APIs · head to head
Convoy vs RudderStack

Convoy
APIs
Open source webhooks gateway you self-host, handling both sending and receiving
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

RudderStack
Automation Integration
The open-source customer data platform
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Convoy the default deployment is self-hosted, so you operate Convoy plus Postgres and Redis and carry the on-call burden for the system that delivers your customers' events.; RudderStack on the free plan data processing stops after a second consecutive overage rather than being billed, so exceeding 250,000 events twice breaks the pipeline
- They diverge on capability: Convoy covers Inbound and outbound, RudderStack covers Data collection.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Convoy and RudderStack actually diverge.
| Attribute | Convoy | RudderStack |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per month, flat rate regardless of volume | freemium |
| Platforms | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud | Web, Self-hosted |
| Category | APIs | Automation Integration |
| Founded | Unknown | 2018 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Convoy
- Inbound and outbound
- Broker-driven ingestion
- Payload transformation
- Portal links
- Circuit breaking
- Retry policies
- OpenTelemetry export
- Role-based access control
Only in RudderStack
- Data collection
- Event tracking
- Audience segmentation
- Warehouse ingestion
- Real-time sync
- Data transformation
- Privacy controls
- 200+ destinations
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Convoy
- A fintech that cannot route customer webhook traffic through a third-party SaaS for compliance reasonsnot RudderStack
- A high-volume platform for which per-message webhook pricing costs more than the flat premium licencenot RudderStack
- A team that also receives webhooks from many providers and wants ingestion, verification and deduplication in the same gatewaynot RudderStack
- An engineering group that wants webhook delivery driven directly from an existing Kafka or SQS topicnot RudderStack
RudderStack
- Collecting event data from apps and websites and routing it to warehouses and toolsnot Convoy
- Building a warehouse first customer data pipelinenot Convoy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Convoy
- The default deployment is self-hosted, so you operate Convoy plus Postgres and Redis and carry the on-call burden for the system that delivers your customers' events.
- Frain Technologies is a small startup, and putting customer-facing delivery infrastructure on it means accepting real vendor continuity risk on a component that is hard to swap out quickly.
- The premium tier at a flat 999 US dollars a month is poor value below substantial volume, while the community edition omits the portal, transformations and RBAC that most production deployments end up wanting.
- The hosted cloud trial is capped at one project and 100 events a day, which is too small to properly evaluate the service before committing.
- Documentation and the third-party ecosystem are thinner than the established webhook services, so unusual configurations often mean reading the Go source.
RudderStack
- On the free plan data processing stops after a second consecutive overage rather than being billed, so exceeding 250,000 events twice breaks the pipeline
- The free plan allows 250,000 events a month
- Growth starts at $265 a month for 1 million events, with volume sold in tiers up to 25 million
- Overage is charged as the gap to the next tier's price rather than per event, so a small excess costs a full tier step
Pricing, plan by plan
Convoy
Free- CommunityFree
- Self-hosted open source gateway
- Inbound and outbound webhooks
- Automatic retries and message broker support
- Premium$999/month
- Flat rate irrespective of message volume
- Portal links and payload transformation
- RBAC, circuit breaking and white labelling
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- SAML SSO
- Dedicated support with SLA
- On-premises deployment assistance
- Cloud$undefined/month
- Hosted by Convoy
- 14 day trial limited to one project and 100 events a day
- Usage-based tiers above the trial
RudderStack
Free- FreeFree
- 250K events per month
- 16 SDK sources
- 200+ cloud destinations
- Growth$265/month
- 1 million events per month (up to 25 million available)
- Unlimited team members
- Tracking plans
- Enterprise$null/mo
- 5-minute warehouse sync
- Unlimited transformations
- Access to Profiles & Data Apps
Which should you pick?
Choose Convoy if
- You need inbound and outbound.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- You also want broker-driven ingestion.
Choose RudderStack if
- You need data collection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Self-hosted.
- You also want event tracking.
Questions people ask
- Is Convoy or RudderStack better?
- Neither clearly leads. Convoy starts at Free and RudderStack at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Convoy or RudderStack?
- Convoy starts at Free and RudderStack at Free.
- Does Convoy or RudderStack run on more platforms?
- Convoy runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud. RudderStack runs on Web, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Convoy for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Convoy best used for?
- Convoy is most often used for a fintech that cannot route customer webhook traffic through a third-party saas for compliance reasons, a high-volume platform for which per-message webhook pricing costs more than the flat premium licence, a team that also receives webhooks from many providers and wants ingestion, verification and deduplication in the same gateway, an engineering group that wants webhook delivery driven directly from an existing kafka or sqs topic. Of those, a fintech that cannot route customer webhook traffic through a third-party saas for compliance reasons and a high-volume platform for which per-message webhook pricing costs more than the flat premium licence are not what RudderStack is typically brought in for.
- What can Convoy do that RudderStack cannot?
- Convoy covers Inbound and outbound, Broker-driven ingestion, Payload transformation, Portal links. RudderStack covers Data collection, Event tracking, Audience segmentation, Warehouse ingestion.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Convoy: Is Convoy really open source?
Yes, the community edition is open source and self-hostable, covering both inbound and outbound webhooks with retries.
RudderStack: What is RudderStack's free plan limit?
RudderStack's free plan includes 250K events per month with 16 SDK sources, 200+ cloud destinations, warehouse destinations, and Reverse ETL at no cost.
SourceConvoy: What does premium cost?
A flat 999 US dollars a month, self-hosted, regardless of message volume.
RudderStack: How much does RudderStack Growth plan cost?
RudderStack Growth plan costs $265 per month with annual billing discount available, providing 1 million events per month (up to 25 million available), unlimited team members, and 2 workspaces.
SourceConvoy: Does it receive webhooks as well as send them?
Yes, inbound ingestion with verification and deduplication is a first-class feature, unlike most webhook services.
RudderStack: What happens if I exceed my RudderStack event limit?
On the free plan, data processing stops after your second consecutive overage. Paid plan customers face overage fees calculated as the difference between the next tier's pricing and their current plan.
SourceConvoy: Do I have to self-host?
No, there is a hosted cloud, but the trial is capped at 100 events a day and self-hosting is the primary model.
Related pages
More on RudderStack
Other head to heads
- Convoy vs Kong
- Convoy vs Svix
- Convoy vs Tyk
- Convoy vs Janus Gateway
- Convoy vs Appwrite
- Convoy vs Gravitee
- Convoy vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Convoy vs Formance
- Convoy vs AWS API Gateway
- Convoy vs Hasura
- Convoy vs PocketBase
- Convoy vs Sensedia
- Convoy vs Sila
- Convoy vs Swagger
- Convoy vs TIBCO Mashery
- Convoy vs Zeplo
- Convoy vs Kong Gateway
- Convoy vs n8n
- Convoy vs Zapier
- Convoy vs MuleSoft
- Convoy vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Convoy vs Airbyte
- Convoy vs Grouparoo
- Convoy vs Tealium
- Convoy vs mParticle
- Convoy vs Lytics
- Convoy vs Nango
- Convoy vs Windmill
- Convoy vs Flowable
- Convoy vs Hightouch
- Convoy vs Jitterbit
- Convoy vs Pipedream
- Convoy vs Tray.io
- RudderStack vs Kong
- RudderStack vs Svix
- RudderStack vs Tyk
- RudderStack vs Janus Gateway
- RudderStack vs Appwrite
- RudderStack vs Gravitee
- RudderStack vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- RudderStack vs Formance
- RudderStack vs AWS API Gateway
- RudderStack vs Hasura
- RudderStack vs PocketBase
- RudderStack vs Sensedia
- RudderStack vs Sila
- RudderStack vs Swagger
- RudderStack vs TIBCO Mashery
- RudderStack vs Zeplo
- RudderStack vs Kong Gateway
- RudderStack vs n8n
- RudderStack vs Zapier
- RudderStack vs MuleSoft
- RudderStack vs Microsoft Power Automate
- RudderStack vs Airbyte
- RudderStack vs Grouparoo
- RudderStack vs Tealium
- RudderStack vs mParticle
- RudderStack vs Lytics
- RudderStack vs Nango
- RudderStack vs Windmill
- RudderStack vs Flowable
- RudderStack vs Hightouch
- RudderStack vs Jitterbit
- RudderStack vs Pipedream
- RudderStack vs Tray.io
