Proposals · head to head
Cone vs Daylite

Cone
Proposals
Proposal to payment software for accounting and bookkeeping firms, with engagement letters and direct debit
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Daylite
CRM
CRM and project management built exclusively for Mac, iPhone and iPad
- From
- $15/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cone the product is shaped around accountancy engagements, so a freelancer or agency outside professional services pays for engagement letter and compliance features they will never open.; Daylite it is Apple-only. There is no Windows client, so a single team member on a Windows machine, or a client-facing contractor who is not on a Mac, makes the product unworkable for the whole organisation.
- They diverge on capability: Cone covers Engagement letters, Daylite covers Native Apple apps.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cone and Daylite actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cone
- Engagement letters
- Electronic signature
- Recurring billing
- Direct debit collection
- Scope creep flagging
- Service line templates
- Client onboarding tasks
Only in Daylite
- Native Apple apps
- Apple Mail Assistant
- Projects as first-class objects
- Pipelines
- Linked records
- Smart lists
- Offline working
- Delegation
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cone
- A bookkeeping practice moving clients from ad hoc invoicing onto signed recurring fee agreementsnot Daylite
- An accountancy firm that needs engagement letter wording attached to every proposal for compliance reasonsnot Daylite
- A practice losing revenue to out of scope work that is never billed because nobody notices itnot Daylite
- Standardising pricing across a firm so that partners stop quoting the same service at different ratesnot Daylite
Daylite
- An all-Mac law firm or architecture practice wants a CRM that behaves like Mac software and files emails from Apple Mail rather than forcing everyone into a browser tab.not Cone
- A consultancy needs client relationships and delivery projects in one system, where the project is a real record with its own tasks and meetings rather than a custom object bolted onto a deal.not Cone
- A team works frequently without connectivity, on site or in transit, and needs a CRM with a genuine local data store rather than a web app that degrades to nothing offline.not Cone
- A small business already standardised on Apple hardware wants to avoid paying for a CRM whose Mac experience is an afterthought.not Cone
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cone
- The product is shaped around accountancy engagements, so a freelancer or agency outside professional services pays for engagement letter and compliance features they will never open.
- Recurring collection depends on which payment rails are supported in your country, and direct debit coverage varies enough that the headline benefit may not apply to your client base.
- Practice management integration is shallower than the incumbents, so client records often exist in two systems and have to be reconciled.
- Pricing is not published, which makes it hard to compare against a general proposal tool without entering a sales process first.
- As a younger vendor in a market that consolidates through acquisition, roadmap continuity carries more risk than choosing an established practice software supplier.
Daylite
- It is Apple-only. There is no Windows client, so a single team member on a Windows machine, or a client-facing contractor who is not on a Mac, makes the product unworkable for the whole organisation.
- The web experience is secondary to the native apps, so remote access from a borrowed or non-Apple computer is limited in a way buyers used to browser CRMs do not anticipate.
- It has no built-in marketing automation, email campaigns or lead scoring, so anything beyond one-to-one email means a separate tool and a Zapier connection.
- Plan caps are hard rather than advisory: Leap is a single user with 500 contacts, and crossing twenty users forces you from Growth to Scale, which is a 50 per cent increase in the per-user rate for capacity you may not need.
- Third-party integrations are thin compared with HubSpot or Pipedrive, and much of what does exist runs through Zapier, so accounting, telephony and support connections are indirect and add their own subscription cost.
Pricing, plan by plan
Cone
On request- Cone$undefined/year
- Proposals and engagement letters
- Electronic signature
- Recurring billing and direct debit mandates
Daylite
$15/month- Leap$15/month
- One user only
- 500 contacts
- One email integration
- Growth$30/month
- Up to 20 users
- 25,000 contacts
- Three email integrations per user
- Scale$45/month
- Up to 100 users
- 250,000 contacts
- Ten email integrations per user
- Custom$undefined/month
- For teams of ten or more with specific requirements
- Quoted on application
Which should you pick?
Choose Daylite if
- You need native apple apps.
- You work on macOS, iOS, iPadOS.
- You also want apple mail assistant.
Questions people ask
- Is Cone or Daylite better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cone starts at On request and Daylite at $15/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cone or Daylite?
- Cone starts at On request and Daylite at $15/month.
- Does Cone or Daylite run on more platforms?
- Cone runs on Web. Daylite runs on macOS, iOS, iPadOS.
- What is Cone best used for?
- Cone is most often used for a bookkeeping practice moving clients from ad hoc invoicing onto signed recurring fee agreements, an accountancy firm that needs engagement letter wording attached to every proposal for compliance reasons, a practice losing revenue to out of scope work that is never billed because nobody notices it, standardising pricing across a firm so that partners stop quoting the same service at different rates. Of those, a bookkeeping practice moving clients from ad hoc invoicing onto signed recurring fee agreements and an accountancy firm that needs engagement letter wording attached to every proposal for compliance reasons are not what Daylite is typically brought in for.
- What can Cone do that Daylite cannot?
- Cone covers Engagement letters, Electronic signature, Recurring billing, Direct debit collection. Daylite covers Native Apple apps, Apple Mail Assistant, Projects as first-class objects, Pipelines.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cone: Is this only for accountants?
It is designed for accounting and bookkeeping firms. Other professional services firms use it, but general freelancers will find most of it irrelevant.
Daylite: Does Daylite run on Windows?
No. It is macOS, iPadOS and iOS only. This is the single most common reason buyers rule it out.
Cone: Does it handle recurring fees?
Yes, and that is the main reason firms adopt it. Acceptance creates the fee schedule and the collection mandate together.
Daylite: Is there a web version?
There is browser access, but the product is designed around the native Mac app and the web view is not a full replacement.
Cone: How are payments collected?
Through supported card and direct debit providers, whose processing fees apply on top of the subscription.
Daylite: What does it cost?
Leap is 15 US dollars a month for one user billed annually, Growth 30 per user and Scale 45 per user, rising to 20, 40 and 60 on monthly billing.
Cone: What is scope creep flagging?
It compares work performed against the scope agreed in the proposal and surfaces the difference so it can be billed rather than absorbed.
Daylite: Does it work offline?
Yes. The Mac app keeps a local store and syncs through Marketcircle Cloud when a connection returns.
Cone: Is pricing published?
Not in a form that can be quoted reliably. Expect a sales conversation before you can compare it on cost.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Cone vs Bidsketch
- Cone vs Paperbell
- Cone vs Prospect
- Cone vs GetAccept
- Cone vs HelloSign
- Cone vs Microsoft Dynamics 365
- Cone vs Responsive
- Cone vs Dubsado
- Cone vs HoneyBook
- Cone vs Nutshell
- Cone vs 17hats
- Cone vs Indy
- Cone vs RFPIO
- Cone vs Subskribe
- Cone vs Nusii
- Cone vs Prospero
- Cone vs Insightly
- Cone vs Copper
- Cone vs Pipedrive
- Cone vs Apptivo
- Cone vs Less Annoying CRM
- Cone vs Bigin
- Cone vs OnePageCRM
- Cone vs Really Simple Systems
- Cone vs Solid Performers
- Cone vs Krayin
- Cone vs Twenty
- Cone vs HubSpot
- Cone vs Lusha
- Cone vs Reply.io
- Cone vs Snov.io
- Cone vs Woodpecker
- Cone vs Agile CRM
- Daylite vs Bidsketch
- Daylite vs Paperbell
- Daylite vs Prospect
- Daylite vs GetAccept
- Daylite vs HelloSign
- Daylite vs Microsoft Dynamics 365
- Daylite vs Responsive
- Daylite vs Dubsado
- Daylite vs HoneyBook
- Daylite vs Nutshell
- Daylite vs 17hats
- Daylite vs Indy
- Daylite vs RFPIO
- Daylite vs Subskribe
- Daylite vs Nusii
- Daylite vs Prospero
- Daylite vs Insightly
- Daylite vs Copper
- Daylite vs Pipedrive
- Daylite vs Apptivo
- Daylite vs Less Annoying CRM
- Daylite vs Bigin
- Daylite vs OnePageCRM
- Daylite vs Really Simple Systems
- Daylite vs Solid Performers
- Daylite vs Krayin
- Daylite vs Twenty
- Daylite vs HubSpot
- Daylite vs Lusha
- Daylite vs Reply.io
- Daylite vs Snov.io
- Daylite vs Woodpecker
- Daylite vs Agile CRM
