Softwr

Accounting · head to head

Conta vs Zuora

Conta logo

Conta

Accounting

Norwegian accounting software for small and growing businesses

From
Free
Rated
-
Zuora logo

Zuora

Accounting

Subscription billing and revenue recognition for companies whose pricing is too complex for a payments platform

From
$29/month
Rated
-

The short version

  • Only Conta has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: Conta norwegian pricing only: displayed in NOK without multi-currency support for international comparisons; Zuora pricing includes a component tied to the volume you bill, so the fee rises with your own commercial success in a way a flat platform charge does not, and the renewal conversation after a strong year is a different negotiation from the original one.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 2 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Conta and Zuora actually diverge.

Attributes where Conta and Zuora differ
AttributeContaZuora
Starting priceFree$29/month
Free tierYesNo
PlatformsWebWeb, Api
FoundedUnknown2007

Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Accounting).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Conta

Nothing recorded that Zuora does not also cover.

Only in Zuora

  • Product catalogue
  • Amendment engine
  • Usage rating
  • Recurring invoicing
  • Payments and collections
  • Revenue recognition
  • Quoting and CPQ
  • Multi entity and multi currency

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Conta

  • Norwegian small business accounting and invoicingnot Zuora
  • Project and department cost trackingnot Zuora
  • EHF/eInvoice generation for Norwegian regulatory compliancenot Zuora

Zuora

  • A software company whose contracts routinely change mid term and whose current billing tool cannot prorate an amendment correctlynot Conta
  • A business moving from perpetual licences to subscriptions that needs both the billing and the revenue recognition to hold up under auditnot Conta
  • A usage based product where metered consumption has to be rated against tiers and commitments before it can be invoicednot Conta
  • A group billing across several legal entities and currencies that has been reconciling invoices in spreadsheetsnot Conta

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Conta

  • Norwegian pricing only: displayed in NOK without multi-currency support for international comparisons
  • Annual billing required: no monthly-pay option for either tier, forcing yearly commitment
  • Pro tier vaporware: listed as 'coming soon' with no pricing or feature roadmap provided
  • Limited feature differentiation: Smart tier is 'most selected' by customers but does not clearly explain what additional business value justifies 62% price premium over Standard

Zuora

  • Pricing includes a component tied to the volume you bill, so the fee rises with your own commercial success in a way a flat platform charge does not, and the renewal conversation after a strong year is a different negotiation from the original one.
  • Implementation is a multi quarter project that normally requires a systems integrator, so the first year cost is dominated by services rather than subscription, and the internal cost of finance and engineering time on catalogue and process design is larger still.
  • Product catalogue decisions made during implementation constrain what you can price and report for years, and changing them later means reworking live subscriptions and the revenue history attached to them rather than editing a configuration.
  • It is a subsidiary system rather than the general ledger, so someone has to own the reconciliation between billing, revenue and the accounts every period, and a mapping error surfaces as an unexplained variance in the close rather than as an obvious failure.
  • Billing and revenue are separate products with separate implementations, so a company that buys billing first and adds revenue later runs a second project against data models that were not designed together in the first place.

Pricing, plan by plan

Conta

Free
  • Conta Regnskap Standard$209/month (billed annually)
  • Conta Regnskap Smart$339/month (billed annually)
  • Conta Regnskap Pro$undefined/mo

Zuora

$29/month
  • LaunchFree
    • Up to $100K revenue
    • Core billing
    • Basic reporting
  • ScaleFree
    • Custom pricing
    • Advanced billing
    • Revenue automation

Which should you pick?

Choose Conta if

  • You want to start without paying.

Choose Zuora if

  • You need product catalogue.
  • You work on Web, Api.
  • You also want amendment engine.

Questions people ask

Is Conta or Zuora better?
Neither clearly leads. Conta starts at Free and Zuora at $29/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Conta or Zuora?
Conta has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Conta and $29/month for Zuora.
Does Conta or Zuora run on more platforms?
Conta runs on Web. Zuora runs on Web, Api.
Can I use Conta for free?
Yes. Conta has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Zuora starts at $29/month.
What is Conta best used for?
Conta is most often used for norwegian small business accounting and invoicing, project and department cost tracking, ehf/einvoice generation for norwegian regulatory compliance. Of those, norwegian small business accounting and invoicing and project and department cost tracking are not what Zuora is typically brought in for.
What can Conta do that Zuora cannot?
Zuora covers Product catalogue, Amendment engine, Usage rating, Recurring invoicing.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Conta: How much does Conta cost per month?

Conta Regnskap Standard costs 209 NOK/month and Smart costs 339 NOK/month, billed annually. Both exclude VAT and include a 30-day free trial option.

Source
Zuora: When is a company ready for Zuora rather than a simpler billing tool?

When the pricing model breaks the simpler tool: mid term amendments, ramps, usage tiers, multi entity billing or a revenue recognition requirement. Companies with flat monthly plans and few changes do not need it and will not enjoy paying for it.

Conta: Can I pay monthly instead of annually?

No. Both Standard and Smart tiers require annual billing at a fixed monthly rate. Monthly-payment options are not available.

Source
Zuora: Does Zuora replace our accounting system?

No. It is a billing and revenue subledger that posts journals to your general ledger. You still need the ledger and someone owning the reconciliation between them.

Conta: What is included in the Standard vs. Smart plan?

Standard includes accounting, invoicing, unlimited receipts, mobile app, and EHF/eInvoice. Smart adds KID numbers, unlimited EHF, project/department management, free chat/phone support, and exclusive equipment discounts.

Source
Zuora: How long does an implementation take?

Plan in quarters. Catalogue design, order to cash process definition, data migration of existing subscriptions and ledger mapping each take real time, and the migration of live contracts is usually the hardest part.

Conta: When will the Pro plan be available and what will it cost?

The Pro tier is listed as 'coming soon' on the pricing page with no published pricing or launch date provided.

Source
Zuora: Does it calculate sales tax and VAT?

It integrates with third party tax engines rather than maintaining rates itself. Budget for that engine as a separate subscription and a separate integration.

Zuora: What changed when the company was taken private in 2025?

Ownership, not the product. As with any private equity owned platform, pay attention to renewal pricing behaviour and to roadmap commitments made verbally rather than contractually.

Zuora: Can we migrate our existing subscriptions in?

Yes, and it is the part of the project people underestimate. Every live contract has to arrive with its amendment history intact if the revenue schedules are to be right, so the migration is an accounting exercise as much as a data one.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads