APIs · head to head
Convoy vs Svix

Convoy
APIs
Open source webhooks gateway you self-host, handling both sending and receiving
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Svix
APIs
Outbound webhook sending as a service, with retries, signing and a customer-facing portal
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Convoy the default deployment is self-hosted, so you operate Convoy plus Postgres and Redis and carry the on-call burden for the system that delivers your customers' events.; Svix the Professional tier at 490 US dollars a month includes the same 50,000 messages as the free tier, so the upgrade buys SLA, throughput and retention rather than volume, which is a jarring step for a growing product.
- They diverge on capability: Convoy covers Inbound and outbound, Svix covers Automatic retries.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Convoy and Svix actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Convoy
- Inbound and outbound
- Broker-driven ingestion
- Payload transformation
- Portal links
- Circuit breaking
- Retry policies
- OpenTelemetry export
- Role-based access control
Only in Svix
- Automatic retries
- Payload signing
- Consumer portal
- Event types and filtering
- Delivery logs and replay
- Rate limiting
- Static source IPs
- Language SDKs
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Convoy
- A fintech that cannot route customer webhook traffic through a third-party SaaS for compliance reasonsnot Svix
- A high-volume platform for which per-message webhook pricing costs more than the flat premium licencenot Svix
- A team that also receives webhooks from many providers and wants ingestion, verification and deduplication in the same gatewaynot Svix
- An engineering group that wants webhook delivery driven directly from an existing Kafka or SQS topicnot Svix
Svix
- A SaaS company adding webhooks to its API that does not want to build retry, signing and a customer debugging UI from scratchnot Convoy
- A payments or fintech product whose customers need signature verification libraries in several languages they did not writenot Convoy
- An engineering team drowning in support tickets from customers whose endpoints silently failed and who need self-service delivery logsnot Convoy
- A platform with a small number of very slow customer endpoints that must not delay deliveries to everyone elsenot Convoy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Convoy
- The default deployment is self-hosted, so you operate Convoy plus Postgres and Redis and carry the on-call burden for the system that delivers your customers' events.
- Frain Technologies is a small startup, and putting customer-facing delivery infrastructure on it means accepting real vendor continuity risk on a component that is hard to swap out quickly.
- The premium tier at a flat 999 US dollars a month is poor value below substantial volume, while the community edition omits the portal, transformations and RBAC that most production deployments end up wanting.
- The hosted cloud trial is capped at one project and 100 events a day, which is too small to properly evaluate the service before committing.
- Documentation and the third-party ecosystem are thinner than the established webhook services, so unusual configurations often mean reading the Go source.
Svix
- The Professional tier at 490 US dollars a month includes the same 50,000 messages as the free tier, so the upgrade buys SLA, throughput and retention rather than volume, which is a jarring step for a growing product.
- Only attempted messages count toward usage, but a customer with many subscribed endpoints multiplies a single event into many billable messages, and forecasting that fan-out before launch is difficult.
- The open source server is MIT licensed but trails the hosted product in features, so self-hosting is a fallback position rather than a genuinely equivalent option.
- Routing outbound customer traffic through a third party puts a vendor in the delivery path for events your customers may treat as contractual, which some security reviews will not accept.
- Payload retention is 30 days on the free tier and 90 on Professional, so anyone needing longer delivery history for audit must pay for Enterprise or log independently.
Pricing, plan by plan
Convoy
Free- CommunityFree
- Self-hosted open source gateway
- Inbound and outbound webhooks
- Automatic retries and message broker support
- Premium$999/month
- Flat rate irrespective of message volume
- Portal links and payload transformation
- RBAC, circuit breaking and white labelling
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- SAML SSO
- Dedicated support with SLA
- On-premises deployment assistance
- Cloud$undefined/month
- Hosted by Convoy
- 14 day trial limited to one project and 100 events a day
- Usage-based tiers above the trial
Svix
Free- FreeFree
- 50,000 messages a month included
- Overage at $0.0001 per message
- 99.9% uptime SLA
- Professional$490/month
- 50,000 messages included, same as free
- 99.99% uptime SLA
- 800 messages per second
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Custom volume and rate limits
- 99.999% uptime SLA
- Custom retention
Which should you pick?
Choose Convoy if
- You need inbound and outbound.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- You also want broker-driven ingestion.
Choose Svix if
- You need automatic retries.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Cloud, Docker.
- You also want payload signing.
Questions people ask
- Is Convoy or Svix better?
- Neither clearly leads. Convoy starts at Free and Svix at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Convoy or Svix?
- Convoy starts at Free and Svix at Free.
- Does Convoy or Svix run on more platforms?
- Convoy runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud. Svix runs on Web, Cloud, Docker.
- Can I use Convoy for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Convoy best used for?
- Convoy is most often used for a fintech that cannot route customer webhook traffic through a third-party saas for compliance reasons, a high-volume platform for which per-message webhook pricing costs more than the flat premium licence, a team that also receives webhooks from many providers and wants ingestion, verification and deduplication in the same gateway, an engineering group that wants webhook delivery driven directly from an existing kafka or sqs topic. Of those, a fintech that cannot route customer webhook traffic through a third-party saas for compliance reasons and a high-volume platform for which per-message webhook pricing costs more than the flat premium licence are not what Svix is typically brought in for.
- What can Convoy do that Svix cannot?
- Convoy covers Inbound and outbound, Broker-driven ingestion, Payload transformation, Portal links. Svix covers Automatic retries, Payload signing, Consumer portal, Event types and filtering.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Convoy: Is Convoy really open source?
Yes, the community edition is open source and self-hostable, covering both inbound and outbound webhooks with retries.
Svix: How much does Svix cost?
Free up to 50,000 messages a month; Professional starts at 490 US dollars a month with the same included volume but better SLA and throughput.
Convoy: What does premium cost?
A flat 999 US dollars a month, self-hosted, regardless of message volume.
Svix: Can I self-host it?
Yes, there is an MIT licensed server, but it lags the hosted service in features and has no SLA.
Convoy: Does it receive webhooks as well as send them?
Yes, inbound ingestion with verification and deduplication is a first-class feature, unlike most webhook services.
Svix: What counts as a message?
Attempted or transformed deliveries. Retries and messages filtered out because no endpoint subscribed are not charged.
Convoy: Do I have to self-host?
No, there is a hosted cloud, but the trial is capped at 100 events a day and self-hosting is the primary model.
Svix: Does it handle inbound webhooks?
Its focus is outbound sending on behalf of API providers, not receiving webhooks from third parties.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Convoy vs Kong
- Convoy vs Tyk
- Convoy vs Janus Gateway
- Convoy vs Appwrite
- Convoy vs Gravitee
- Convoy vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Convoy vs Formance
- Convoy vs AWS API Gateway
- Convoy vs Hasura
- Convoy vs PocketBase
- Convoy vs Sensedia
- Convoy vs Sila
- Convoy vs Swagger
- Convoy vs TIBCO Mashery
- Convoy vs Zeplo
- Convoy vs Kong Gateway
- Convoy vs Ably
- Convoy vs Pusher
- Convoy vs PubNub
- Convoy vs Apollo GraphQL
- Convoy vs Liveblocks
- Convoy vs Backbase
- Convoy vs Meniga
- Convoy vs Fintech Farm
- Convoy vs Moesif
- Convoy vs Sanity
- Convoy vs Tribe Payments
- Convoy vs Trustly
- Convoy vs Tuum
- Convoy vs Unit
- Convoy vs Vodeno
- Convoy vs Weavr
- Svix vs Kong
- Svix vs Tyk
- Svix vs Janus Gateway
- Svix vs Appwrite
- Svix vs Gravitee
- Svix vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Svix vs Formance
- Svix vs AWS API Gateway
- Svix vs Hasura
- Svix vs PocketBase
- Svix vs Sensedia
- Svix vs Sila
- Svix vs Swagger
- Svix vs TIBCO Mashery
- Svix vs Zeplo
- Svix vs Kong Gateway
- Svix vs Ably
- Svix vs Pusher
- Svix vs PubNub
- Svix vs Apollo GraphQL
- Svix vs Liveblocks
- Svix vs Backbase
- Svix vs Meniga
- Svix vs Fintech Farm
- Svix vs Moesif
- Svix vs Sanity
- Svix vs Tribe Payments
- Svix vs Trustly
- Svix vs Tuum
- Svix vs Unit
- Svix vs Vodeno
- Svix vs Weavr
