APIs · head to head
Convoy vs Volt

Convoy
APIs
Open source webhooks gateway you self-host, handling both sending and receiving
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Volt
APIs
Account-to-account pay by bank across Europe, the UK, Brazil and Australia
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Convoy has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Convoy the default deployment is self-hosted, so you operate Convoy plus Postgres and Redis and carry the on-call burden for the system that delivers your customers' events.; Volt account-to-account payments carry no chargeback mechanism, so consumers lose scheme dispute protection and merchants lose a familiar framework for handling claims.
- They diverge on capability: Convoy covers Inbound and outbound, Volt covers Pay by bank.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Convoy and Volt actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Convoy
- Inbound and outbound
- Broker-driven ingestion
- Payload transformation
- Portal links
- Circuit breaking
- Retry policies
- OpenTelemetry export
- Role-based access control
Only in Volt
- Pay by bank
- Circuit Breaker
- Virtual IBANs
- Payouts and refunds
- Verify
- Stablecoin checkout
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Convoy
- A fintech that cannot route customer webhook traffic through a third-party SaaS for compliance reasonsnot Volt
- A high-volume platform for which per-message webhook pricing costs more than the flat premium licencenot Volt
- A team that also receives webhooks from many providers and wants ingestion, verification and deduplication in the same gatewaynot Volt
- An engineering group that wants webhook delivery driven directly from an existing Kafka or SQS topicnot Volt
Volt
- A travel seller with high average order values paying percentage card fees it wants to replace with flat transfer feesnot Convoy
- An iGaming operator needing fast deposits and payouts where card acceptance is restrictednot Convoy
- A merchant with heavy card fraud that wants strongly authenticated irreversible paymentsnot Convoy
- A marketplace verifying seller bank accounts before paying outnot Convoy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Convoy
- The default deployment is self-hosted, so you operate Convoy plus Postgres and Redis and carry the on-call burden for the system that delivers your customers' events.
- Frain Technologies is a small startup, and putting customer-facing delivery infrastructure on it means accepting real vendor continuity risk on a component that is hard to swap out quickly.
- The premium tier at a flat 999 US dollars a month is poor value below substantial volume, while the community edition omits the portal, transformations and RBAC that most production deployments end up wanting.
- The hosted cloud trial is capped at one project and 100 events a day, which is too small to properly evaluate the service before committing.
- Documentation and the third-party ecosystem are thinner than the established webhook services, so unusual configurations often mean reading the Go source.
Volt
- Account-to-account payments carry no chargeback mechanism, so consumers lose scheme dispute protection and merchants lose a familiar framework for handling claims.
- Refunds are outbound payments rather than reversals, which changes treasury handling and means a refund can fail for reasons a card refund never would.
- Conversion is lower than a stored card because the shopper must complete a bank authentication journey, and drop-off varies significantly by bank.
- Core pay by bank pricing is per transaction but refunds, payouts, virtual IBANs, Verify and fraud tooling are billed separately, so the real cost is a stack of line items.
- Bank API availability and quality vary across markets, and an outage at a major bank removes a slice of your checkout with no fallback unless you keep cards live.
Pricing, plan by plan
Convoy
Free- CommunityFree
- Self-hosted open source gateway
- Inbound and outbound webhooks
- Automatic retries and message broker support
- Premium$999/month
- Flat rate irrespective of message volume
- Portal links and payload transformation
- RBAC, circuit breaking and white labelling
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- SAML SSO
- Dedicated support with SLA
- On-premises deployment assistance
- Cloud$undefined/month
- Hosted by Convoy
- 14 day trial limited to one project and 100 events a day
- Usage-based tiers above the trial
Volt
On request- Volt pay by bank$undefined/year
- Per successful transaction fee, quoted by volume and market
- Separate charges for refunds, payouts, virtual IBANs and Verify
- Circuit Breaker fraud tooling priced as an add-on
Which should you pick?
Choose Convoy if
- You need inbound and outbound.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- You also want broker-driven ingestion.
Choose Volt if
- You need pay by bank.
- You work on Web, REST API.
- You also want circuit breaker.
Questions people ask
- Is Convoy or Volt better?
- Neither clearly leads. Convoy starts at Free and Volt at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Convoy or Volt?
- Convoy has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Convoy and On request for Volt.
- Does Convoy or Volt run on more platforms?
- Convoy runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud. Volt runs on Web, REST API.
- Can I use Convoy for free?
- Yes. Convoy has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Volt starts at On request.
- What is Convoy best used for?
- Convoy is most often used for a fintech that cannot route customer webhook traffic through a third-party saas for compliance reasons, a high-volume platform for which per-message webhook pricing costs more than the flat premium licence, a team that also receives webhooks from many providers and wants ingestion, verification and deduplication in the same gateway, an engineering group that wants webhook delivery driven directly from an existing kafka or sqs topic. Of those, a fintech that cannot route customer webhook traffic through a third-party saas for compliance reasons and a high-volume platform for which per-message webhook pricing costs more than the flat premium licence are not what Volt is typically brought in for.
- What can Convoy do that Volt cannot?
- Convoy covers Inbound and outbound, Broker-driven ingestion, Payload transformation, Portal links. Volt covers Pay by bank, Circuit Breaker, Virtual IBANs, Payouts and refunds.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Convoy: Is Convoy really open source?
Yes, the community edition is open source and self-hostable, covering both inbound and outbound webhooks with retries.
Volt: Are there chargebacks?
No. Bank transfers are irrevocable, so disputes are handled commercially between merchant and customer, not through a card scheme.
Convoy: What does premium cost?
A flat 999 US dollars a month, self-hosted, regardless of message volume.
Volt: How do refunds work?
As a separate outbound payment initiated by the merchant, which Volt charges for separately from the inbound transaction.
Convoy: Does it receive webhooks as well as send them?
Yes, inbound ingestion with verification and deduplication is a first-class feature, unlike most webhook services.
Volt: Which markets are covered?
Europe and the UK, plus Brazil and Australia, on a single API integration.
Convoy: Do I have to self-host?
No, there is a hosted cloud, but the trial is capped at 100 events a day and self-hosting is the primary model.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Convoy vs Kong
- Convoy vs Svix
- Convoy vs Tyk
- Convoy vs Janus Gateway
- Convoy vs Appwrite
- Convoy vs Gravitee
- Convoy vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Convoy vs Formance
- Convoy vs AWS API Gateway
- Convoy vs Hasura
- Convoy vs PocketBase
- Convoy vs Sensedia
- Convoy vs Sila
- Convoy vs Swagger
- Convoy vs TIBCO Mashery
- Convoy vs Zeplo
- Convoy vs Kong Gateway
- Convoy vs TrueLayer
- Convoy vs Zimpler
- Convoy vs Trustly
- Convoy vs Token.io
- Convoy vs Yapily
- Convoy vs Brite Payments
- Convoy vs Tink
- Convoy vs Dwolla
- Convoy vs Increase
- Convoy vs Fintecture
- Convoy vs Salt Edge
- Convoy vs Tribe Payments
- Convoy vs Unit
- Convoy vs Vodeno
- Convoy vs Weavr
- Convoy vs Apollo GraphQL
- Convoy vs Backendless
- Volt vs Kong
- Volt vs Svix
- Volt vs Tyk
- Volt vs Janus Gateway
- Volt vs Appwrite
- Volt vs Gravitee
- Volt vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Volt vs Formance
- Volt vs AWS API Gateway
- Volt vs Hasura
- Volt vs PocketBase
- Volt vs Sensedia
- Volt vs Sila
- Volt vs Swagger
- Volt vs TIBCO Mashery
- Volt vs Zeplo
- Volt vs Kong Gateway
- Volt vs TrueLayer
- Volt vs Zimpler
- Volt vs Trustly
- Volt vs Token.io
- Volt vs Yapily
- Volt vs Brite Payments
- Volt vs Tink
- Volt vs Dwolla
- Volt vs Increase
- Volt vs Fintecture
- Volt vs Salt Edge
- Volt vs Tribe Payments
- Volt vs Unit
- Volt vs Vodeno
- Volt vs Weavr
- Volt vs Apollo GraphQL
- Volt vs Backendless
