoy: Is Convoy really open source?
Yes, the community edition is open source and self-hostable, covering both inbound and outbound webhooks with retries.
Trustly: Who owns Trustly?
Nordic Capital, a private equity firm, holds a 51.1% majority stake; Alfven & Didrikson and BlackRock hold smaller stakes.
Convoy: What does premium cost?
A flat 999 US dollars a month, self-hosted, regardless of message volume.
Trustly: Is Trustly going public?
It has discussed an IPO but as of its most recent comments said one remained at least a year away.
Convoy: Does it receive webhooks as well as send them?
Yes, inbound ingestion with verification and deduplication is a first-class feature, unlike most webhook services.
Trustly: What does it typically cost a merchant?
Roughly 1.15% to 3.15% of transaction value depending on volume and market, negotiated per merchant.
Convoy: Do I have to self-host?
No, there is a hosted cloud, but the trial is capped at 100 events a day and self-hosting is the primary model.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Convoy vs Kong
- Convoy vs Svix
- Convoy vs Tyk
- Convoy vs Janus Gateway
- Convoy vs Appwrite
- Convoy vs Gravitee
- Convoy vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Convoy vs Formance
- Convoy vs AWS API Gateway
- Convoy vs Hasura
- Convoy vs PocketBase
- Convoy vs Sensedia
- Convoy vs Sila
- Convoy vs Swagger
- Convoy vs TIBCO Mashery
- Convoy vs Zeplo
- Convoy vs Kong Gateway
- Convoy vs Yapily
- Convoy vs Aiia
- Convoy vs Swan
- Convoy vs Volt
- Convoy vs TrueLayer
- Convoy vs Token.io
- Convoy vs Tink
- Convoy vs Brite Payments
- Convoy vs Dwolla
- Convoy vs Zimpler
- Convoy vs Salt Edge
- Convoy vs Yodlee
- Convoy vs Stainless
- Convoy vs Strapi
- Convoy vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Convoy vs Thredd
- Convoy vs Thunder Client
- Convoy vs Toqio
- Trustly vs Kong
- Trustly vs Svix
- Trustly vs Tyk
- Trustly vs Janus Gateway
- Trustly vs Appwrite
- Trustly vs Gravitee
- Trustly vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Trustly vs Formance
- Trustly vs AWS API Gateway
- Trustly vs Hasura
- Trustly vs PocketBase
- Trustly vs Sensedia
- Trustly vs Sila
- Trustly vs Swagger
- Trustly vs TIBCO Mashery
- Trustly vs Zeplo
- Trustly vs Kong Gateway
- Trustly vs Yapily
- Trustly vs Aiia
- Trustly vs Swan
- Trustly vs Volt
- Trustly vs TrueLayer
- Trustly vs Token.io
- Trustly vs Tink
- Trustly vs Brite Payments
- Trustly vs Dwolla
- Trustly vs Zimpler
- Trustly vs Salt Edge
- Trustly vs Yodlee
- Trustly vs Stainless
- Trustly vs Strapi
- Trustly vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Trustly vs Thredd
- Trustly vs Thunder Client
- Trustly vs Toqio
